膝关节x线片早期检测骨关节炎的深度学习模型的对比分析:一项回顾性研究

Q2 Medicine
Ajay Sharma , Jujhar Singh , Appan Kumar , Vedant Bajaj , Shubham Gupta
{"title":"膝关节x线片早期检测骨关节炎的深度学习模型的对比分析:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Ajay Sharma ,&nbsp;Jujhar Singh ,&nbsp;Appan Kumar ,&nbsp;Vedant Bajaj ,&nbsp;Shubham Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent degenerative joint disease leading to pain and disability worldwide. Early detection is critical to initiating treatment strategies that can delay disease progression. While deep learning models have shown promise in automating Osteoarthritis detection from radiographs, comparative studies assessing their efficacy for early-stage detection remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of three deep learning architectures for early detection of knee osteoarthritis using radiographic imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study analysing 1200 knee radiographs (1000 training, 200 validation) collected from 2022 to 2024. Three deep learning models (custom CNN, ResNet-50, and VGG-16) were implemented and trained using PyTorch. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC metrics. Ground truth was established through independent assessment by three experienced orthopaedic surgeons using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ResNet-50 demonstrated superior performance with accuracy 0.912 ± 0.018, sensitivity 0.908 ± 0.021, specificity 0.916 ± 0.017, and AUC 0.934 ± 0.013. VGG-16 followed with accuracy 0.887 ± 0.020, while the custom CNN achieved 0.853 ± 0.025. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences between models (p &lt; 0.01). Inter-observer agreement (kappa = 0.83 ± 0.02) indicated strong concordance between AI predictions and expert assessments. Model performance remained consistent across demographic subgroups, with only minimal variations based on age and BMI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ResNet-50 architecture demonstrated optimal performance for early osteoarthritis detection, combining high accuracy with clinically viable processing speeds. The model's consistency across demographic subgroups and strong inter-observer agreement suggests potential for reliable clinical implementation in automated screening workflows.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 103212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of deep learning models for early detection of osteoarthritis using knee radiographs: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Ajay Sharma ,&nbsp;Jujhar Singh ,&nbsp;Appan Kumar ,&nbsp;Vedant Bajaj ,&nbsp;Shubham Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent degenerative joint disease leading to pain and disability worldwide. Early detection is critical to initiating treatment strategies that can delay disease progression. While deep learning models have shown promise in automating Osteoarthritis detection from radiographs, comparative studies assessing their efficacy for early-stage detection remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of three deep learning architectures for early detection of knee osteoarthritis using radiographic imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study analysing 1200 knee radiographs (1000 training, 200 validation) collected from 2022 to 2024. Three deep learning models (custom CNN, ResNet-50, and VGG-16) were implemented and trained using PyTorch. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC metrics. Ground truth was established through independent assessment by three experienced orthopaedic surgeons using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ResNet-50 demonstrated superior performance with accuracy 0.912 ± 0.018, sensitivity 0.908 ± 0.021, specificity 0.916 ± 0.017, and AUC 0.934 ± 0.013. VGG-16 followed with accuracy 0.887 ± 0.020, while the custom CNN achieved 0.853 ± 0.025. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences between models (p &lt; 0.01). Inter-observer agreement (kappa = 0.83 ± 0.02) indicated strong concordance between AI predictions and expert assessments. Model performance remained consistent across demographic subgroups, with only minimal variations based on age and BMI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ResNet-50 architecture demonstrated optimal performance for early osteoarthritis detection, combining high accuracy with clinically viable processing speeds. The model's consistency across demographic subgroups and strong inter-observer agreement suggests potential for reliable clinical implementation in automated screening workflows.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225003108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0976566225003108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

膝关节骨性关节炎是一种常见的退行性关节疾病,在世界范围内导致疼痛和残疾。早期发现对于启动可以延缓疾病进展的治疗策略至关重要。虽然深度学习模型在从x线片自动检测骨关节炎方面显示出了希望,但评估其早期检测效果的比较研究仍然有限。本研究的目的是评估和比较三种深度学习架构在使用放射成像早期检测膝关节骨关节炎方面的性能。材料与方法回顾性研究分析了2022年至2024年收集的1200张膝关节x线片(1000张训练片,200张验证片)。使用PyTorch实现和训练了三个深度学习模型(自定义CNN, ResNet-50和VGG-16)。使用准确性、敏感性、特异性和AUC-ROC指标评估疗效。三名经验丰富的骨科医生使用Kellgren-Lawrence评分系统进行独立评估。结果resnet -50的准确度为0.912±0.018,灵敏度为0.908±0.021,特异度为0.916±0.017,AUC为0.934±0.013。VGG-16精度为0.887±0.020,定制CNN精度为0.853±0.025。统计分析证实模型间存在显著差异(p < 0.01)。观察者间一致性(kappa = 0.83±0.02)表明人工智能预测与专家评估之间具有很强的一致性。模型的表现在人口统计亚组中保持一致,只有最小的年龄和BMI差异。结论resnet -50架构具有较高的准确率和临床可行的处理速度,可用于骨关节炎早期检测。该模型在人口统计亚组之间的一致性和强大的观察者之间的一致性表明,在自动化筛查工作流程中有可能实现可靠的临床实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of deep learning models for early detection of osteoarthritis using knee radiographs: A retrospective study

Background

Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent degenerative joint disease leading to pain and disability worldwide. Early detection is critical to initiating treatment strategies that can delay disease progression. While deep learning models have shown promise in automating Osteoarthritis detection from radiographs, comparative studies assessing their efficacy for early-stage detection remain limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the performance of three deep learning architectures for early detection of knee osteoarthritis using radiographic imaging.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study analysing 1200 knee radiographs (1000 training, 200 validation) collected from 2022 to 2024. Three deep learning models (custom CNN, ResNet-50, and VGG-16) were implemented and trained using PyTorch. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC metrics. Ground truth was established through independent assessment by three experienced orthopaedic surgeons using the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system.

Results

ResNet-50 demonstrated superior performance with accuracy 0.912 ± 0.018, sensitivity 0.908 ± 0.021, specificity 0.916 ± 0.017, and AUC 0.934 ± 0.013. VGG-16 followed with accuracy 0.887 ± 0.020, while the custom CNN achieved 0.853 ± 0.025. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences between models (p < 0.01). Inter-observer agreement (kappa = 0.83 ± 0.02) indicated strong concordance between AI predictions and expert assessments. Model performance remained consistent across demographic subgroups, with only minimal variations based on age and BMI.

Conclusion

ResNet-50 architecture demonstrated optimal performance for early osteoarthritis detection, combining high accuracy with clinically viable processing speeds. The model's consistency across demographic subgroups and strong inter-observer agreement suggests potential for reliable clinical implementation in automated screening workflows.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信