Carmen Martín-Sanz-Garrido, Marta Revuelta-Aramburu, Carlos Morales-Polo, Ana María Santos-Montes
{"title":"来自西班牙批发食品市场的消化物:作为生物肥料的价值和与合成肥料相比的环境影响分析","authors":"Carmen Martín-Sanz-Garrido, Marta Revuelta-Aramburu, Carlos Morales-Polo, Ana María Santos-Montes","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents a comprehensive environmental impact assessment of biofertilizers from digestate in Spain’s 23 most extensive food markets using life cycle analysis. Eleven impact categories were evaluated. Results revealed significant variations in impacts across food markets, primarily due to differences in infrastructure sizing and energy self-sufficiency. Markets with appropriately sized anaerobic digestion facilities and energy self-sufficiency demonstrated significant environmental benefits, resulting in emission savings in 9 of the 11 impact categories assessed, except acidification and eutrophication. As a representative case of the markets with properly sized anaerobic digestion infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency, Market G as a representative market achieved up to 86% reduction in abiotic depletion and over 75% in toxicity categories. However, four food markets with either oversized or undersized infrastructure exhibited lower benefits, with Market A showing no advantages over synthetic fertilizers. In addition, the acidification and eutrophication categories posed challenges for all markets due to ammonia emissions during composting; in these impact categories, the values of biofertilizers are 5 to 8 times higher, depending on the market. When comparing unit and aggregate values (single scores), 19 out of 23 markets offer environmentally sustainable biofertilizers, resulting in an average emission savings of 55%. In conclusion, biofertilizers present a more sustainable alternative to synthetic fertilizers in most markets, contingent on adequate infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency. Future studies should focus on optimizing facility sizing and evaluating the influence of waste composition, as both factors significantly affect the environmental performance of digestate-based biofertilizers. This research highlights the potential of biofertilizers to contribute to more sustainable agricultural practices when the production process is well-optimized.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digestate from Spanish wholesale food markets: valorization as biofertilizer and analysis of environmental impacts compared to synthetic fertilizers\",\"authors\":\"Carmen Martín-Sanz-Garrido, Marta Revuelta-Aramburu, Carlos Morales-Polo, Ana María Santos-Montes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study presents a comprehensive environmental impact assessment of biofertilizers from digestate in Spain’s 23 most extensive food markets using life cycle analysis. Eleven impact categories were evaluated. Results revealed significant variations in impacts across food markets, primarily due to differences in infrastructure sizing and energy self-sufficiency. Markets with appropriately sized anaerobic digestion facilities and energy self-sufficiency demonstrated significant environmental benefits, resulting in emission savings in 9 of the 11 impact categories assessed, except acidification and eutrophication. As a representative case of the markets with properly sized anaerobic digestion infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency, Market G as a representative market achieved up to 86% reduction in abiotic depletion and over 75% in toxicity categories. However, four food markets with either oversized or undersized infrastructure exhibited lower benefits, with Market A showing no advantages over synthetic fertilizers. In addition, the acidification and eutrophication categories posed challenges for all markets due to ammonia emissions during composting; in these impact categories, the values of biofertilizers are 5 to 8 times higher, depending on the market. When comparing unit and aggregate values (single scores), 19 out of 23 markets offer environmentally sustainable biofertilizers, resulting in an average emission savings of 55%. In conclusion, biofertilizers present a more sustainable alternative to synthetic fertilizers in most markets, contingent on adequate infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency. Future studies should focus on optimizing facility sizing and evaluating the influence of waste composition, as both factors significantly affect the environmental performance of digestate-based biofertilizers. This research highlights the potential of biofertilizers to contribute to more sustainable agricultural practices when the production process is well-optimized.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Sciences Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01183-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Digestate from Spanish wholesale food markets: valorization as biofertilizer and analysis of environmental impacts compared to synthetic fertilizers
This study presents a comprehensive environmental impact assessment of biofertilizers from digestate in Spain’s 23 most extensive food markets using life cycle analysis. Eleven impact categories were evaluated. Results revealed significant variations in impacts across food markets, primarily due to differences in infrastructure sizing and energy self-sufficiency. Markets with appropriately sized anaerobic digestion facilities and energy self-sufficiency demonstrated significant environmental benefits, resulting in emission savings in 9 of the 11 impact categories assessed, except acidification and eutrophication. As a representative case of the markets with properly sized anaerobic digestion infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency, Market G as a representative market achieved up to 86% reduction in abiotic depletion and over 75% in toxicity categories. However, four food markets with either oversized or undersized infrastructure exhibited lower benefits, with Market A showing no advantages over synthetic fertilizers. In addition, the acidification and eutrophication categories posed challenges for all markets due to ammonia emissions during composting; in these impact categories, the values of biofertilizers are 5 to 8 times higher, depending on the market. When comparing unit and aggregate values (single scores), 19 out of 23 markets offer environmentally sustainable biofertilizers, resulting in an average emission savings of 55%. In conclusion, biofertilizers present a more sustainable alternative to synthetic fertilizers in most markets, contingent on adequate infrastructure and energy self-sufficiency. Future studies should focus on optimizing facility sizing and evaluating the influence of waste composition, as both factors significantly affect the environmental performance of digestate-based biofertilizers. This research highlights the potential of biofertilizers to contribute to more sustainable agricultural practices when the production process is well-optimized.
期刊介绍:
ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation.
ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation.
ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation.
Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues.
Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.