双重税收优惠是否有利于企业的绿色创新?

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Xiaofeng Wang , Minqiang Zhang , Xiaomei Guo , Yihuo Jiang
{"title":"双重税收优惠是否有利于企业的绿色创新?","authors":"Xiaofeng Wang ,&nbsp;Minqiang Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaomei Guo ,&nbsp;Yihuo Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.108485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Carbon emission reduction constitutes a vital directive for global socioeconomic development in both contemporary and future contexts, with advancing green innovation among high-energy-consumption industrial enterprises representing an essential mechanism for achieving decarbonization. This study empirically investigates the incentive effects of the super-deduction of R&amp;D expenses policy and the income tax rate preferential policy on green innovation within Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed high-energy-consumption enterprises, utilizing panel data spanning 2016 to 2022. The analysis specifically examines interaction effects between these policies to assess their combinatorial consistency. Research demonstrates both tax incentive policies significantly stimulate green innovation; however, their concurrent application proves counterproductive, significantly hindering green innovation advancement. Environmental regulations and executive environmental awareness effectively mitigate this adverse interactive effect. Further research reveals that the negative interactive effects of the two policies persist within corporate ESG performance and subsequently influence corporate carbon emissions. By extending tax incentive policy coherence research to the green innovation domain, this investigation provides substantive decision-making references for governments promoting sustainable transformation in energy-intensive industries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 108485"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does dual tax incentives benefit green innovation for enterprises?\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofeng Wang ,&nbsp;Minqiang Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaomei Guo ,&nbsp;Yihuo Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.108485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Carbon emission reduction constitutes a vital directive for global socioeconomic development in both contemporary and future contexts, with advancing green innovation among high-energy-consumption industrial enterprises representing an essential mechanism for achieving decarbonization. This study empirically investigates the incentive effects of the super-deduction of R&amp;D expenses policy and the income tax rate preferential policy on green innovation within Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed high-energy-consumption enterprises, utilizing panel data spanning 2016 to 2022. The analysis specifically examines interaction effects between these policies to assess their combinatorial consistency. Research demonstrates both tax incentive policies significantly stimulate green innovation; however, their concurrent application proves counterproductive, significantly hindering green innovation advancement. Environmental regulations and executive environmental awareness effectively mitigate this adverse interactive effect. Further research reveals that the negative interactive effects of the two policies persist within corporate ESG performance and subsequently influence corporate carbon emissions. By extending tax incentive policy coherence research to the green innovation domain, this investigation provides substantive decision-making references for governments promoting sustainable transformation in energy-intensive industries.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325017398\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612325017398","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳减排是当前和未来全球社会经济发展的重要方向,推进高能耗工业企业绿色创新是实现脱碳的重要机制。本文利用2016 - 2022年面板数据,实证研究了沪深两市a股上市高耗能企业研发费用超抵扣政策和所得税率优惠政策对绿色创新的激励效应。该分析特别检查了这些政策之间的相互作用,以评估其组合一致性。研究表明,税收优惠政策对绿色创新具有显著的刺激作用;然而,它们的同时应用证明是适得其反的,严重阻碍了绿色创新的推进。环境法规和行政环保意识有效地减轻了这种不利的相互影响。进一步的研究表明,这两项政策的负面互动效应在企业ESG绩效中持续存在,并随后影响企业的碳排放。通过将税收激励政策一致性研究扩展到绿色创新领域,本研究为政府推动高耗能产业可持续转型提供了实质性的决策参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does dual tax incentives benefit green innovation for enterprises?
Carbon emission reduction constitutes a vital directive for global socioeconomic development in both contemporary and future contexts, with advancing green innovation among high-energy-consumption industrial enterprises representing an essential mechanism for achieving decarbonization. This study empirically investigates the incentive effects of the super-deduction of R&D expenses policy and the income tax rate preferential policy on green innovation within Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed high-energy-consumption enterprises, utilizing panel data spanning 2016 to 2022. The analysis specifically examines interaction effects between these policies to assess their combinatorial consistency. Research demonstrates both tax incentive policies significantly stimulate green innovation; however, their concurrent application proves counterproductive, significantly hindering green innovation advancement. Environmental regulations and executive environmental awareness effectively mitigate this adverse interactive effect. Further research reveals that the negative interactive effects of the two policies persist within corporate ESG performance and subsequently influence corporate carbon emissions. By extending tax incentive policy coherence research to the green innovation domain, this investigation provides substantive decision-making references for governments promoting sustainable transformation in energy-intensive industries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finance Research Letters
Finance Research Letters BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
14.40%
发文量
863
期刊介绍: Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies. Papers are invited in the following areas: Actuarial studies Alternative investments Asset Pricing Bankruptcy and liquidation Banks and other Depository Institutions Behavioral and experimental finance Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance Capital budgeting and corporate investment Capital markets and accounting Capital structure and payout policy Commodities Contagion, crises and interdependence Corporate governance Credit and fixed income markets and instruments Derivatives Emerging markets Energy Finance and Energy Markets Financial Econometrics Financial History Financial intermediation and money markets Financial markets and marketplaces Financial Mathematics and Econophysics Financial Regulation and Law Forecasting Frontier market studies International Finance Market efficiency, event studies Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control Micro Finance Institutions Microstructure Non-bank Financial Institutions Personal Finance Portfolio choice and investing Real estate finance and investing Risk SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信