部分co2溶表面活性剂浓度对泡沫强度的影响

IF 4.6 0 ENERGY & FUELS
Albert Barrabino , Helene Berntsen Auflem , Mohammad Masoudi , Torleif Holt , Bård Bjørkvik , Alv-Arne Grimstad
{"title":"部分co2溶表面活性剂浓度对泡沫强度的影响","authors":"Albert Barrabino ,&nbsp;Helene Berntsen Auflem ,&nbsp;Mohammad Masoudi ,&nbsp;Torleif Holt ,&nbsp;Bård Bjørkvik ,&nbsp;Alv-Arne Grimstad","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Injection of CO<sub>2</sub> foam is an emerging technology for CO<sub>2</sub> mobility control. When searching for suitable surfactant system for maximum effect of the foam application it is necessary to consider deployment methods (dissolved in brine or in CO<sub>2</sub>) and ways to avoid loss of foam strength away from the injection well. Loss of strength is partially related to concentration depletion caused by surfactant adsorption and partitioning into formation brine.</div><div>Here, two non-ionic surfactants with different CO<sub>2</sub> solubilities were studied in steady-state core flooding experiments with co-injection of CO<sub>2</sub> and surfactant solution with varying concentrations. For each surfactant concentration apparent viscosities were calculated from the measured differential pressures.</div><div>The surfactant Brij L23 had a low partition coefficient at the experimental conditions used, meaning that little surfactant was found in the CO<sub>2</sub>. With this surfactant, foam was formed for low concentrations. The other surfactant, Tergitol TMN 10, was more CO<sub>2</sub> soluble, and the partition coefficient increased when the pressure was increased. As a result of the pressure increase more surfactant partitioned into the CO<sub>2</sub> and a higher concentration of surfactant was needed to form strong foam.</div><div>The experimental observations are explained as a result of the surfactant partitioning and are related to the critical micelle concentration of surfactant in brine. Additional measurements were made to characterise the rheology of the CO<sub>2</sub>-brine interface for the different surfactant systems. It was shown that the interface was more flexible for the systems and conditions where strong foam was observed in the core flooding tests.</div><div>The observation that surfactant systems with stronger partitioning into CO<sub>2</sub> required higher concentrations to form strong foam, and also collapsed more rapidly for decreasing surfactant concentrations, seems to reject a proposition that high CO<sub>2</sub> solubility is favourable for expanding the reservoir zone where foam is generated. This indicates that the search for methods for effective CO<sub>2</sub> mobility control should concentrate on surfactants that are mainly water soluble.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 214223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the concentration of commercial partially CO2-soluble surfactants on foam strength\",\"authors\":\"Albert Barrabino ,&nbsp;Helene Berntsen Auflem ,&nbsp;Mohammad Masoudi ,&nbsp;Torleif Holt ,&nbsp;Bård Bjørkvik ,&nbsp;Alv-Arne Grimstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Injection of CO<sub>2</sub> foam is an emerging technology for CO<sub>2</sub> mobility control. When searching for suitable surfactant system for maximum effect of the foam application it is necessary to consider deployment methods (dissolved in brine or in CO<sub>2</sub>) and ways to avoid loss of foam strength away from the injection well. Loss of strength is partially related to concentration depletion caused by surfactant adsorption and partitioning into formation brine.</div><div>Here, two non-ionic surfactants with different CO<sub>2</sub> solubilities were studied in steady-state core flooding experiments with co-injection of CO<sub>2</sub> and surfactant solution with varying concentrations. For each surfactant concentration apparent viscosities were calculated from the measured differential pressures.</div><div>The surfactant Brij L23 had a low partition coefficient at the experimental conditions used, meaning that little surfactant was found in the CO<sub>2</sub>. With this surfactant, foam was formed for low concentrations. The other surfactant, Tergitol TMN 10, was more CO<sub>2</sub> soluble, and the partition coefficient increased when the pressure was increased. As a result of the pressure increase more surfactant partitioned into the CO<sub>2</sub> and a higher concentration of surfactant was needed to form strong foam.</div><div>The experimental observations are explained as a result of the surfactant partitioning and are related to the critical micelle concentration of surfactant in brine. Additional measurements were made to characterise the rheology of the CO<sub>2</sub>-brine interface for the different surfactant systems. It was shown that the interface was more flexible for the systems and conditions where strong foam was observed in the core flooding tests.</div><div>The observation that surfactant systems with stronger partitioning into CO<sub>2</sub> required higher concentrations to form strong foam, and also collapsed more rapidly for decreasing surfactant concentrations, seems to reject a proposition that high CO<sub>2</sub> solubility is favourable for expanding the reservoir zone where foam is generated. This indicates that the search for methods for effective CO<sub>2</sub> mobility control should concentrate on surfactants that are mainly water soluble.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 214223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025005810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025005810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

二氧化碳泡沫注入是一项新兴的二氧化碳流动性控制技术。在寻找合适的表面活性剂体系以获得最大的泡沫效果时,有必要考虑部署方法(溶解在盐水或二氧化碳中)以及避免泡沫强度在注入井之外损失的方法。强度损失部分与表面活性剂吸附和分配到地层卤水中引起的浓度下降有关。本文研究了两种不同CO2溶解度的非离子型表面活性剂,在不同浓度CO2和表面活性剂溶液共注入的稳态岩心驱油实验中。根据测得的压差,计算了不同表面活性剂浓度的表观粘度。在实验条件下,表面活性剂Brij L23具有较低的分配系数,这意味着CO2中几乎没有表面活性剂。这种表面活性剂在低浓度下可形成泡沫。另一种表面活性剂tergiitol tmn10的CO2可溶性更强,分配系数随压力的增加而增大。由于压力的增加,更多的表面活性剂被分配到二氧化碳中,形成强泡沫需要更高浓度的表面活性剂。实验结果解释为表面活性剂分配的结果,并与盐水中表面活性剂的临界胶束浓度有关。对不同表面活性剂体系的co2 -盐水界面流变特性进行了额外的测量。结果表明,在岩心注水试验中观察到强泡沫的体系和条件下,界面更加灵活。表面活性剂体系对二氧化碳的分解更强,需要更高的浓度才能形成强泡沫,并且随着表面活性剂浓度的降低,崩塌得更快,这一观察结果似乎否定了二氧化碳的高溶解度有利于扩大产生泡沫的储层的观点。这表明,寻找有效的控制二氧化碳迁移率的方法应该集中在主要是水溶性的表面活性剂上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of the concentration of commercial partially CO2-soluble surfactants on foam strength
Injection of CO2 foam is an emerging technology for CO2 mobility control. When searching for suitable surfactant system for maximum effect of the foam application it is necessary to consider deployment methods (dissolved in brine or in CO2) and ways to avoid loss of foam strength away from the injection well. Loss of strength is partially related to concentration depletion caused by surfactant adsorption and partitioning into formation brine.
Here, two non-ionic surfactants with different CO2 solubilities were studied in steady-state core flooding experiments with co-injection of CO2 and surfactant solution with varying concentrations. For each surfactant concentration apparent viscosities were calculated from the measured differential pressures.
The surfactant Brij L23 had a low partition coefficient at the experimental conditions used, meaning that little surfactant was found in the CO2. With this surfactant, foam was formed for low concentrations. The other surfactant, Tergitol TMN 10, was more CO2 soluble, and the partition coefficient increased when the pressure was increased. As a result of the pressure increase more surfactant partitioned into the CO2 and a higher concentration of surfactant was needed to form strong foam.
The experimental observations are explained as a result of the surfactant partitioning and are related to the critical micelle concentration of surfactant in brine. Additional measurements were made to characterise the rheology of the CO2-brine interface for the different surfactant systems. It was shown that the interface was more flexible for the systems and conditions where strong foam was observed in the core flooding tests.
The observation that surfactant systems with stronger partitioning into CO2 required higher concentrations to form strong foam, and also collapsed more rapidly for decreasing surfactant concentrations, seems to reject a proposition that high CO2 solubility is favourable for expanding the reservoir zone where foam is generated. This indicates that the search for methods for effective CO2 mobility control should concentrate on surfactants that are mainly water soluble.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信