态度和注意力在亲环境决策中的作用:一项眼动追踪研究

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Zoé Bollen , Annika M. Wyss , Emmanuel Guizar Rosales , Zarah Le Houcq Corbi , Daria Knoch
{"title":"态度和注意力在亲环境决策中的作用:一项眼动追踪研究","authors":"Zoé Bollen ,&nbsp;Annika M. Wyss ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Guizar Rosales ,&nbsp;Zarah Le Houcq Corbi ,&nbsp;Daria Knoch","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Encouraging environmentally sustainable lifestyles demands a deeper understanding of the processes underlying pro-environmental decision-making. This study investigates the role of environmental attitudes and attentional processes using eye-tracking technology during a decision-making task that involves real trade-offs between personal financial rewards and environmental consequences. We found partial evidence that stronger environmental attitudes – derived from the Campbell paradigm, but not from biospheric values – predicted an attentional prioritization of environmental information (i.e., carbon emissions). Specifically, stronger Campbellian attitudes were associated with a higher proportion of fixation time on this information, and an increasing likelihood of fixating this information first once participants became familiar with the task. However, the former effect may partly reflect gender-related differences in ecological considerations. The attention-behavior link appears context-dependent, influenced by factors such as the magnitude of financial incentives and environmental stakes. Our findings suggest that, while attentional processes may play a significant role in less financially rewarding pro-environmental decisions, they do not predict those with high financial stakes. These insights underscore the importance of considering both attentional dynamics and decision context in developing strategies to promote pro-environmental choices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102776"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of attitudes and attention in pro-environmental decision-making: An eye-tracking study\",\"authors\":\"Zoé Bollen ,&nbsp;Annika M. Wyss ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Guizar Rosales ,&nbsp;Zarah Le Houcq Corbi ,&nbsp;Daria Knoch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Encouraging environmentally sustainable lifestyles demands a deeper understanding of the processes underlying pro-environmental decision-making. This study investigates the role of environmental attitudes and attentional processes using eye-tracking technology during a decision-making task that involves real trade-offs between personal financial rewards and environmental consequences. We found partial evidence that stronger environmental attitudes – derived from the Campbell paradigm, but not from biospheric values – predicted an attentional prioritization of environmental information (i.e., carbon emissions). Specifically, stronger Campbellian attitudes were associated with a higher proportion of fixation time on this information, and an increasing likelihood of fixating this information first once participants became familiar with the task. However, the former effect may partly reflect gender-related differences in ecological considerations. The attention-behavior link appears context-dependent, influenced by factors such as the magnitude of financial incentives and environmental stakes. Our findings suggest that, while attentional processes may play a significant role in less financially rewarding pro-environmental decisions, they do not predict those with high financial stakes. These insights underscore the importance of considering both attentional dynamics and decision context in developing strategies to promote pro-environmental choices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102776\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002592\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002592","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鼓励环境可持续的生活方式需要对支持环境的决策过程有更深入的了解。本研究利用眼动追踪技术调查了环境态度和注意力过程在一个涉及个人经济回报和环境后果之间真实权衡的决策任务中的作用。我们发现了部分证据,表明更强烈的环境态度——来自坎贝尔范式,而不是来自生物圈价值——预示着对环境信息(即碳排放)的关注优先级。具体来说,坎贝尔态度越强,对该信息的固定时间越长,一旦参与者熟悉了任务,首先固定该信息的可能性就越大。然而,前一种效应可能部分反映了生态考虑方面的性别差异。注意-行为之间的联系似乎依赖于环境,受到诸如经济激励和环境风险大小等因素的影响。我们的研究结果表明,虽然注意力过程可能在经济回报较低的亲环境决策中发挥重要作用,但它们并不能预测那些经济利益较高的决策。这些见解强调了在制定促进亲环境选择的战略时考虑注意动力学和决策背景的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of attitudes and attention in pro-environmental decision-making: An eye-tracking study
Encouraging environmentally sustainable lifestyles demands a deeper understanding of the processes underlying pro-environmental decision-making. This study investigates the role of environmental attitudes and attentional processes using eye-tracking technology during a decision-making task that involves real trade-offs between personal financial rewards and environmental consequences. We found partial evidence that stronger environmental attitudes – derived from the Campbell paradigm, but not from biospheric values – predicted an attentional prioritization of environmental information (i.e., carbon emissions). Specifically, stronger Campbellian attitudes were associated with a higher proportion of fixation time on this information, and an increasing likelihood of fixating this information first once participants became familiar with the task. However, the former effect may partly reflect gender-related differences in ecological considerations. The attention-behavior link appears context-dependent, influenced by factors such as the magnitude of financial incentives and environmental stakes. Our findings suggest that, while attentional processes may play a significant role in less financially rewarding pro-environmental decisions, they do not predict those with high financial stakes. These insights underscore the importance of considering both attentional dynamics and decision context in developing strategies to promote pro-environmental choices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信