自行车和汽车之间或超越?在向可持续城市交通过渡的过程中导航电子货运自行车公民

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Clara Glachant , Noel Cass , Nicholas Marks , Labib Azzouz
{"title":"自行车和汽车之间或超越?在向可持续城市交通过渡的过程中导航电子货运自行车公民","authors":"Clara Glachant ,&nbsp;Noel Cass ,&nbsp;Nicholas Marks ,&nbsp;Labib Azzouz","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>E-cargo bikes have gained academic and policy interest for their potential to replace car trips in cities. Like bicycles, they require pedaling, produce few emissions, and use cycling infrastructure, while offering capacity for transporting passengers and goods, like cars. Yet, additionally to mode and infrastructure changes, shifts in identities, culture and citizenships, are needed to challenge the dominance of automobility. This article introduces the concept of ‘e-cargo bike citizenship’ as a cultural identity shaped through e-cargo cycling practices to understand how they challenge both automobility and vélomobility in transitions to sustainable urban mobility. We analysed 108 interviews with 49 e-cargo bike users in Brighton, Leeds, and Oxford, conducted during a trial loan project. Results indicate that e-cargo bike citizenship broadens cycling identities in contexts where cycling has negative cultural associations. Additionally, e-cargo bike citizenship is often family citizenship, contrasting with individualised cycling, and contesting the norm of motorised family mobility. E-cargo cycling also enables interactions ‘inside’ between rider and passenger(s), reminiscent of automobile citizenship − although typically with less comfort and varying depending on the type of cargo bike, while being connected ‘outside’ to local communities, reinforcing a sense of belonging that echoes cycling citizenship. Our findings contribute to geography and mobilities research by considering e-cargo bikes’ hybridity, beyond cars and bicycles, and highlight the significance of citizenships in urban mobility transitions, focusing on domestic e-cargo bikes, contrasting with previous studies’ last-mile logistics focus.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104416"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between or Beyond Bicycles and Cars? Navigating E-Cargo Bike Citizenship in the Transition to Sustainable Urban Mobility\",\"authors\":\"Clara Glachant ,&nbsp;Noel Cass ,&nbsp;Nicholas Marks ,&nbsp;Labib Azzouz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104416\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>E-cargo bikes have gained academic and policy interest for their potential to replace car trips in cities. Like bicycles, they require pedaling, produce few emissions, and use cycling infrastructure, while offering capacity for transporting passengers and goods, like cars. Yet, additionally to mode and infrastructure changes, shifts in identities, culture and citizenships, are needed to challenge the dominance of automobility. This article introduces the concept of ‘e-cargo bike citizenship’ as a cultural identity shaped through e-cargo cycling practices to understand how they challenge both automobility and vélomobility in transitions to sustainable urban mobility. We analysed 108 interviews with 49 e-cargo bike users in Brighton, Leeds, and Oxford, conducted during a trial loan project. Results indicate that e-cargo bike citizenship broadens cycling identities in contexts where cycling has negative cultural associations. Additionally, e-cargo bike citizenship is often family citizenship, contrasting with individualised cycling, and contesting the norm of motorised family mobility. E-cargo cycling also enables interactions ‘inside’ between rider and passenger(s), reminiscent of automobile citizenship − although typically with less comfort and varying depending on the type of cargo bike, while being connected ‘outside’ to local communities, reinforcing a sense of belonging that echoes cycling citizenship. Our findings contribute to geography and mobilities research by considering e-cargo bikes’ hybridity, beyond cars and bicycles, and highlight the significance of citizenships in urban mobility transitions, focusing on domestic e-cargo bikes, contrasting with previous studies’ last-mile logistics focus.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"166 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104416\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525002167\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525002167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电动货运自行车因其在城市中取代汽车出行的潜力而引起了学术界和政界的兴趣。像自行车一样,它们需要踩踏板,产生很少的排放,并且使用自行车基础设施,同时提供像汽车一样运送乘客和货物的能力。然而,除了模式和基础设施的变化,身份、文化和公民身份的转变也需要挑战汽车的主导地位。本文介绍了“电动载货自行车公民”的概念,作为一种通过电动载货自行车实践形成的文化认同,以了解它们如何在向可持续城市交通过渡的过程中挑战汽车机动性和电动交通机动性。我们分析了在试行贷款项目期间对布莱顿、利兹和牛津的49名电动载货自行车用户进行的108次访谈。结果表明,在自行车具有负面文化关联的背景下,电子货运自行车公民身份拓宽了自行车身份。此外,电子货运自行车公民身份往往是家庭公民身份,与个性化自行车形成鲜明对比,并与机动家庭出行的规范相抗衡。电子货运自行车还能让骑行者和乘客之间的“内部”互动,让人想起汽车公民——尽管通常不那么舒适,而且根据货运自行车的类型而有所不同,同时与“外部”的当地社区联系在一起,加强了一种归属感,这与自行车公民相呼应。我们的研究结果通过考虑电动货运自行车在汽车和自行车之外的混合性,为地理和交通研究做出了贡献,并强调了公民身份在城市交通转型中的重要性,重点关注国内电动货运自行车,与以往研究的最后一英里物流重点形成对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between or Beyond Bicycles and Cars? Navigating E-Cargo Bike Citizenship in the Transition to Sustainable Urban Mobility
E-cargo bikes have gained academic and policy interest for their potential to replace car trips in cities. Like bicycles, they require pedaling, produce few emissions, and use cycling infrastructure, while offering capacity for transporting passengers and goods, like cars. Yet, additionally to mode and infrastructure changes, shifts in identities, culture and citizenships, are needed to challenge the dominance of automobility. This article introduces the concept of ‘e-cargo bike citizenship’ as a cultural identity shaped through e-cargo cycling practices to understand how they challenge both automobility and vélomobility in transitions to sustainable urban mobility. We analysed 108 interviews with 49 e-cargo bike users in Brighton, Leeds, and Oxford, conducted during a trial loan project. Results indicate that e-cargo bike citizenship broadens cycling identities in contexts where cycling has negative cultural associations. Additionally, e-cargo bike citizenship is often family citizenship, contrasting with individualised cycling, and contesting the norm of motorised family mobility. E-cargo cycling also enables interactions ‘inside’ between rider and passenger(s), reminiscent of automobile citizenship − although typically with less comfort and varying depending on the type of cargo bike, while being connected ‘outside’ to local communities, reinforcing a sense of belonging that echoes cycling citizenship. Our findings contribute to geography and mobilities research by considering e-cargo bikes’ hybridity, beyond cars and bicycles, and highlight the significance of citizenships in urban mobility transitions, focusing on domestic e-cargo bikes, contrasting with previous studies’ last-mile logistics focus.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信