Jianli Wang , Xiao Xiao , Minghua Dong , Jingyuan Li
{"title":"ESG评级分歧是否阻碍了企业的绿色创新?来自中国的证据","authors":"Jianli Wang , Xiao Xiao , Minghua Dong , Jingyuan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid development of ESG investment has led to the swift emergence of ESG rating agencies, causing ESG rating disagreements that impact corporate green innovation. This paper utilizes panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies to explore the impact of ESG rating disagreement on corporate green innovation and its underlying mechanisms. Our findings reveal that ESG rating disagreement negatively affects corporate green innovation, which is supported by several endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanism analysis indicates that institutional investor shareholding and effective internal control mitigate these adverse effects. Further research shows that firms that are in central and western China, are not technology-intensive, have high market competition, and receive high investor attention are particularly susceptible to these negative impacts. Consequently, the government should encourage enterprises to actively implement ESG principles and accelerate the development of ESG rating standards and disclosure systems to foster high-quality corporate development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 103146"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does ESG rating disagreement discourage corporate green innovation? Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Jianli Wang , Xiao Xiao , Minghua Dong , Jingyuan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The rapid development of ESG investment has led to the swift emergence of ESG rating agencies, causing ESG rating disagreements that impact corporate green innovation. This paper utilizes panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies to explore the impact of ESG rating disagreement on corporate green innovation and its underlying mechanisms. Our findings reveal that ESG rating disagreement negatively affects corporate green innovation, which is supported by several endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanism analysis indicates that institutional investor shareholding and effective internal control mitigate these adverse effects. Further research shows that firms that are in central and western China, are not technology-intensive, have high market competition, and receive high investor attention are particularly susceptible to these negative impacts. Consequently, the government should encourage enterprises to actively implement ESG principles and accelerate the development of ESG rating standards and disclosure systems to foster high-quality corporate development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925004027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925004027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does ESG rating disagreement discourage corporate green innovation? Evidence from China
The rapid development of ESG investment has led to the swift emergence of ESG rating agencies, causing ESG rating disagreements that impact corporate green innovation. This paper utilizes panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies to explore the impact of ESG rating disagreement on corporate green innovation and its underlying mechanisms. Our findings reveal that ESG rating disagreement negatively affects corporate green innovation, which is supported by several endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanism analysis indicates that institutional investor shareholding and effective internal control mitigate these adverse effects. Further research shows that firms that are in central and western China, are not technology-intensive, have high market competition, and receive high investor attention are particularly susceptible to these negative impacts. Consequently, the government should encourage enterprises to actively implement ESG principles and accelerate the development of ESG rating standards and disclosure systems to foster high-quality corporate development.
期刊介绍:
Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance