排放模糊下数据驱动的全球化分布式鲁棒多周期垃圾焚烧能源供应链定位-路由-调度模型

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Xuekun Wang , Zhaozhuang Guo , Ying Liu
{"title":"排放模糊下数据驱动的全球化分布式鲁棒多周期垃圾焚烧能源供应链定位-路由-调度模型","authors":"Xuekun Wang ,&nbsp;Zhaozhuang Guo ,&nbsp;Ying Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The intensification of global energy shortages and continuous expansion of municipal solid waste require effectively optimizing the waste-to-energy supply chain (WtESC). When the distribution information of uncertain parameters is partially known, WtESC often faces complex and ambiguous challenges. To address this, we construct data-driven inner and outer ambiguity sets based on real data and utilize globalized distributionally robust (GDR) optimization framework to handle uncertainty. Compared with classical distributionally robust optimization, it allows for controllable violations of constraints in the outer ambiguity set. A data-driven globalized distributionally robust WtESC (GDR-WtESC) model is developed, and transformed into an equivalent mixed integer linear programming model according to duality theory. The computational results of real case indicate that <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>i</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> There is a conflict between economic and environmental objectives, and decision-makers can prioritize them based on their own preferences. <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> The tolerance level for constraint violation has a positive impact on the total cost. Specifically, the increase of tolerance level from 0.1 to 0.9 can reduce the optimal cost by 1.07%. <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> The optimal decision of GDR-WtESC model has strong stability and high quality. Compared with the sample average approximation (SAA) model, the variance of the objective value in out of sample experiments decreases by 88.28% on average, and the average cost decreases by 0.55%. The SAA method can address the uncertainty, but cannot handle constraint violations in realistic. Thus, for decision makers who are sensitive to distributional ambiguity, the GDR method is recommended for WtESC problem, because it enhances the robustness and reduces conservatism.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":286,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 109397"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-driven globalized distributionally robust multi-period location-routing-scheduling model for waste-to-energy supply chain under emissions ambiguity\",\"authors\":\"Xuekun Wang ,&nbsp;Zhaozhuang Guo ,&nbsp;Ying Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compchemeng.2025.109397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The intensification of global energy shortages and continuous expansion of municipal solid waste require effectively optimizing the waste-to-energy supply chain (WtESC). When the distribution information of uncertain parameters is partially known, WtESC often faces complex and ambiguous challenges. To address this, we construct data-driven inner and outer ambiguity sets based on real data and utilize globalized distributionally robust (GDR) optimization framework to handle uncertainty. Compared with classical distributionally robust optimization, it allows for controllable violations of constraints in the outer ambiguity set. A data-driven globalized distributionally robust WtESC (GDR-WtESC) model is developed, and transformed into an equivalent mixed integer linear programming model according to duality theory. The computational results of real case indicate that <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>i</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> There is a conflict between economic and environmental objectives, and decision-makers can prioritize them based on their own preferences. <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> The tolerance level for constraint violation has a positive impact on the total cost. Specifically, the increase of tolerance level from 0.1 to 0.9 can reduce the optimal cost by 1.07%. <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi><mi>i</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> The optimal decision of GDR-WtESC model has strong stability and high quality. Compared with the sample average approximation (SAA) model, the variance of the objective value in out of sample experiments decreases by 88.28% on average, and the average cost decreases by 0.55%. The SAA method can address the uncertainty, but cannot handle constraint violations in realistic. Thus, for decision makers who are sensitive to distributional ambiguity, the GDR method is recommended for WtESC problem, because it enhances the robustness and reduces conservatism.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135425004004\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098135425004004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球能源短缺的加剧和城市固体废物的不断扩大要求有效优化废物转化为能源的供应链。当不确定参数的分布信息部分已知时,WtESC往往面临复杂而模糊的挑战。为了解决这个问题,我们基于真实数据构建了数据驱动的内外模糊集,并利用全球化分布鲁棒性(GDR)优化框架来处理不确定性。与传统的分布鲁棒优化方法相比,该方法允许外部模糊集的约束违反是可控的。建立了数据驱动的全球化分布鲁棒WtESC模型,并根据对偶理论将其转化为等效混合整数线性规划模型。实际案例的计算结果表明:(1)经济目标和环境目标之间存在冲突,决策者可以根据自己的偏好优先考虑经济目标和环境目标。(ii)违反约束的容忍度对总成本有积极影响。其中,公差等级由0.1提高到0.9可使最优成本降低1.07%。(3) GDR-WtESC模型的最优决策稳定性强,质量高。与样本平均近似(SAA)模型相比,样本外实验的目标值方差平均降低了88.28%,平均成本降低了0.55%。SAA方法可以处理不确定性,但不能处理现实中的约束违反。因此,对于对分布模糊性敏感的决策者,建议使用GDR方法来解决WtESC问题,因为它增强了鲁棒性,降低了保守性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data-driven globalized distributionally robust multi-period location-routing-scheduling model for waste-to-energy supply chain under emissions ambiguity
The intensification of global energy shortages and continuous expansion of municipal solid waste require effectively optimizing the waste-to-energy supply chain (WtESC). When the distribution information of uncertain parameters is partially known, WtESC often faces complex and ambiguous challenges. To address this, we construct data-driven inner and outer ambiguity sets based on real data and utilize globalized distributionally robust (GDR) optimization framework to handle uncertainty. Compared with classical distributionally robust optimization, it allows for controllable violations of constraints in the outer ambiguity set. A data-driven globalized distributionally robust WtESC (GDR-WtESC) model is developed, and transformed into an equivalent mixed integer linear programming model according to duality theory. The computational results of real case indicate that (i) There is a conflict between economic and environmental objectives, and decision-makers can prioritize them based on their own preferences. (ii) The tolerance level for constraint violation has a positive impact on the total cost. Specifically, the increase of tolerance level from 0.1 to 0.9 can reduce the optimal cost by 1.07%. (iii) The optimal decision of GDR-WtESC model has strong stability and high quality. Compared with the sample average approximation (SAA) model, the variance of the objective value in out of sample experiments decreases by 88.28% on average, and the average cost decreases by 0.55%. The SAA method can address the uncertainty, but cannot handle constraint violations in realistic. Thus, for decision makers who are sensitive to distributional ambiguity, the GDR method is recommended for WtESC problem, because it enhances the robustness and reduces conservatism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Chemical Engineering
Computers & Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
14.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Chemical Engineering is primarily a journal of record for new developments in the application of computing and systems technology to chemical engineering problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信