来自西班牙批发食品市场的消化物:作为生物肥料的价值和与合成肥料相比的环境影响分析

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Carmen Martín-Sanz-Garrido, Marta Revuelta-Aramburu, Carlos Morales-Polo, Ana María Santos-Montes
{"title":"来自西班牙批发食品市场的消化物:作为生物肥料的价值和与合成肥料相比的环境影响分析","authors":"Carmen Martín-Sanz-Garrido,&nbsp;Marta Revuelta-Aramburu,&nbsp;Carlos Morales-Polo,&nbsp;Ana María Santos-Montes","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a comprehensive environmental impact assessment of biofertilizers from digestate in Spain’s 23 most extensive food markets using life cycle analysis. Eleven impact categories were evaluated. Results revealed significant variations in impacts across food markets, primarily due to differences in infrastructure sizing and energy self-sufficiency. Markets with appropriately sized anaerobic digestion facilities and energy self-sufficiency demonstrated significant environmental benefits, resulting in emission savings in 9 of the 11 impact categories assessed, except acidification and eutrophication. As a representative case of the markets with properly sized anaerobic digestion infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency, Market G as a representative market achieved up to 86% reduction in abiotic depletion and over 75% in toxicity categories. However, four food markets with either oversized or undersized infrastructure exhibited lower benefits, with Market A showing no advantages over synthetic fertilizers. In addition, the acidification and eutrophication categories posed challenges for all markets due to ammonia emissions during composting; in these impact categories, the values of biofertilizers are 5 to 8 times higher, depending on the market. When comparing unit and aggregate values (single scores), 19 out of 23 markets offer environmentally sustainable biofertilizers, resulting in an average emission savings of 55%. In conclusion, biofertilizers present a more sustainable alternative to synthetic fertilizers in most markets, contingent on adequate infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency. Future studies should focus on optimizing facility sizing and evaluating the influence of waste composition, as both factors significantly affect the environmental performance of digestate-based biofertilizers. This research highlights the potential of biofertilizers to contribute to more sustainable agricultural practices when the production process is well-optimized.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digestate from Spanish wholesale food markets: valorization as biofertilizer and analysis of environmental impacts compared to synthetic fertilizers\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Martín-Sanz-Garrido,&nbsp;Marta Revuelta-Aramburu,&nbsp;Carlos Morales-Polo,&nbsp;Ana María Santos-Montes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study presents a comprehensive environmental impact assessment of biofertilizers from digestate in Spain’s 23 most extensive food markets using life cycle analysis. Eleven impact categories were evaluated. Results revealed significant variations in impacts across food markets, primarily due to differences in infrastructure sizing and energy self-sufficiency. Markets with appropriately sized anaerobic digestion facilities and energy self-sufficiency demonstrated significant environmental benefits, resulting in emission savings in 9 of the 11 impact categories assessed, except acidification and eutrophication. As a representative case of the markets with properly sized anaerobic digestion infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency, Market G as a representative market achieved up to 86% reduction in abiotic depletion and over 75% in toxicity categories. However, four food markets with either oversized or undersized infrastructure exhibited lower benefits, with Market A showing no advantages over synthetic fertilizers. In addition, the acidification and eutrophication categories posed challenges for all markets due to ammonia emissions during composting; in these impact categories, the values of biofertilizers are 5 to 8 times higher, depending on the market. When comparing unit and aggregate values (single scores), 19 out of 23 markets offer environmentally sustainable biofertilizers, resulting in an average emission savings of 55%. In conclusion, biofertilizers present a more sustainable alternative to synthetic fertilizers in most markets, contingent on adequate infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency. Future studies should focus on optimizing facility sizing and evaluating the influence of waste composition, as both factors significantly affect the environmental performance of digestate-based biofertilizers. This research highlights the potential of biofertilizers to contribute to more sustainable agricultural practices when the production process is well-optimized.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了一个全面的环境影响评估,从消化道生物肥料在西班牙的23个最广泛的食品市场使用生命周期分析。评估了11个影响类别。结果显示,粮食市场的影响存在显著差异,主要是由于基础设施规模和能源自给自足的差异。拥有适当规模的厌氧消化设施和能源自给自足的市场显示出显著的环境效益,在评估的11个影响类别中,除酸化和富营养化外,有9个类别的排放减少。作为具有适当规模的厌氧消化基础设施和能源自给自足的市场的代表性案例,市场G作为一个代表性市场,实现了高达86%的非生物耗竭减少和75%以上的毒性类别。然而,四个基础设施规模过大或过小的食品市场表现出较低的效益,市场A没有表现出比合成肥料更大的优势。此外,由于堆肥过程中氨的排放,酸化和富营养化类别对所有市场构成挑战;在这些影响类别中,根据市场的不同,生物肥料的价值要高出5到8倍。在比较单位价值和总体价值(单个得分)时,23个市场中有19个提供环境可持续的生物肥料,平均减少55%的排放。总而言之,在大多数市场上,生物肥料是比合成肥料更可持续的替代品,但前提是基础设施充足和能源自给自足。未来的研究应侧重于优化设施规模和评估废物组成的影响,因为这两个因素对消化粪便生物肥料的环境性能都有显著影响。这项研究强调了当生产过程得到充分优化时,生物肥料在促进更可持续农业实践方面的潜力。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digestate from Spanish wholesale food markets: valorization as biofertilizer and analysis of environmental impacts compared to synthetic fertilizers

This study presents a comprehensive environmental impact assessment of biofertilizers from digestate in Spain’s 23 most extensive food markets using life cycle analysis. Eleven impact categories were evaluated. Results revealed significant variations in impacts across food markets, primarily due to differences in infrastructure sizing and energy self-sufficiency. Markets with appropriately sized anaerobic digestion facilities and energy self-sufficiency demonstrated significant environmental benefits, resulting in emission savings in 9 of the 11 impact categories assessed, except acidification and eutrophication. As a representative case of the markets with properly sized anaerobic digestion infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency, Market G as a representative market achieved up to 86% reduction in abiotic depletion and over 75% in toxicity categories. However, four food markets with either oversized or undersized infrastructure exhibited lower benefits, with Market A showing no advantages over synthetic fertilizers. In addition, the acidification and eutrophication categories posed challenges for all markets due to ammonia emissions during composting; in these impact categories, the values of biofertilizers are 5 to 8 times higher, depending on the market. When comparing unit and aggregate values (single scores), 19 out of 23 markets offer environmentally sustainable biofertilizers, resulting in an average emission savings of 55%. In conclusion, biofertilizers present a more sustainable alternative to synthetic fertilizers in most markets, contingent on adequate infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency. Future studies should focus on optimizing facility sizing and evaluating the influence of waste composition, as both factors significantly affect the environmental performance of digestate-based biofertilizers. This research highlights the potential of biofertilizers to contribute to more sustainable agricultural practices when the production process is well-optimized.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信