基于元启发式算法的高性能混凝土抗压强度评估优化驱动的XGBoost模型

Q2 Engineering
Amit Kumar Rai, Shiv Shankar Kumar
{"title":"基于元启发式算法的高性能混凝土抗压强度评估优化驱动的XGBoost模型","authors":"Amit Kumar Rai,&nbsp;Shiv Shankar Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01379-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Compressive strength (CS) is a key property of concrete mix, but the determination of CS requires costly and time intensive experimental procedures. Leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques for CS prediction can enhance accuracy and reliability while reducing the extensive need for laboratory testing.This study utilizes high performance concrete mix data set and employs the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) ML model coupled with six metaheuristic optimization techniques such as genetic algorithm (GA), Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), Beetle Antennae Search (BAS), Bayesian Optimization (BO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Optina to fine tune its hyperparameters. The objective of the present work is to enhance the performance of ML model while ensuring robust generalization and computational efficiency. The performance of the tuned XGBoost models was assessed using evaluation metrics such as the coefficient of determination (<span>\\(\\hbox {R}^{2}\\)</span>), root mean square error (RMSE), and the time taken for optimization (in seconds). Among these hybrid models XGBoost-Optuna emerged as the best performing model while achieving the highest accuracy with testing <span>\\(\\hbox {R}^{2}\\)</span> (0.9345), minimal overfitting and the fastest optimization time (61.32 s). However, XGBoost-GWO demonstrated comparable accuracy for testing <span>\\(\\hbox {R}^{2}\\)</span> of 0.9344 and generalization capability but required significantly higher optimization time (2821.25 s). XGBoost-Bayesian performed best against overfitting of the model but had a lower <span>\\(\\hbox {R}^{2}\\)</span> value of 0.9260 compared to other models. XGBoost-BAS offered a balanced trade off between accuracy and optimization time but did not outperform machine learning model optimized by Optuna.Overall, XGBoost-Optuna proved to be the most optimal choice by offering an excellent balance of accuracy, generalization, and computational efficiency which makes it a robust solution for predictive modeling in concrete mix design. </p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 8","pages":"3401 - 3421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization-driven XGBoost model with metaheuristic algorithms for assessing compressive strength of high-performance concrete\",\"authors\":\"Amit Kumar Rai,&nbsp;Shiv Shankar Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42107-025-01379-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Compressive strength (CS) is a key property of concrete mix, but the determination of CS requires costly and time intensive experimental procedures. Leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques for CS prediction can enhance accuracy and reliability while reducing the extensive need for laboratory testing.This study utilizes high performance concrete mix data set and employs the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) ML model coupled with six metaheuristic optimization techniques such as genetic algorithm (GA), Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), Beetle Antennae Search (BAS), Bayesian Optimization (BO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Optina to fine tune its hyperparameters. The objective of the present work is to enhance the performance of ML model while ensuring robust generalization and computational efficiency. The performance of the tuned XGBoost models was assessed using evaluation metrics such as the coefficient of determination (<span>\\\\(\\\\hbox {R}^{2}\\\\)</span>), root mean square error (RMSE), and the time taken for optimization (in seconds). Among these hybrid models XGBoost-Optuna emerged as the best performing model while achieving the highest accuracy with testing <span>\\\\(\\\\hbox {R}^{2}\\\\)</span> (0.9345), minimal overfitting and the fastest optimization time (61.32 s). However, XGBoost-GWO demonstrated comparable accuracy for testing <span>\\\\(\\\\hbox {R}^{2}\\\\)</span> of 0.9344 and generalization capability but required significantly higher optimization time (2821.25 s). XGBoost-Bayesian performed best against overfitting of the model but had a lower <span>\\\\(\\\\hbox {R}^{2}\\\\)</span> value of 0.9260 compared to other models. XGBoost-BAS offered a balanced trade off between accuracy and optimization time but did not outperform machine learning model optimized by Optuna.Overall, XGBoost-Optuna proved to be the most optimal choice by offering an excellent balance of accuracy, generalization, and computational efficiency which makes it a robust solution for predictive modeling in concrete mix design. </p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"26 8\",\"pages\":\"3401 - 3421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01379-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01379-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抗压强度(CS)是混凝土混合料的一项关键性能,但CS的测定需要昂贵且耗时的实验程序。利用机器学习(ML)技术进行CS预测可以提高准确性和可靠性,同时减少对实验室测试的广泛需求。本研究利用高性能混凝土混合料数据集,采用极限梯度增强(XGBoost) ML模型,结合遗传算法(GA)、灰狼优化(GWO)、甲虫天线搜索(BAS)、贝叶斯优化(BO)、粒子群优化(PSO)和Optina等六种元启发优化技术对其超参数进行微调。本工作的目的是在保证鲁棒泛化和计算效率的同时提高机器学习模型的性能。调整后的XGBoost模型的性能使用评估指标进行评估,例如决定系数(\(\hbox {R}^{2}\))、均方根误差(RMSE)和优化所需的时间(以秒为单位)。在混合模型中,XGBoost-Optuna以\(\hbox {R}^{2}\)(0.9345)、最小的过拟合和最快的优化时间(61.32 s)获得了最高的准确率,是表现最好的模型。然而,XGBoost-GWO测试\(\hbox {R}^{2}\)的准确率为0.9344,泛化能力也相当,但需要的优化时间明显更高(2821.25 s)。XGBoost-Bayesian对模型的过拟合表现最好,但与其他模型相比,\(\hbox {R}^{2}\)值较低,为0.9260。XGBoost-BAS提供了精度和优化时间之间的平衡,但没有优于Optuna优化的机器学习模型。总的来说,XGBoost-Optuna被证明是最理想的选择,它提供了精度、泛化和计算效率的良好平衡,使其成为混凝土配合比设计预测建模的强大解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimization-driven XGBoost model with metaheuristic algorithms for assessing compressive strength of high-performance concrete

Optimization-driven XGBoost model with metaheuristic algorithms for assessing compressive strength of high-performance concrete

Compressive strength (CS) is a key property of concrete mix, but the determination of CS requires costly and time intensive experimental procedures. Leveraging machine learning (ML) techniques for CS prediction can enhance accuracy and reliability while reducing the extensive need for laboratory testing.This study utilizes high performance concrete mix data set and employs the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) ML model coupled with six metaheuristic optimization techniques such as genetic algorithm (GA), Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), Beetle Antennae Search (BAS), Bayesian Optimization (BO), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Optina to fine tune its hyperparameters. The objective of the present work is to enhance the performance of ML model while ensuring robust generalization and computational efficiency. The performance of the tuned XGBoost models was assessed using evaluation metrics such as the coefficient of determination (\(\hbox {R}^{2}\)), root mean square error (RMSE), and the time taken for optimization (in seconds). Among these hybrid models XGBoost-Optuna emerged as the best performing model while achieving the highest accuracy with testing \(\hbox {R}^{2}\) (0.9345), minimal overfitting and the fastest optimization time (61.32 s). However, XGBoost-GWO demonstrated comparable accuracy for testing \(\hbox {R}^{2}\) of 0.9344 and generalization capability but required significantly higher optimization time (2821.25 s). XGBoost-Bayesian performed best against overfitting of the model but had a lower \(\hbox {R}^{2}\) value of 0.9260 compared to other models. XGBoost-BAS offered a balanced trade off between accuracy and optimization time but did not outperform machine learning model optimized by Optuna.Overall, XGBoost-Optuna proved to be the most optimal choice by offering an excellent balance of accuracy, generalization, and computational efficiency which makes it a robust solution for predictive modeling in concrete mix design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信