Joana Azevedo , Pedro Fonseca , Adérito Seixas , José Oliveira , João Paulo Vilas-Boas
{"title":"膝关节位置感评估中的肌肉协同激活:肌肉疲劳的影响和误差和方向偏差的大小的含义","authors":"Joana Azevedo , Pedro Fonseca , Adérito Seixas , José Oliveira , João Paulo Vilas-Boas","doi":"10.1016/j.jelekin.2025.103072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to describe muscle coactivation during knee joint-position sense (KJPS) assessments in healthy individuals, before and after muscle fatigue, and to analyse the implications for the magnitude of errors and directional bias.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The KJPS of 21 healthy males was assessed in the sitting position through concentric (SIT_CC) and eccentric repositionings (SIT_ECC) to 45° of knee flexion. Two fatigue protocols were tested, consisting of concentric contractions of the knee extensors or flexors. Muscle coactivation indices were calculated based on the normalized mean activation of the <em>vastus lateralis</em> and <em>biceps femoris</em> muscles. Absolute and relative errors were calculated to group participants by magnitude of errors (lower vs. higher errors) and directional bias (extension vs. flexion).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Coactivation indices ranged between 74.92 % - 98.43 %. Significant overall decrease in coactivation indices after both fatigue protocols (<em>p</em> < 0.05). No significant differences in coactivation were found between magnitude of errors groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05), but significant higher coactivation were observed in participants failing the target position into flexion, only in the SIT_CC test (0.001 < <em>p</em> < 0.042).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Muscle coactivation between knee extensors and flexors was high in the assessed JPS tests, and decreased after fatigue. Muscle coactivation does not appear to explain the magnitude of errors, while it seems to influence directional bias.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 103072"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muscle coactivation during knee joint-position sense assessments: the effect of muscle fatigue and implications for the magnitude of errors and directional bias\",\"authors\":\"Joana Azevedo , Pedro Fonseca , Adérito Seixas , José Oliveira , João Paulo Vilas-Boas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jelekin.2025.103072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to describe muscle coactivation during knee joint-position sense (KJPS) assessments in healthy individuals, before and after muscle fatigue, and to analyse the implications for the magnitude of errors and directional bias.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The KJPS of 21 healthy males was assessed in the sitting position through concentric (SIT_CC) and eccentric repositionings (SIT_ECC) to 45° of knee flexion. Two fatigue protocols were tested, consisting of concentric contractions of the knee extensors or flexors. Muscle coactivation indices were calculated based on the normalized mean activation of the <em>vastus lateralis</em> and <em>biceps femoris</em> muscles. Absolute and relative errors were calculated to group participants by magnitude of errors (lower vs. higher errors) and directional bias (extension vs. flexion).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Coactivation indices ranged between 74.92 % - 98.43 %. Significant overall decrease in coactivation indices after both fatigue protocols (<em>p</em> < 0.05). No significant differences in coactivation were found between magnitude of errors groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05), but significant higher coactivation were observed in participants failing the target position into flexion, only in the SIT_CC test (0.001 < <em>p</em> < 0.042).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Muscle coactivation between knee extensors and flexors was high in the assessed JPS tests, and decreased after fatigue. Muscle coactivation does not appear to explain the magnitude of errors, while it seems to influence directional bias.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56123,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103072\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641125000987\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1050641125000987","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Muscle coactivation during knee joint-position sense assessments: the effect of muscle fatigue and implications for the magnitude of errors and directional bias
Purpose
This study aimed to describe muscle coactivation during knee joint-position sense (KJPS) assessments in healthy individuals, before and after muscle fatigue, and to analyse the implications for the magnitude of errors and directional bias.
Methods
The KJPS of 21 healthy males was assessed in the sitting position through concentric (SIT_CC) and eccentric repositionings (SIT_ECC) to 45° of knee flexion. Two fatigue protocols were tested, consisting of concentric contractions of the knee extensors or flexors. Muscle coactivation indices were calculated based on the normalized mean activation of the vastus lateralis and biceps femoris muscles. Absolute and relative errors were calculated to group participants by magnitude of errors (lower vs. higher errors) and directional bias (extension vs. flexion).
Results
Coactivation indices ranged between 74.92 % - 98.43 %. Significant overall decrease in coactivation indices after both fatigue protocols (p < 0.05). No significant differences in coactivation were found between magnitude of errors groups (p > 0.05), but significant higher coactivation were observed in participants failing the target position into flexion, only in the SIT_CC test (0.001 < p < 0.042).
Conclusion
Muscle coactivation between knee extensors and flexors was high in the assessed JPS tests, and decreased after fatigue. Muscle coactivation does not appear to explain the magnitude of errors, while it seems to influence directional bias.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology is the primary source for outstanding original articles on the study of human movement from muscle contraction via its motor units and sensory system to integrated motion through mechanical and electrical detection techniques.
As the official publication of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, the journal is dedicated to publishing the best work in all areas of electromyography and kinesiology, including: control of movement, muscle fatigue, muscle and nerve properties, joint biomechanics and electrical stimulation. Applications in rehabilitation, sports & exercise, motion analysis, ergonomics, alternative & complimentary medicine, measures of human performance and technical articles on electromyographic signal processing are welcome.