移动医疗技术在癌症心血管健康研究中的应用:系统综述。

IF 7.7
PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-09-25 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001027
Roberto M Benzo, Anvitha Gogineni, Macy K Tetrick, Rujul Singh, Peter Washington, Soledad Fernandez, Electra D Paskett, Frank J Penedo, Sanam Ghazi, Alex Osei, Steven K Clinton, Jessica Krok-Schoen, Sarah Weyrauch, Daniel Addison
{"title":"移动医疗技术在癌症心血管健康研究中的应用:系统综述。","authors":"Roberto M Benzo, Anvitha Gogineni, Macy K Tetrick, Rujul Singh, Peter Washington, Soledad Fernandez, Electra D Paskett, Frank J Penedo, Sanam Ghazi, Alex Osei, Steven K Clinton, Jessica Krok-Schoen, Sarah Weyrauch, Daniel Addison","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0001027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cancer survivors face an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to treatment-related toxicity, lifestyle factors, and comorbidities. Addressing CV health is crucial for improving quality of life and long-term outcomes. The American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 framework highlights modifiable determinants of CV health, emphasizing early detection and monitoring. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, such as wearables and smartphone apps, offer continuous tracking, yet their applications in cancer survivorship remain unclear. This review systematically characterizes the types of mHealth technologies used to monitor CV health in cancer survivors, focusing on the specific data collected (major adverse CV events, CV risk factors, and surrogate endpoints) and the use of active versus passive collection methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science identified studies published between January 1, 2016, and June 13, 2024. Eligible studies included observational and interventional designs assessing at least one CV outcome using mHealth. Data were extracted on design, technology type, and outcomes. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. Fourteen studies (13 interventional, one observational) met criteria. Physical activity was the most monitored risk factor, followed by HR. The most common technologies were mobile apps and commercial wearables. Passive methods typically captured PA and HR, while active methods captured PA, symptom tracking, and diet. A key finding was the lack of integration with electronic medical records, highlighting a gap in clinical implementation. mHealth provides scalable tools to track CV health indicators in cancer survivors. Findings highlight the potential to support practice by enabling remote oversight of risk-reducing behaviors and guiding lifestyle interventions. However, we also identified gaps, including the underutilization of biomarkers (e.g., HRV) and the lack of integration with electronic records. Future research must address these gaps to translate real-time data into clinical insights and optimize survivorship care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 9","pages":"e0001027"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"mHealth technologies in research studying cardiovascular health in cancer: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto M Benzo, Anvitha Gogineni, Macy K Tetrick, Rujul Singh, Peter Washington, Soledad Fernandez, Electra D Paskett, Frank J Penedo, Sanam Ghazi, Alex Osei, Steven K Clinton, Jessica Krok-Schoen, Sarah Weyrauch, Daniel Addison\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0001027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cancer survivors face an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to treatment-related toxicity, lifestyle factors, and comorbidities. Addressing CV health is crucial for improving quality of life and long-term outcomes. The American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 framework highlights modifiable determinants of CV health, emphasizing early detection and monitoring. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, such as wearables and smartphone apps, offer continuous tracking, yet their applications in cancer survivorship remain unclear. This review systematically characterizes the types of mHealth technologies used to monitor CV health in cancer survivors, focusing on the specific data collected (major adverse CV events, CV risk factors, and surrogate endpoints) and the use of active versus passive collection methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science identified studies published between January 1, 2016, and June 13, 2024. Eligible studies included observational and interventional designs assessing at least one CV outcome using mHealth. Data were extracted on design, technology type, and outcomes. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. Fourteen studies (13 interventional, one observational) met criteria. Physical activity was the most monitored risk factor, followed by HR. The most common technologies were mobile apps and commercial wearables. Passive methods typically captured PA and HR, while active methods captured PA, symptom tracking, and diet. A key finding was the lack of integration with electronic medical records, highlighting a gap in clinical implementation. mHealth provides scalable tools to track CV health indicators in cancer survivors. Findings highlight the potential to support practice by enabling remote oversight of risk-reducing behaviors and guiding lifestyle interventions. However, we also identified gaps, including the underutilization of biomarkers (e.g., HRV) and the lack of integration with electronic records. Future research must address these gaps to translate real-time data into clinical insights and optimize survivorship care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 9\",\"pages\":\"e0001027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于治疗相关的毒性、生活方式因素和合并症,癌症幸存者面临心血管疾病(CVD)的风险增加。解决心血管健康问题对于改善生活质量和长期预后至关重要。美国心脏协会的生命基本框架强调了心血管健康的可改变决定因素,强调早期检测和监测。移动医疗(mHealth)技术,如可穿戴设备和智能手机应用程序,提供持续的跟踪,但它们在癌症幸存者中的应用尚不清楚。本综述系统地描述了用于监测癌症幸存者心血管健康的移动健康技术的类型,重点关注收集的特定数据(主要不良心血管事件、心血管危险因素和替代终点)以及主动和被动收集方法的使用。通过对PubMed、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science的系统搜索,确定了2016年1月1日至2024年6月13日之间发表的研究。符合条件的研究包括观察性和干预性设计,使用移动健康评估至少一种CV结果。提取设计、技术类型和结果方面的数据。使用Cochrane rob2和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。14项研究(13项介入性研究,1项观察性研究)符合标准。体力活动是最受监控的风险因素,其次是人力资源。最常见的技术是移动应用程序和商用可穿戴设备。被动方法通常捕获PA和HR,而主动方法捕获PA、症状跟踪和饮食。一项重要发现是缺乏与电子病历的整合,突出了临床实施方面的差距。移动健康提供可扩展的工具来跟踪癌症幸存者的心血管健康指标。研究结果强调了通过远程监督降低风险的行为和指导生活方式干预来支持实践的潜力。然而,我们也发现了差距,包括生物标志物(如HRV)的利用不足和缺乏与电子记录的整合。未来的研究必须解决这些差距,将实时数据转化为临床见解,并优化生存护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

mHealth technologies in research studying cardiovascular health in cancer: A systematic review.

mHealth technologies in research studying cardiovascular health in cancer: A systematic review.

mHealth technologies in research studying cardiovascular health in cancer: A systematic review.

mHealth technologies in research studying cardiovascular health in cancer: A systematic review.

Cancer survivors face an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to treatment-related toxicity, lifestyle factors, and comorbidities. Addressing CV health is crucial for improving quality of life and long-term outcomes. The American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 framework highlights modifiable determinants of CV health, emphasizing early detection and monitoring. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies, such as wearables and smartphone apps, offer continuous tracking, yet their applications in cancer survivorship remain unclear. This review systematically characterizes the types of mHealth technologies used to monitor CV health in cancer survivors, focusing on the specific data collected (major adverse CV events, CV risk factors, and surrogate endpoints) and the use of active versus passive collection methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science identified studies published between January 1, 2016, and June 13, 2024. Eligible studies included observational and interventional designs assessing at least one CV outcome using mHealth. Data were extracted on design, technology type, and outcomes. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. Fourteen studies (13 interventional, one observational) met criteria. Physical activity was the most monitored risk factor, followed by HR. The most common technologies were mobile apps and commercial wearables. Passive methods typically captured PA and HR, while active methods captured PA, symptom tracking, and diet. A key finding was the lack of integration with electronic medical records, highlighting a gap in clinical implementation. mHealth provides scalable tools to track CV health indicators in cancer survivors. Findings highlight the potential to support practice by enabling remote oversight of risk-reducing behaviors and guiding lifestyle interventions. However, we also identified gaps, including the underutilization of biomarkers (e.g., HRV) and the lack of integration with electronic records. Future research must address these gaps to translate real-time data into clinical insights and optimize survivorship care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信