IgG抗pf4 /H化学发光免疫分析法诊断肝素性血小板减少症的价值

Carla Rial ∗ , Nicolas Gendron ∗ , Christine Le Beller , Shaya Sable , Aurélie Sarthou , Laetitia Mauge , Justine Piazza , Roya Nili , Maude Laney , Isabelle Presot , Jean-Luc Diehl , Anne Godier , Agnès Lillo-Le Louet , David M. Smadja , Dominique Helley
{"title":"IgG抗pf4 /H化学发光免疫分析法诊断肝素性血小板减少症的价值","authors":"Carla Rial ∗ ,&nbsp;Nicolas Gendron ∗ ,&nbsp;Christine Le Beller ,&nbsp;Shaya Sable ,&nbsp;Aurélie Sarthou ,&nbsp;Laetitia Mauge ,&nbsp;Justine Piazza ,&nbsp;Roya Nili ,&nbsp;Maude Laney ,&nbsp;Isabelle Presot ,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Diehl ,&nbsp;Anne Godier ,&nbsp;Agnès Lillo-Le Louet ,&nbsp;David M. Smadja ,&nbsp;Dominique Helley","doi":"10.1016/j.bvth.2025.100084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening complication of heparin therapy, mediated by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies targeting platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) complexes. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is critical to ensure appropriate treatment and improve outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the rapid chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG (Werfen) for detecting IgG anti-PF4/H antibodies for HIT diagnosis compared with the Zymutest HIA IgG (Hyphen BioMed) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This single-center retrospective cohort included all patients with suspected HIT (4Ts score &gt;3). CLIA and ELISA were performed and compared, and results were evaluated against the serotonin-release assay. We included 113 patients with suspected HIT, and HIT was confirmed in 43 (38.1%). Discordant results occurred in 5 patients (4.4%) with confirmed HIT: 3 patients had positive ELISA and negative CLIA, one had both negative ELISA and CLIA, and one had negative ELISA and positive CLIA. CLIA demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy, with a sensitivity of 90.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.0-99.4) and specificity of 80.0% (95% CI, 70.6-89.3). ELISA showed a sensitivity of 95.3% (95% CI, 89.1-100.0) and negative predictive value of 96.3% (95% CI, 91.3-100.0) compared with 93.3% (95% CI, 87.0-99.6) for CLIA. No significant difference was observed between the 2 tests for sensitivity or specificity. Positive and negative percent agreements were 86.4% (95% CI, 77.7-95.2) and 96.3% (95% CI, 91.3-101.3), respectively. Overall percent agreement was 91.2% (95% CI, 85.9-96.4). This study supports the utility of CLIA as a rapid diagnostic tool for HIT optimizing clinical decision-making and patient management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100190,"journal":{"name":"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of an IgG anti-PF4/H chemiluminescent immunoassay in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia\",\"authors\":\"Carla Rial ∗ ,&nbsp;Nicolas Gendron ∗ ,&nbsp;Christine Le Beller ,&nbsp;Shaya Sable ,&nbsp;Aurélie Sarthou ,&nbsp;Laetitia Mauge ,&nbsp;Justine Piazza ,&nbsp;Roya Nili ,&nbsp;Maude Laney ,&nbsp;Isabelle Presot ,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Diehl ,&nbsp;Anne Godier ,&nbsp;Agnès Lillo-Le Louet ,&nbsp;David M. Smadja ,&nbsp;Dominique Helley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bvth.2025.100084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening complication of heparin therapy, mediated by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies targeting platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) complexes. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is critical to ensure appropriate treatment and improve outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the rapid chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG (Werfen) for detecting IgG anti-PF4/H antibodies for HIT diagnosis compared with the Zymutest HIA IgG (Hyphen BioMed) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This single-center retrospective cohort included all patients with suspected HIT (4Ts score &gt;3). CLIA and ELISA were performed and compared, and results were evaluated against the serotonin-release assay. We included 113 patients with suspected HIT, and HIT was confirmed in 43 (38.1%). Discordant results occurred in 5 patients (4.4%) with confirmed HIT: 3 patients had positive ELISA and negative CLIA, one had both negative ELISA and CLIA, and one had negative ELISA and positive CLIA. CLIA demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy, with a sensitivity of 90.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.0-99.4) and specificity of 80.0% (95% CI, 70.6-89.3). ELISA showed a sensitivity of 95.3% (95% CI, 89.1-100.0) and negative predictive value of 96.3% (95% CI, 91.3-100.0) compared with 93.3% (95% CI, 87.0-99.6) for CLIA. No significant difference was observed between the 2 tests for sensitivity or specificity. Positive and negative percent agreements were 86.4% (95% CI, 77.7-95.2) and 96.3% (95% CI, 91.3-101.3), respectively. Overall percent agreement was 91.2% (95% CI, 85.9-96.4). This study supports the utility of CLIA as a rapid diagnostic tool for HIT optimizing clinical decision-making and patient management.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950327225000415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Vessels, Thrombosis & Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950327225000415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)是肝素治疗的一种危及生命的并发症,由靶向血小板因子4/肝素(PF4/H)复合物的免疫球蛋白G (IgG)抗体介导。及时和准确的诊断对于确保适当治疗和改善结果至关重要。我们旨在比较快速化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA) haemsil AcuStar HIT-IgG (Werfen)检测抗pf4 /H抗体的效果,并与Zymutest HIA IgG (Hyphen BioMed)酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)进行比较。该单中心回顾性队列包括所有疑似HIT患者(4Ts评分>;3)。CLIA和ELISA进行比较,并将结果与血清素释放试验进行评估。我们纳入了113例疑似HIT患者,其中43例(38.1%)被确诊为HIT。确诊HIT患者5例(4.4%)出现不一致结果:ELISA阳性、CLIA阴性3例,ELISA和CLIA均阴性1例,ELISA阴性、CLIA阳性1例。CLIA具有较高的诊断准确性,敏感性为90.7%(95%置信区间[CI], 82.0-99.4),特异性为80.0% (95% CI, 70.6-89.3)。ELISA的敏感性为95.3% (95% CI, 89.1 ~ 100.0),阴性预测值为96.3% (95% CI, 91.3 ~ 100.0),而CLIA的阴性预测值为93.3% (95% CI, 87.0 ~ 99.6)。两种检测方法的敏感性和特异性均无显著差异。阳性和阴性百分比分别为86.4% (95% CI, 77.7-95.2)和96.3% (95% CI, 91.3-101.3)。总体同意率为91.2% (95% CI, 85.9-96.4)。本研究支持CLIA作为HIT优化临床决策和患者管理的快速诊断工具的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of an IgG anti-PF4/H chemiluminescent immunoassay in the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Abstract

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a life-threatening complication of heparin therapy, mediated by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies targeting platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H) complexes. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is critical to ensure appropriate treatment and improve outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the rapid chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG (Werfen) for detecting IgG anti-PF4/H antibodies for HIT diagnosis compared with the Zymutest HIA IgG (Hyphen BioMed) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This single-center retrospective cohort included all patients with suspected HIT (4Ts score >3). CLIA and ELISA were performed and compared, and results were evaluated against the serotonin-release assay. We included 113 patients with suspected HIT, and HIT was confirmed in 43 (38.1%). Discordant results occurred in 5 patients (4.4%) with confirmed HIT: 3 patients had positive ELISA and negative CLIA, one had both negative ELISA and CLIA, and one had negative ELISA and positive CLIA. CLIA demonstrated a high diagnostic accuracy, with a sensitivity of 90.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.0-99.4) and specificity of 80.0% (95% CI, 70.6-89.3). ELISA showed a sensitivity of 95.3% (95% CI, 89.1-100.0) and negative predictive value of 96.3% (95% CI, 91.3-100.0) compared with 93.3% (95% CI, 87.0-99.6) for CLIA. No significant difference was observed between the 2 tests for sensitivity or specificity. Positive and negative percent agreements were 86.4% (95% CI, 77.7-95.2) and 96.3% (95% CI, 91.3-101.3), respectively. Overall percent agreement was 91.2% (95% CI, 85.9-96.4). This study supports the utility of CLIA as a rapid diagnostic tool for HIT optimizing clinical decision-making and patient management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信