Clara Kühner , Maie Stein , Hannes Zacher , Mona Weiss
{"title":"员工环境声音塑造环境态度和绿色组织氛围(反之亦然):一项为期一年的五波纵向研究","authors":"Clara Kühner , Maie Stein , Hannes Zacher , Mona Weiss","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To achieve environmental sustainability goals, organizations depend on employees speaking up with suggestions and concerns about environmental issues (i.e., environmental voice). However, the individual and organizational predictors and outcomes of environmental voice remain largely unclear. Building on theorizing on pro-environmental behavior and proactivity, we propose that environmental attitudes and green organizational climate are positively related to subsequent environmental voice. We further expect that environmental voice is positively related to subsequent environmental attitudes and green organizational climate. We tested our preregistered hypotheses using data collected at five measurement points with 3-month time lags across one year among <em>n</em> = 1550 employees in Germany. We analyzed the data with random intercept cross-lagged panel models to explore reciprocal within-person dynamics. Results at the within-person level showed that increased engagement in promotive environmental voice (i.e., voicing suggestions) predicted subsequently higher levels of environmental attitudes. In contrast to our expectations, increased prohibitive environmental voice (i.e., expressing concerns) predicted subsequently lower levels of environmental attitudes. Furthermore, increased promotive environmental voice, but not prohibitive environmental voice, predicted subsequently higher levels of green organizational climate. Environmental attitudes and green organizational climate were not significantly related to subsequent environmental voice. Overall, these findings suggest that environmental voice may play an important role in strengthening environmental attitudes and “greening” the organizational climate, but that these attitudes and climate perceptions may not predict environmental voice over the following three months.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102756"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employee environmental voice shapes environmental attitudes and green organizational climate (but not vice versa): A 1-year, 5-wave longitudinal study\",\"authors\":\"Clara Kühner , Maie Stein , Hannes Zacher , Mona Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To achieve environmental sustainability goals, organizations depend on employees speaking up with suggestions and concerns about environmental issues (i.e., environmental voice). However, the individual and organizational predictors and outcomes of environmental voice remain largely unclear. Building on theorizing on pro-environmental behavior and proactivity, we propose that environmental attitudes and green organizational climate are positively related to subsequent environmental voice. We further expect that environmental voice is positively related to subsequent environmental attitudes and green organizational climate. We tested our preregistered hypotheses using data collected at five measurement points with 3-month time lags across one year among <em>n</em> = 1550 employees in Germany. We analyzed the data with random intercept cross-lagged panel models to explore reciprocal within-person dynamics. Results at the within-person level showed that increased engagement in promotive environmental voice (i.e., voicing suggestions) predicted subsequently higher levels of environmental attitudes. In contrast to our expectations, increased prohibitive environmental voice (i.e., expressing concerns) predicted subsequently lower levels of environmental attitudes. Furthermore, increased promotive environmental voice, but not prohibitive environmental voice, predicted subsequently higher levels of green organizational climate. Environmental attitudes and green organizational climate were not significantly related to subsequent environmental voice. Overall, these findings suggest that environmental voice may play an important role in strengthening environmental attitudes and “greening” the organizational climate, but that these attitudes and climate perceptions may not predict environmental voice over the following three months.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002397\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002397","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Employee environmental voice shapes environmental attitudes and green organizational climate (but not vice versa): A 1-year, 5-wave longitudinal study
To achieve environmental sustainability goals, organizations depend on employees speaking up with suggestions and concerns about environmental issues (i.e., environmental voice). However, the individual and organizational predictors and outcomes of environmental voice remain largely unclear. Building on theorizing on pro-environmental behavior and proactivity, we propose that environmental attitudes and green organizational climate are positively related to subsequent environmental voice. We further expect that environmental voice is positively related to subsequent environmental attitudes and green organizational climate. We tested our preregistered hypotheses using data collected at five measurement points with 3-month time lags across one year among n = 1550 employees in Germany. We analyzed the data with random intercept cross-lagged panel models to explore reciprocal within-person dynamics. Results at the within-person level showed that increased engagement in promotive environmental voice (i.e., voicing suggestions) predicted subsequently higher levels of environmental attitudes. In contrast to our expectations, increased prohibitive environmental voice (i.e., expressing concerns) predicted subsequently lower levels of environmental attitudes. Furthermore, increased promotive environmental voice, but not prohibitive environmental voice, predicted subsequently higher levels of green organizational climate. Environmental attitudes and green organizational climate were not significantly related to subsequent environmental voice. Overall, these findings suggest that environmental voice may play an important role in strengthening environmental attitudes and “greening” the organizational climate, but that these attitudes and climate perceptions may not predict environmental voice over the following three months.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space