拉丁美洲监测登记显示,与欧洲基准相比,来自肝硬化患者的侵袭性分离株的抗菌素耐药性更高

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gonzalo Gomez Perdiguero , Maria Dolores Murga , Ana Palazzo , Esteban Gonzalez Ballerga , Ilse Pardo Ivirico , Maria Daniela Perez , Lorena Notari , Josefina Pages , Manuel Mendizabal , Camila Maria Briz , Agustin Di Santo , Julia Brutti , Brenda Osso Sanchez , Margarita Anders , Pablo Calzetta , Alina Raquel Zerega , Angelo Z. Mattos , Astrid Smud , Laura R. Maboni , Maximiliano Castro , Sebastian Marciano
{"title":"拉丁美洲监测登记显示,与欧洲基准相比,来自肝硬化患者的侵袭性分离株的抗菌素耐药性更高","authors":"Gonzalo Gomez Perdiguero ,&nbsp;Maria Dolores Murga ,&nbsp;Ana Palazzo ,&nbsp;Esteban Gonzalez Ballerga ,&nbsp;Ilse Pardo Ivirico ,&nbsp;Maria Daniela Perez ,&nbsp;Lorena Notari ,&nbsp;Josefina Pages ,&nbsp;Manuel Mendizabal ,&nbsp;Camila Maria Briz ,&nbsp;Agustin Di Santo ,&nbsp;Julia Brutti ,&nbsp;Brenda Osso Sanchez ,&nbsp;Margarita Anders ,&nbsp;Pablo Calzetta ,&nbsp;Alina Raquel Zerega ,&nbsp;Angelo Z. Mattos ,&nbsp;Astrid Smud ,&nbsp;Laura R. Maboni ,&nbsp;Maximiliano Castro ,&nbsp;Sebastian Marciano","doi":"10.1016/j.aohep.2025.101959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><div>Given the growing burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), we aimed to report the prevalence of key AMR patterns in Latin American patients with cirrhosis and compare them with the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) data</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional study of invasive isolates (blood, ascitic or pleural fluid) from adults with cirrhosis enrolled in the Latin American surveillance registry (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0634940). AMR patterns were reported for key pathogens: E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, Acinetobacter spp., E. faecium, and P. aeruginosa.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between December 2020 and May 2025, 908 bacterial isolates were collected from Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, and Peru. Of these, 226 (25%) were obtained from invasive sites and correspond to predefined bacteria of epidemiological interest included in the analysis. Isolates were 39% nosocomial, 38% community-acquired, and 23% healthcare-associated. The main infections were spontaneous bacteremia (38%) and SBP (32%). Quinolone resistance was higher in Latin American vs. Europe for K. pneumoniae (56% vs. 34%) and E. coli (46% vs. 24%). Carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae was 46% (vs. 13%), and in E. coli, 5.3% (vs. 0.3%). Methicillin resistance among S. aureus was higher in Latin American (32%) than in Europe (16%). Other pathogens also showed higher resistance (Table).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The elevated resistance rates observed in Latin American patients with cirrhosis demand attention. In a region where regulatory gaps at multiple levels may contribute to antibiotic misuse, these findings call for urgent action to strengthen rational antibiotic use and implement effective stewardship strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7979,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepatology","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 101959"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LATIN AMERICAN SURVEILLANCE REGISTRY REVEALS HIGHER ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN INVASIVE ISOLATES FROM PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS COMPARED TO EUROPEAN BENCHMARKS\",\"authors\":\"Gonzalo Gomez Perdiguero ,&nbsp;Maria Dolores Murga ,&nbsp;Ana Palazzo ,&nbsp;Esteban Gonzalez Ballerga ,&nbsp;Ilse Pardo Ivirico ,&nbsp;Maria Daniela Perez ,&nbsp;Lorena Notari ,&nbsp;Josefina Pages ,&nbsp;Manuel Mendizabal ,&nbsp;Camila Maria Briz ,&nbsp;Agustin Di Santo ,&nbsp;Julia Brutti ,&nbsp;Brenda Osso Sanchez ,&nbsp;Margarita Anders ,&nbsp;Pablo Calzetta ,&nbsp;Alina Raquel Zerega ,&nbsp;Angelo Z. Mattos ,&nbsp;Astrid Smud ,&nbsp;Laura R. Maboni ,&nbsp;Maximiliano Castro ,&nbsp;Sebastian Marciano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aohep.2025.101959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and Objectives</h3><div>Given the growing burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), we aimed to report the prevalence of key AMR patterns in Latin American patients with cirrhosis and compare them with the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) data</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional study of invasive isolates (blood, ascitic or pleural fluid) from adults with cirrhosis enrolled in the Latin American surveillance registry (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0634940). AMR patterns were reported for key pathogens: E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, Acinetobacter spp., E. faecium, and P. aeruginosa.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Between December 2020 and May 2025, 908 bacterial isolates were collected from Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, and Peru. Of these, 226 (25%) were obtained from invasive sites and correspond to predefined bacteria of epidemiological interest included in the analysis. Isolates were 39% nosocomial, 38% community-acquired, and 23% healthcare-associated. The main infections were spontaneous bacteremia (38%) and SBP (32%). Quinolone resistance was higher in Latin American vs. Europe for K. pneumoniae (56% vs. 34%) and E. coli (46% vs. 24%). Carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae was 46% (vs. 13%), and in E. coli, 5.3% (vs. 0.3%). Methicillin resistance among S. aureus was higher in Latin American (32%) than in Europe (16%). Other pathogens also showed higher resistance (Table).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The elevated resistance rates observed in Latin American patients with cirrhosis demand attention. In a region where regulatory gaps at multiple levels may contribute to antibiotic misuse, these findings call for urgent action to strengthen rational antibiotic use and implement effective stewardship strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of hepatology\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101959\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S166526812500184X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S166526812500184X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的负担日益加重,我们旨在报告拉丁美洲肝硬化患者中主要AMR模式的流行情况,并将其与欧洲抗菌素耐药性监测网络(ear - net)数据进行比较。材料和方法对拉丁美洲监测登记处(ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0634940)登记的成年肝硬化患者的侵袭性分离物(血液、腹水或胸膜液)进行横断面研究。报告了主要病原体的抗菌素耐药性模式:大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、不动杆菌、粪肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌。结果2020年12月至2025年5月,在阿根廷、乌拉圭、巴西和秘鲁共分离到908株细菌。其中226个(25%)来自入侵点,与分析中预先确定的流行病学兴趣细菌相对应。分离株39%是医院感染,38%是社区获得,23%是卫生保健相关。主要感染为自发性菌血症(38%)和收缩压(32%)。拉丁美洲的肺炎克雷伯菌(56%对34%)和大肠杆菌(46%对24%)对喹诺酮类药物的耐药性高于欧洲。肺炎克雷伯菌对碳青霉烯的耐药性为46% (vs. 13%),大肠杆菌为5.3% (vs. 0.3%)。金黄色葡萄球菌对甲氧西林的耐药性在拉丁美洲(32%)高于欧洲(16%)。其他病原体也表现出更高的耐药性(表)。结论拉丁美洲肝硬化患者耐药率升高值得关注。在一个多个层面的监管缺口可能导致抗生素滥用的地区,这些发现呼吁采取紧急行动,加强抗生素的合理使用并实施有效的管理战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LATIN AMERICAN SURVEILLANCE REGISTRY REVEALS HIGHER ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE IN INVASIVE ISOLATES FROM PATIENTS WITH CIRRHOSIS COMPARED TO EUROPEAN BENCHMARKS

Introduction and Objectives

Given the growing burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), we aimed to report the prevalence of key AMR patterns in Latin American patients with cirrhosis and compare them with the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) data

Materials and Methods

Cross-sectional study of invasive isolates (blood, ascitic or pleural fluid) from adults with cirrhosis enrolled in the Latin American surveillance registry (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0634940). AMR patterns were reported for key pathogens: E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, Acinetobacter spp., E. faecium, and P. aeruginosa.

Results

Between December 2020 and May 2025, 908 bacterial isolates were collected from Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, and Peru. Of these, 226 (25%) were obtained from invasive sites and correspond to predefined bacteria of epidemiological interest included in the analysis. Isolates were 39% nosocomial, 38% community-acquired, and 23% healthcare-associated. The main infections were spontaneous bacteremia (38%) and SBP (32%). Quinolone resistance was higher in Latin American vs. Europe for K. pneumoniae (56% vs. 34%) and E. coli (46% vs. 24%). Carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae was 46% (vs. 13%), and in E. coli, 5.3% (vs. 0.3%). Methicillin resistance among S. aureus was higher in Latin American (32%) than in Europe (16%). Other pathogens also showed higher resistance (Table).

Conclusions

The elevated resistance rates observed in Latin American patients with cirrhosis demand attention. In a region where regulatory gaps at multiple levels may contribute to antibiotic misuse, these findings call for urgent action to strengthen rational antibiotic use and implement effective stewardship strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of hepatology
Annals of hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Hepatology publishes original research on the biology and diseases of the liver in both humans and experimental models. Contributions may be submitted as regular articles. The journal also publishes concise reviews of both basic and clinical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信