Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Michael Kurt Memminger, Francesco Simeone, Tommaso Bardazzi, Maria Grazia Vaccaro, Giorgia Colarossi
{"title":"青少年纤维肌痛的治疗:一级循证系统评价。","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Michael Kurt Memminger, Francesco Simeone, Tommaso Bardazzi, Maria Grazia Vaccaro, Giorgia Colarossi","doi":"10.3390/medsci13030203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM) is a chronic pain disorder characterised by widespread musculoskeletal pain, functional impairment, fatigue, and mood disturbances. Treatment remains challenging, considering the multifactorial nature of the condition and the limited high-quality evidence supporting pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aimed to critically appraise level I evidence from randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for adolescents with JFM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven published peer-reviewed clinical trials were examined, including studies investigating duloxetine, milnacipran, pregabalin, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), and the integrated Fibromyalgia Integrative Training Teens (FIT) program, which combines CBT with neuromuscular training. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, functional disability, depression symptoms, physical activity, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pharmacological agents such as duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin demonstrated modest improvements in pain, but failed to produce consistent benefits in function or mood, and were associated with a high incidence of adverse effects. CBT significantly improved functional disability and depression symptoms, yet it had a limited impact on pain reduction or objectively measured activity levels. The FIT Teens program showed superior outcomes in pain intensity and biomechanical function compared to CBT alone, suggesting a synergistic effect of combining psychological and physical reconditioning strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence supports the use of multimodal treatment approaches in JFM. Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly when integrated with structured exercise, offer meaningful benefits with minimal safety concerns. Larger, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to establish optimal treatment pathways and long-term outcomes for this complex and underserved paediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Juvenile Fibromyalgia: A Level I Evidence-Based Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Michael Kurt Memminger, Francesco Simeone, Tommaso Bardazzi, Maria Grazia Vaccaro, Giorgia Colarossi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medsci13030203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM) is a chronic pain disorder characterised by widespread musculoskeletal pain, functional impairment, fatigue, and mood disturbances. Treatment remains challenging, considering the multifactorial nature of the condition and the limited high-quality evidence supporting pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aimed to critically appraise level I evidence from randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for adolescents with JFM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven published peer-reviewed clinical trials were examined, including studies investigating duloxetine, milnacipran, pregabalin, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), and the integrated Fibromyalgia Integrative Training Teens (FIT) program, which combines CBT with neuromuscular training. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, functional disability, depression symptoms, physical activity, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pharmacological agents such as duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin demonstrated modest improvements in pain, but failed to produce consistent benefits in function or mood, and were associated with a high incidence of adverse effects. CBT significantly improved functional disability and depression symptoms, yet it had a limited impact on pain reduction or objectively measured activity levels. The FIT Teens program showed superior outcomes in pain intensity and biomechanical function compared to CBT alone, suggesting a synergistic effect of combining psychological and physical reconditioning strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence supports the use of multimodal treatment approaches in JFM. Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly when integrated with structured exercise, offer meaningful benefits with minimal safety concerns. Larger, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to establish optimal treatment pathways and long-term outcomes for this complex and underserved paediatric population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of Juvenile Fibromyalgia: A Level I Evidence-Based Systematic Review.
Background: Juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM) is a chronic pain disorder characterised by widespread musculoskeletal pain, functional impairment, fatigue, and mood disturbances. Treatment remains challenging, considering the multifactorial nature of the condition and the limited high-quality evidence supporting pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions.
Objectives: This review aimed to critically appraise level I evidence from randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for adolescents with JFM.
Methods: Seven published peer-reviewed clinical trials were examined, including studies investigating duloxetine, milnacipran, pregabalin, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), and the integrated Fibromyalgia Integrative Training Teens (FIT) program, which combines CBT with neuromuscular training. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, functional disability, depression symptoms, physical activity, and adverse events.
Results: Pharmacological agents such as duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin demonstrated modest improvements in pain, but failed to produce consistent benefits in function or mood, and were associated with a high incidence of adverse effects. CBT significantly improved functional disability and depression symptoms, yet it had a limited impact on pain reduction or objectively measured activity levels. The FIT Teens program showed superior outcomes in pain intensity and biomechanical function compared to CBT alone, suggesting a synergistic effect of combining psychological and physical reconditioning strategies.
Conclusions: Current evidence supports the use of multimodal treatment approaches in JFM. Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly when integrated with structured exercise, offer meaningful benefits with minimal safety concerns. Larger, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to establish optimal treatment pathways and long-term outcomes for this complex and underserved paediatric population.