动物围场利用研究方向的系统综述

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
James Edward Brereton , Jenna Davison , Alex Vine , Shelby Renee Brereton , Eduardo J. Fernandez
{"title":"动物围场利用研究方向的系统综述","authors":"James Edward Brereton ,&nbsp;Jenna Davison ,&nbsp;Alex Vine ,&nbsp;Shelby Renee Brereton ,&nbsp;Eduardo J. Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enclosure use research is important for better understanding the needs and preferences of animals under captive care. As such, enclosure use is often assessed in tandem with behavioural observations as part of holistic welfare assessments. Although valuable as a welfare tool, there are several inherent challenges in enclosure use research, including variability in zones, resource sizes and observation lengths, with several indices developed to account for these challenges. Nonetheless, it is unclear the extent to which these enclosure use indices are commonly used in published literature. Therefore, it is important that the role of these indices in welfare research be quantified and reviewed, with a view to understanding the needs of enclosure use researchers. In addition, although one enclosure use review has been previously published, the work was not systematic in its approach, and there is a need for updated research given the changes in technology since its publication. To identify the current index, topics and species focuses, we conducted a systematic review of enclosure use literature, using several search engines. A total of 4275 papers were identified: following filtering 169 papers remained, which investigated 260 species-level studies. The review identified relatively few published publications before the turn of the millennium, with most papers published since 2004. In addition, 2023 had the most enclosure use-based publications, with a total of 21 papers found. The most common topics under study were visitor effects and enrichment, which demonstrates that much of the enclosure use literature is motivated by welfare-related questions. Most papers used no stated formal enclosure use index, which may pose challenges in terms of research design and interpretation. There was limited crossover in terms of index use between different industries, such as laboratories, agriculture and zoos. Additionally, over half of the identified studies focused on a mammalian species, whereas fish and invertebrate studies were identified infrequently. This systematic review demonstrates that there is need to share knowledge and enclosure use methodologies between industries, and focusing on a greater diversity of taxa would aid in improving overall species welfare and husbandry knowledge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of directions in animal enclosure use studies\",\"authors\":\"James Edward Brereton ,&nbsp;Jenna Davison ,&nbsp;Alex Vine ,&nbsp;Shelby Renee Brereton ,&nbsp;Eduardo J. Fernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Enclosure use research is important for better understanding the needs and preferences of animals under captive care. As such, enclosure use is often assessed in tandem with behavioural observations as part of holistic welfare assessments. Although valuable as a welfare tool, there are several inherent challenges in enclosure use research, including variability in zones, resource sizes and observation lengths, with several indices developed to account for these challenges. Nonetheless, it is unclear the extent to which these enclosure use indices are commonly used in published literature. Therefore, it is important that the role of these indices in welfare research be quantified and reviewed, with a view to understanding the needs of enclosure use researchers. In addition, although one enclosure use review has been previously published, the work was not systematic in its approach, and there is a need for updated research given the changes in technology since its publication. To identify the current index, topics and species focuses, we conducted a systematic review of enclosure use literature, using several search engines. A total of 4275 papers were identified: following filtering 169 papers remained, which investigated 260 species-level studies. The review identified relatively few published publications before the turn of the millennium, with most papers published since 2004. In addition, 2023 had the most enclosure use-based publications, with a total of 21 papers found. The most common topics under study were visitor effects and enrichment, which demonstrates that much of the enclosure use literature is motivated by welfare-related questions. Most papers used no stated formal enclosure use index, which may pose challenges in terms of research design and interpretation. There was limited crossover in terms of index use between different industries, such as laboratories, agriculture and zoos. Additionally, over half of the identified studies focused on a mammalian species, whereas fish and invertebrate studies were identified infrequently. This systematic review demonstrates that there is need to share knowledge and enclosure use methodologies between industries, and focusing on a greater diversity of taxa would aid in improving overall species welfare and husbandry knowledge.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"292 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125003235\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125003235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

圈养利用研究对于更好地了解圈养动物的需求和偏好非常重要。因此,圈地使用通常与行为观察同时进行评估,作为整体福利评估的一部分。虽然作为一种福利工具很有价值,但圈地利用研究存在一些固有的挑战,包括区域的变化、资源的大小和观察的长度,需要开发几个指数来解释这些挑战。尽管如此,目前尚不清楚这些圈地使用指数在已发表文献中普遍使用的程度。因此,有必要对这些指标在福利研究中的作用进行量化和评估,以了解圈地利用研究人员的需求。此外,虽然以前曾发表过一篇圈地使用综述,但其方法并不系统,鉴于其发表以来技术的变化,有必要进行最新的研究。为了确定当前的索引、主题和物种焦点,我们使用几个搜索引擎对圈地利用文献进行了系统的回顾。共筛选到4275篇论文,筛选出169篇,涉及260个物种水平的研究。该综述发现,在世纪之交之前发表的论文相对较少,大多数论文发表于2004年以后。此外,2023年的论文数量最多,共发现21篇论文。研究中最常见的主题是游客效应和丰富,这表明许多圈地使用文献是由福利相关问题驱动的。大多数论文没有使用正式的圈地使用索引,这可能会给研究设计和解释带来挑战。不同行业(如实验室、农业和动物园)之间的指数使用交叉有限。此外,超过一半的已确定的研究集中在哺乳动物物种上,而鱼类和无脊椎动物的研究很少被确定。系统回顾表明,需要在不同行业之间共享知识和圈地利用方法,关注更多的类群多样性将有助于提高整体物种福利和畜牧业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review of directions in animal enclosure use studies
Enclosure use research is important for better understanding the needs and preferences of animals under captive care. As such, enclosure use is often assessed in tandem with behavioural observations as part of holistic welfare assessments. Although valuable as a welfare tool, there are several inherent challenges in enclosure use research, including variability in zones, resource sizes and observation lengths, with several indices developed to account for these challenges. Nonetheless, it is unclear the extent to which these enclosure use indices are commonly used in published literature. Therefore, it is important that the role of these indices in welfare research be quantified and reviewed, with a view to understanding the needs of enclosure use researchers. In addition, although one enclosure use review has been previously published, the work was not systematic in its approach, and there is a need for updated research given the changes in technology since its publication. To identify the current index, topics and species focuses, we conducted a systematic review of enclosure use literature, using several search engines. A total of 4275 papers were identified: following filtering 169 papers remained, which investigated 260 species-level studies. The review identified relatively few published publications before the turn of the millennium, with most papers published since 2004. In addition, 2023 had the most enclosure use-based publications, with a total of 21 papers found. The most common topics under study were visitor effects and enrichment, which demonstrates that much of the enclosure use literature is motivated by welfare-related questions. Most papers used no stated formal enclosure use index, which may pose challenges in terms of research design and interpretation. There was limited crossover in terms of index use between different industries, such as laboratories, agriculture and zoos. Additionally, over half of the identified studies focused on a mammalian species, whereas fish and invertebrate studies were identified infrequently. This systematic review demonstrates that there is need to share knowledge and enclosure use methodologies between industries, and focusing on a greater diversity of taxa would aid in improving overall species welfare and husbandry knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信