员工环境声音塑造环境态度和绿色组织氛围(反之亦然):一项为期一年的五波纵向研究

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Clara Kühner , Maie Stein , Hannes Zacher , Mona Weiss
{"title":"员工环境声音塑造环境态度和绿色组织氛围(反之亦然):一项为期一年的五波纵向研究","authors":"Clara Kühner ,&nbsp;Maie Stein ,&nbsp;Hannes Zacher ,&nbsp;Mona Weiss","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To achieve environmental sustainability goals, organizations depend on employees speaking up with suggestions and concerns about environmental issues (i.e., environmental voice). However, the individual and organizational predictors and outcomes of environmental voice remain largely unclear. Building on theorizing on pro-environmental behavior and proactivity, we propose that environmental attitudes and green organizational climate are positively related to subsequent environmental voice. We further expect that environmental voice is positively related to subsequent environmental attitudes and green organizational climate. We tested our preregistered hypotheses using data collected at five measurement points with 3-month time lags across one year among <em>n</em> = 1550 employees in Germany. We analyzed the data with random intercept cross-lagged panel models to explore reciprocal within-person dynamics. Results at the within-person level showed that increased engagement in promotive environmental voice (i.e., voicing suggestions) predicted subsequently higher levels of environmental attitudes. In contrast to our expectations, increased prohibitive environmental voice (i.e., expressing concerns) predicted subsequently lower levels of environmental attitudes. Furthermore, increased promotive environmental voice, but not prohibitive environmental voice, predicted subsequently higher levels of green organizational climate. Environmental attitudes and green organizational climate were not significantly related to subsequent environmental voice. Overall, these findings suggest that environmental voice may play an important role in strengthening environmental attitudes and “greening” the organizational climate, but that these attitudes and climate perceptions may not predict environmental voice over the following three months.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 102756"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employee environmental voice shapes environmental attitudes and green organizational climate (but not vice versa): A 1-year, 5-wave longitudinal study\",\"authors\":\"Clara Kühner ,&nbsp;Maie Stein ,&nbsp;Hannes Zacher ,&nbsp;Mona Weiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To achieve environmental sustainability goals, organizations depend on employees speaking up with suggestions and concerns about environmental issues (i.e., environmental voice). However, the individual and organizational predictors and outcomes of environmental voice remain largely unclear. Building on theorizing on pro-environmental behavior and proactivity, we propose that environmental attitudes and green organizational climate are positively related to subsequent environmental voice. We further expect that environmental voice is positively related to subsequent environmental attitudes and green organizational climate. We tested our preregistered hypotheses using data collected at five measurement points with 3-month time lags across one year among <em>n</em> = 1550 employees in Germany. We analyzed the data with random intercept cross-lagged panel models to explore reciprocal within-person dynamics. Results at the within-person level showed that increased engagement in promotive environmental voice (i.e., voicing suggestions) predicted subsequently higher levels of environmental attitudes. In contrast to our expectations, increased prohibitive environmental voice (i.e., expressing concerns) predicted subsequently lower levels of environmental attitudes. Furthermore, increased promotive environmental voice, but not prohibitive environmental voice, predicted subsequently higher levels of green organizational climate. Environmental attitudes and green organizational climate were not significantly related to subsequent environmental voice. Overall, these findings suggest that environmental voice may play an important role in strengthening environmental attitudes and “greening” the organizational climate, but that these attitudes and climate perceptions may not predict environmental voice over the following three months.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102756\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002397\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002397","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了实现环境可持续性目标,组织依靠员工对环境问题提出建议和关注(即环境声音)。然而,个人和组织环境声音的预测因素和结果在很大程度上仍然不清楚。在对亲环境行为和主动性进行理论分析的基础上,我们提出环境态度和绿色组织气候与随后的环境声音呈正相关。我们进一步期望环境声音与随后的环境态度和绿色组织气候呈正相关。我们使用在德国n = 1550名员工中收集的5个测量点收集的数据对预注册的假设进行了测试,这些数据在一年中有3个月的时间滞后。我们用随机截距交叉滞后面板模型分析了数据,以探索相互的内部动态。在个人层面上的结果表明,促进环境声音(即发声建议)的参与增加预示着随后更高水平的环境态度。与我们的预期相反,越来越多的环境声音(即表达担忧)预示着随后更低水平的环境态度。此外,促进性环境声音的增加,而不是禁止性环境声音,预示着随后更高水平的绿色组织气候。环境态度和绿色组织氛围对后续环境声音的影响不显著。总体而言,这些研究结果表明,环境声音可能在加强环境态度和“绿化”组织气候方面发挥重要作用,但这些态度和气候感知可能无法预测接下来三个月的环境声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Employee environmental voice shapes environmental attitudes and green organizational climate (but not vice versa): A 1-year, 5-wave longitudinal study
To achieve environmental sustainability goals, organizations depend on employees speaking up with suggestions and concerns about environmental issues (i.e., environmental voice). However, the individual and organizational predictors and outcomes of environmental voice remain largely unclear. Building on theorizing on pro-environmental behavior and proactivity, we propose that environmental attitudes and green organizational climate are positively related to subsequent environmental voice. We further expect that environmental voice is positively related to subsequent environmental attitudes and green organizational climate. We tested our preregistered hypotheses using data collected at five measurement points with 3-month time lags across one year among n = 1550 employees in Germany. We analyzed the data with random intercept cross-lagged panel models to explore reciprocal within-person dynamics. Results at the within-person level showed that increased engagement in promotive environmental voice (i.e., voicing suggestions) predicted subsequently higher levels of environmental attitudes. In contrast to our expectations, increased prohibitive environmental voice (i.e., expressing concerns) predicted subsequently lower levels of environmental attitudes. Furthermore, increased promotive environmental voice, but not prohibitive environmental voice, predicted subsequently higher levels of green organizational climate. Environmental attitudes and green organizational climate were not significantly related to subsequent environmental voice. Overall, these findings suggest that environmental voice may play an important role in strengthening environmental attitudes and “greening” the organizational climate, but that these attitudes and climate perceptions may not predict environmental voice over the following three months.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信