Albert Barrabino , Helene Berntsen Auflem , Mohammad Masoudi , Torleif Holt , Bård Bjørkvik , Alv-Arne Grimstad
{"title":"部分co2溶表面活性剂浓度对泡沫强度的影响","authors":"Albert Barrabino , Helene Berntsen Auflem , Mohammad Masoudi , Torleif Holt , Bård Bjørkvik , Alv-Arne Grimstad","doi":"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Injection of CO<sub>2</sub> foam is an emerging technology for CO<sub>2</sub> mobility control. When searching for suitable surfactant system for maximum effect of the foam application it is necessary to consider deployment methods (dissolved in brine or in CO<sub>2</sub>) and ways to avoid loss of foam strength away from the injection well. Loss of strength is partially related to concentration depletion caused by surfactant adsorption and partitioning into formation brine.</div><div>Here, two non-ionic surfactants with different CO<sub>2</sub> solubilities were studied in steady-state core flooding experiments with co-injection of CO<sub>2</sub> and surfactant solution with varying concentrations. For each surfactant concentration apparent viscosities were calculated from the measured differential pressures.</div><div>The surfactant Brij L23 had a low partition coefficient at the experimental conditions used, meaning that little surfactant was found in the CO<sub>2</sub>. With this surfactant, foam was formed for low concentrations. The other surfactant, Tergitol TMN 10, was more CO<sub>2</sub> soluble, and the partition coefficient increased when the pressure was increased. As a result of the pressure increase more surfactant partitioned into the CO<sub>2</sub> and a higher concentration of surfactant was needed to form strong foam.</div><div>The experimental observations are explained as a result of the surfactant partitioning and are related to the critical micelle concentration of surfactant in brine. Additional measurements were made to characterise the rheology of the CO<sub>2</sub>-brine interface for the different surfactant systems. It was shown that the interface was more flexible for the systems and conditions where strong foam was observed in the core flooding tests.</div><div>The observation that surfactant systems with stronger partitioning into CO<sub>2</sub> required higher concentrations to form strong foam, and also collapsed more rapidly for decreasing surfactant concentrations, seems to reject a proposition that high CO<sub>2</sub> solubility is favourable for expanding the reservoir zone where foam is generated. This indicates that the search for methods for effective CO<sub>2</sub> mobility control should concentrate on surfactants that are mainly water soluble.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100578,"journal":{"name":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 214223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the concentration of commercial partially CO2-soluble surfactants on foam strength\",\"authors\":\"Albert Barrabino , Helene Berntsen Auflem , Mohammad Masoudi , Torleif Holt , Bård Bjørkvik , Alv-Arne Grimstad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Injection of CO<sub>2</sub> foam is an emerging technology for CO<sub>2</sub> mobility control. When searching for suitable surfactant system for maximum effect of the foam application it is necessary to consider deployment methods (dissolved in brine or in CO<sub>2</sub>) and ways to avoid loss of foam strength away from the injection well. Loss of strength is partially related to concentration depletion caused by surfactant adsorption and partitioning into formation brine.</div><div>Here, two non-ionic surfactants with different CO<sub>2</sub> solubilities were studied in steady-state core flooding experiments with co-injection of CO<sub>2</sub> and surfactant solution with varying concentrations. For each surfactant concentration apparent viscosities were calculated from the measured differential pressures.</div><div>The surfactant Brij L23 had a low partition coefficient at the experimental conditions used, meaning that little surfactant was found in the CO<sub>2</sub>. With this surfactant, foam was formed for low concentrations. The other surfactant, Tergitol TMN 10, was more CO<sub>2</sub> soluble, and the partition coefficient increased when the pressure was increased. As a result of the pressure increase more surfactant partitioned into the CO<sub>2</sub> and a higher concentration of surfactant was needed to form strong foam.</div><div>The experimental observations are explained as a result of the surfactant partitioning and are related to the critical micelle concentration of surfactant in brine. Additional measurements were made to characterise the rheology of the CO<sub>2</sub>-brine interface for the different surfactant systems. It was shown that the interface was more flexible for the systems and conditions where strong foam was observed in the core flooding tests.</div><div>The observation that surfactant systems with stronger partitioning into CO<sub>2</sub> required higher concentrations to form strong foam, and also collapsed more rapidly for decreasing surfactant concentrations, seems to reject a proposition that high CO<sub>2</sub> solubility is favourable for expanding the reservoir zone where foam is generated. This indicates that the search for methods for effective CO<sub>2</sub> mobility control should concentrate on surfactants that are mainly water soluble.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 214223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoenergy Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025005810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoenergy Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949891025005810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of the concentration of commercial partially CO2-soluble surfactants on foam strength
Injection of CO2 foam is an emerging technology for CO2 mobility control. When searching for suitable surfactant system for maximum effect of the foam application it is necessary to consider deployment methods (dissolved in brine or in CO2) and ways to avoid loss of foam strength away from the injection well. Loss of strength is partially related to concentration depletion caused by surfactant adsorption and partitioning into formation brine.
Here, two non-ionic surfactants with different CO2 solubilities were studied in steady-state core flooding experiments with co-injection of CO2 and surfactant solution with varying concentrations. For each surfactant concentration apparent viscosities were calculated from the measured differential pressures.
The surfactant Brij L23 had a low partition coefficient at the experimental conditions used, meaning that little surfactant was found in the CO2. With this surfactant, foam was formed for low concentrations. The other surfactant, Tergitol TMN 10, was more CO2 soluble, and the partition coefficient increased when the pressure was increased. As a result of the pressure increase more surfactant partitioned into the CO2 and a higher concentration of surfactant was needed to form strong foam.
The experimental observations are explained as a result of the surfactant partitioning and are related to the critical micelle concentration of surfactant in brine. Additional measurements were made to characterise the rheology of the CO2-brine interface for the different surfactant systems. It was shown that the interface was more flexible for the systems and conditions where strong foam was observed in the core flooding tests.
The observation that surfactant systems with stronger partitioning into CO2 required higher concentrations to form strong foam, and also collapsed more rapidly for decreasing surfactant concentrations, seems to reject a proposition that high CO2 solubility is favourable for expanding the reservoir zone where foam is generated. This indicates that the search for methods for effective CO2 mobility control should concentrate on surfactants that are mainly water soluble.