{"title":"探讨中美紧张关系对创新产出的影响:两国金融部门的调节作用","authors":"Che Fang , Runguo Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The escalating geopolitical tensions between the United States and China have sparked considerable debate about their implications for global innovation and economic stability. This study examines the impact of these tensions on innovation performance, specifically focusing on trademark output and exports of information and communication technology products. It further explores how financial sector development moderates this relationship. Using annual data from 1993 to 2023 and applying Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) estimation techniques, the findings reveal that United States–China tensions positively influence innovation outputs in both countries. Specifically, a one-unit increase in geopolitical tension is associated with a 0.005–0.006 increase in trademark output and a 0.008–0.010 rise in information and communication technology exports. Financial sector development independently contributes positively to innovation; however, its interaction with geopolitical tensions exhibits divergent effects. In the United States, financial development strengthens the positive impact of tensions on innovation. In contrast, for China, the interaction term is significantly negative (−0.331 to −0.427), suggesting that financial sector development may exacerbate the adverse effects of geopolitical uncertainty on innovation. These findings highlight the complex, country-specific dynamics between finance, innovation, and global political relations. The study offers critical insights for policymakers in both countries, urging tailored financial and innovation policies in the face of sustained geopolitical rivalry.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 103061"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the impact of US-China tensions on innovation outputs: The moderating role of the financial sectors in both countries\",\"authors\":\"Che Fang , Runguo Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The escalating geopolitical tensions between the United States and China have sparked considerable debate about their implications for global innovation and economic stability. This study examines the impact of these tensions on innovation performance, specifically focusing on trademark output and exports of information and communication technology products. It further explores how financial sector development moderates this relationship. Using annual data from 1993 to 2023 and applying Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) estimation techniques, the findings reveal that United States–China tensions positively influence innovation outputs in both countries. Specifically, a one-unit increase in geopolitical tension is associated with a 0.005–0.006 increase in trademark output and a 0.008–0.010 rise in information and communication technology exports. Financial sector development independently contributes positively to innovation; however, its interaction with geopolitical tensions exhibits divergent effects. In the United States, financial development strengthens the positive impact of tensions on innovation. In contrast, for China, the interaction term is significantly negative (−0.331 to −0.427), suggesting that financial sector development may exacerbate the adverse effects of geopolitical uncertainty on innovation. These findings highlight the complex, country-specific dynamics between finance, innovation, and global political relations. The study offers critical insights for policymakers in both countries, urging tailored financial and innovation policies in the face of sustained geopolitical rivalry.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology in Society\",\"volume\":\"84 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002519\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25002519","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the impact of US-China tensions on innovation outputs: The moderating role of the financial sectors in both countries
The escalating geopolitical tensions between the United States and China have sparked considerable debate about their implications for global innovation and economic stability. This study examines the impact of these tensions on innovation performance, specifically focusing on trademark output and exports of information and communication technology products. It further explores how financial sector development moderates this relationship. Using annual data from 1993 to 2023 and applying Fully Modified Ordinary Least Squares (FMOLS) and Dynamic Ordinary Least Squares (DOLS) estimation techniques, the findings reveal that United States–China tensions positively influence innovation outputs in both countries. Specifically, a one-unit increase in geopolitical tension is associated with a 0.005–0.006 increase in trademark output and a 0.008–0.010 rise in information and communication technology exports. Financial sector development independently contributes positively to innovation; however, its interaction with geopolitical tensions exhibits divergent effects. In the United States, financial development strengthens the positive impact of tensions on innovation. In contrast, for China, the interaction term is significantly negative (−0.331 to −0.427), suggesting that financial sector development may exacerbate the adverse effects of geopolitical uncertainty on innovation. These findings highlight the complex, country-specific dynamics between finance, innovation, and global political relations. The study offers critical insights for policymakers in both countries, urging tailored financial and innovation policies in the face of sustained geopolitical rivalry.
期刊介绍:
Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.