ESG评级分歧是否阻碍了企业的绿色创新?来自中国的证据

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Jianli Wang , Xiao Xiao , Minghua Dong , Jingyuan Li
{"title":"ESG评级分歧是否阻碍了企业的绿色创新?来自中国的证据","authors":"Jianli Wang ,&nbsp;Xiao Xiao ,&nbsp;Minghua Dong ,&nbsp;Jingyuan Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rapid development of ESG investment has led to the swift emergence of ESG rating agencies, causing ESG rating disagreements that impact corporate green innovation. This paper utilizes panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies to explore the impact of ESG rating disagreement on corporate green innovation and its underlying mechanisms. Our findings reveal that ESG rating disagreement negatively affects corporate green innovation, which is supported by several endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanism analysis indicates that institutional investor shareholding and effective internal control mitigate these adverse effects. Further research shows that firms that are in central and western China, are not technology-intensive, have high market competition, and receive high investor attention are particularly susceptible to these negative impacts. Consequently, the government should encourage enterprises to actively implement ESG principles and accelerate the development of ESG rating standards and disclosure systems to foster high-quality corporate development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 103146"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does ESG rating disagreement discourage corporate green innovation? Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Jianli Wang ,&nbsp;Xiao Xiao ,&nbsp;Minghua Dong ,&nbsp;Jingyuan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The rapid development of ESG investment has led to the swift emergence of ESG rating agencies, causing ESG rating disagreements that impact corporate green innovation. This paper utilizes panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies to explore the impact of ESG rating disagreement on corporate green innovation and its underlying mechanisms. Our findings reveal that ESG rating disagreement negatively affects corporate green innovation, which is supported by several endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanism analysis indicates that institutional investor shareholding and effective internal control mitigate these adverse effects. Further research shows that firms that are in central and western China, are not technology-intensive, have high market competition, and receive high investor attention are particularly susceptible to these negative impacts. Consequently, the government should encourage enterprises to actively implement ESG principles and accelerate the development of ESG rating standards and disclosure systems to foster high-quality corporate development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"volume\":\"80 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925004027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925004027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ESG投资的快速发展导致ESG评级机构的迅速出现,导致ESG评级分歧,影响企业绿色创新。本文利用中国a股上市公司的面板数据,探讨ESG评级差异对企业绿色创新的影响及其潜在机制。研究结果表明,ESG评级差异对企业绿色创新具有负向影响,并得到了内生性检验和稳健性检验的支持。机制分析表明,机构投资者持股和有效的内部控制可以缓解这些不利影响。进一步的研究表明,位于中国中西部、技术密集型程度不高、市场竞争激烈、投资者关注度高的企业尤其容易受到这些负面影响。因此,政府应鼓励企业积极落实ESG原则,加快制定ESG评级标准和信息披露制度,促进企业高质量发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does ESG rating disagreement discourage corporate green innovation? Evidence from China
The rapid development of ESG investment has led to the swift emergence of ESG rating agencies, causing ESG rating disagreements that impact corporate green innovation. This paper utilizes panel data from Chinese A-share listed companies to explore the impact of ESG rating disagreement on corporate green innovation and its underlying mechanisms. Our findings reveal that ESG rating disagreement negatively affects corporate green innovation, which is supported by several endogeneity and robustness tests. Mechanism analysis indicates that institutional investor shareholding and effective internal control mitigate these adverse effects. Further research shows that firms that are in central and western China, are not technology-intensive, have high market competition, and receive high investor attention are particularly susceptible to these negative impacts. Consequently, the government should encourage enterprises to actively implement ESG principles and accelerate the development of ESG rating standards and disclosure systems to foster high-quality corporate development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
9.20%
发文量
240
期刊介绍: Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信