Alex Lence , Ahmad Fall , Samuel David Cohen , Federica Granese , Jean-Daniel Zucker , Joe-Elie Salem , Edi Prifti
{"title":"ECGtizer:一个开源的全自动流水线,用于数字化和从纸质心电图中恢复信号","authors":"Alex Lence , Ahmad Fall , Samuel David Cohen , Federica Granese , Jean-Daniel Zucker , Joe-Elie Salem , Edi Prifti","doi":"10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective:</h3><div>Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are essential for diagnosing cardiac pathologies, yet traditional paper-based ECG storage poses significant challenges for automated analyses. Despite the growing interest in leveraging AI for ECG analysis, there remains a lack of accessible, fully automated tools for digitizing paper-based ECGs. Existing solutions are often incomplete, behind paywalls, or not suited for large-scale use. To address this gap, we present <span>ECGtizer</span>: an open-source, fully automated tool that enables high-fidelity digitization of paper ECGs, ensuring long-term preservation of clinical data and unlocking their potential for modern AI-driven analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div><span>ECGtizer</span> employs automated lead detection, three different pixel-based signal extraction algorithms, and a deep learning-based signal reconstruction module. We evaluated <span>ECGtizer</span> on two datasets: a real-life cohort from the COVID-19 pandemic (JOCOVID) and a publicly available dataset (PTB-XL). Performance was compared with two existing methods: the fully automated <span>ECGminer</span> and the semi-automated <span>PaperECG</span>, which requires human intervention. The tools’ digitization performance was assessed in terms of signal recovery, the fidelity of clinically relevant feature measurement and downstream AI classification tasks on a third dataset (GENEREPOL).</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Results show that <span>ECGtizer</span> outperforms state-of-the-art methods, with its <span>ECGtizer</span> <span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mtext>Frag</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span> algorithm delivering superior signal recovery performance. While <span>PaperECG</span> demonstrated better outcomes than <span>ECGminer</span>, it also requires human input.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div><span>ECGtizer</span> enhances the usability of historical ECG data and supports advanced AI-based diagnostic methods, making it a valuable addition to the field of AI in ECG analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55362,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 108710"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ECGtizer: An open-source, fully automated pipeline for digitization and signal recovery from paper electrocardiograms\",\"authors\":\"Alex Lence , Ahmad Fall , Samuel David Cohen , Federica Granese , Jean-Daniel Zucker , Joe-Elie Salem , Edi Prifti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objective:</h3><div>Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are essential for diagnosing cardiac pathologies, yet traditional paper-based ECG storage poses significant challenges for automated analyses. Despite the growing interest in leveraging AI for ECG analysis, there remains a lack of accessible, fully automated tools for digitizing paper-based ECGs. Existing solutions are often incomplete, behind paywalls, or not suited for large-scale use. To address this gap, we present <span>ECGtizer</span>: an open-source, fully automated tool that enables high-fidelity digitization of paper ECGs, ensuring long-term preservation of clinical data and unlocking their potential for modern AI-driven analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div><span>ECGtizer</span> employs automated lead detection, three different pixel-based signal extraction algorithms, and a deep learning-based signal reconstruction module. We evaluated <span>ECGtizer</span> on two datasets: a real-life cohort from the COVID-19 pandemic (JOCOVID) and a publicly available dataset (PTB-XL). Performance was compared with two existing methods: the fully automated <span>ECGminer</span> and the semi-automated <span>PaperECG</span>, which requires human intervention. The tools’ digitization performance was assessed in terms of signal recovery, the fidelity of clinically relevant feature measurement and downstream AI classification tasks on a third dataset (GENEREPOL).</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Results show that <span>ECGtizer</span> outperforms state-of-the-art methods, with its <span>ECGtizer</span> <span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mtext>Frag</mtext></mrow></msub></math></span> algorithm delivering superior signal recovery performance. While <span>PaperECG</span> demonstrated better outcomes than <span>ECGminer</span>, it also requires human input.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><div><span>ECGtizer</span> enhances the usability of historical ECG data and supports advanced AI-based diagnostic methods, making it a valuable addition to the field of AI in ECG analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809425012212\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809425012212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
ECGtizer: An open-source, fully automated pipeline for digitization and signal recovery from paper electrocardiograms
Background and Objective:
Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are essential for diagnosing cardiac pathologies, yet traditional paper-based ECG storage poses significant challenges for automated analyses. Despite the growing interest in leveraging AI for ECG analysis, there remains a lack of accessible, fully automated tools for digitizing paper-based ECGs. Existing solutions are often incomplete, behind paywalls, or not suited for large-scale use. To address this gap, we present ECGtizer: an open-source, fully automated tool that enables high-fidelity digitization of paper ECGs, ensuring long-term preservation of clinical data and unlocking their potential for modern AI-driven analysis.
Methods:
ECGtizer employs automated lead detection, three different pixel-based signal extraction algorithms, and a deep learning-based signal reconstruction module. We evaluated ECGtizer on two datasets: a real-life cohort from the COVID-19 pandemic (JOCOVID) and a publicly available dataset (PTB-XL). Performance was compared with two existing methods: the fully automated ECGminer and the semi-automated PaperECG, which requires human intervention. The tools’ digitization performance was assessed in terms of signal recovery, the fidelity of clinically relevant feature measurement and downstream AI classification tasks on a third dataset (GENEREPOL).
Results:
Results show that ECGtizer outperforms state-of-the-art methods, with its ECGtizer algorithm delivering superior signal recovery performance. While PaperECG demonstrated better outcomes than ECGminer, it also requires human input.
Conclusions:
ECGtizer enhances the usability of historical ECG data and supports advanced AI-based diagnostic methods, making it a valuable addition to the field of AI in ECG analysis.
期刊介绍:
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control aims to provide a cross-disciplinary international forum for the interchange of information on research in the measurement and analysis of signals and images in clinical medicine and the biological sciences. Emphasis is placed on contributions dealing with the practical, applications-led research on the use of methods and devices in clinical diagnosis, patient monitoring and management.
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control reflects the main areas in which these methods are being used and developed at the interface of both engineering and clinical science. The scope of the journal is defined to include relevant review papers, technical notes, short communications and letters. Tutorial papers and special issues will also be published.