从摇篮到坟墓:使用多标准优化和生命周期评估评估面包生产和浪费

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shreefah Aljaber, Esra Aleisa, Ali Allahverdi
{"title":"从摇篮到坟墓:使用多标准优化和生命周期评估评估面包生产和浪费","authors":"Shreefah Aljaber,&nbsp;Esra Aleisa,&nbsp;Ali Allahverdi","doi":"10.1007/s10163-025-02267-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bread is a fundamental staple in the diets of numerous nations. However, bread waste ranks among the most discarded food items globally, making a significant contribution to the ongoing challenge of global food waste. The impact of bread production and bread waste is assessed environmentally through multicriteria optimization, for carbon footprint, water footprint and cost. Two of the most consumed bread types, flat (pita) and yeast bread, are examined and are analyzed through life cycle assessment. The scope includes production stages and end of life alternatives including animal feed use, composting, incineration, and landfilling are examined. The results indicate that flat bread requires 674 m<sup>3</sup> of water and produces around 721.86 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq. per ton, while yeast bread requires 1379.86 m<sup>3</sup> of water and emits 930.68 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq. per ton. The wheat-milling process alone contributes to 75% of the carbon emissions. Animal feed from bread waste is most viable environmentally, saving 823.2 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq. for each type of bread waste valorized. Prioritizing water and carbon footprints suggest the use of bread waste as animal feed. Conversely, composting and incineration with energy recovery emerge as optimal solutions when a greater emphasis is placed on cost allocation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"27 4","pages":"2684 - 2698"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From cradle to grave: evaluating bread production and waste using multicriteria optimization and life cycle assessment\",\"authors\":\"Shreefah Aljaber,&nbsp;Esra Aleisa,&nbsp;Ali Allahverdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-025-02267-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Bread is a fundamental staple in the diets of numerous nations. However, bread waste ranks among the most discarded food items globally, making a significant contribution to the ongoing challenge of global food waste. The impact of bread production and bread waste is assessed environmentally through multicriteria optimization, for carbon footprint, water footprint and cost. Two of the most consumed bread types, flat (pita) and yeast bread, are examined and are analyzed through life cycle assessment. The scope includes production stages and end of life alternatives including animal feed use, composting, incineration, and landfilling are examined. The results indicate that flat bread requires 674 m<sup>3</sup> of water and produces around 721.86 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq. per ton, while yeast bread requires 1379.86 m<sup>3</sup> of water and emits 930.68 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq. per ton. The wheat-milling process alone contributes to 75% of the carbon emissions. Animal feed from bread waste is most viable environmentally, saving 823.2 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq. for each type of bread waste valorized. Prioritizing water and carbon footprints suggest the use of bread waste as animal feed. Conversely, composting and incineration with energy recovery emerge as optimal solutions when a greater emphasis is placed on cost allocation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"2684 - 2698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-025-02267-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-025-02267-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

面包是许多国家饮食中的基本主食。然而,面包垃圾是全球被丢弃最多的食品之一,对全球食物浪费的持续挑战做出了重大贡献。通过对碳足迹、水足迹和成本的多标准优化,对面包生产和面包浪费的影响进行环境评估。通过生命周期评估,对两种消费最多的面包类型,扁平面包(皮塔饼)和酵母面包进行了检查和分析。范围包括生产阶段和生命结束的替代品,包括动物饲料的使用,堆肥,焚烧和垃圾填埋进行了检查。结果表明,扁平面包每吨需要674立方米的水,产生约721.86千克二氧化碳当量,而酵母面包每吨需要1379.86立方米的水,排放930.68千克二氧化碳当量。仅小麦碾磨过程就产生了75%的碳排放。从面包废料中提取动物饲料是最环保的,每一种面包废料可节省823.2千克二氧化碳当量。优先考虑水和碳足迹意味着将面包废料用作动物饲料。相反,当更强调成本分配时,具有能量回收的堆肥和焚烧成为最佳解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From cradle to grave: evaluating bread production and waste using multicriteria optimization and life cycle assessment

Bread is a fundamental staple in the diets of numerous nations. However, bread waste ranks among the most discarded food items globally, making a significant contribution to the ongoing challenge of global food waste. The impact of bread production and bread waste is assessed environmentally through multicriteria optimization, for carbon footprint, water footprint and cost. Two of the most consumed bread types, flat (pita) and yeast bread, are examined and are analyzed through life cycle assessment. The scope includes production stages and end of life alternatives including animal feed use, composting, incineration, and landfilling are examined. The results indicate that flat bread requires 674 m3 of water and produces around 721.86 kg CO2 eq. per ton, while yeast bread requires 1379.86 m3 of water and emits 930.68 kg CO2 eq. per ton. The wheat-milling process alone contributes to 75% of the carbon emissions. Animal feed from bread waste is most viable environmentally, saving 823.2 kg CO2 eq. for each type of bread waste valorized. Prioritizing water and carbon footprints suggest the use of bread waste as animal feed. Conversely, composting and incineration with energy recovery emerge as optimal solutions when a greater emphasis is placed on cost allocation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信