青少年纤维肌痛的治疗:一级循证系统评价。

IF 4.4 Q1 Medicine
Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Michael Kurt Memminger, Francesco Simeone, Tommaso Bardazzi, Maria Grazia Vaccaro, Giorgia Colarossi
{"title":"青少年纤维肌痛的治疗:一级循证系统评价。","authors":"Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Michael Kurt Memminger, Francesco Simeone, Tommaso Bardazzi, Maria Grazia Vaccaro, Giorgia Colarossi","doi":"10.3390/medsci13030203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM) is a chronic pain disorder characterised by widespread musculoskeletal pain, functional impairment, fatigue, and mood disturbances. Treatment remains challenging, considering the multifactorial nature of the condition and the limited high-quality evidence supporting pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aimed to critically appraise level I evidence from randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for adolescents with JFM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven published peer-reviewed clinical trials were examined, including studies investigating duloxetine, milnacipran, pregabalin, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), and the integrated Fibromyalgia Integrative Training Teens (FIT) program, which combines CBT with neuromuscular training. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, functional disability, depression symptoms, physical activity, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pharmacological agents such as duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin demonstrated modest improvements in pain, but failed to produce consistent benefits in function or mood, and were associated with a high incidence of adverse effects. CBT significantly improved functional disability and depression symptoms, yet it had a limited impact on pain reduction or objectively measured activity levels. The FIT Teens program showed superior outcomes in pain intensity and biomechanical function compared to CBT alone, suggesting a synergistic effect of combining psychological and physical reconditioning strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence supports the use of multimodal treatment approaches in JFM. Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly when integrated with structured exercise, offer meaningful benefits with minimal safety concerns. Larger, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to establish optimal treatment pathways and long-term outcomes for this complex and underserved paediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74152,"journal":{"name":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Juvenile Fibromyalgia: A Level I Evidence-Based Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Michael Kurt Memminger, Francesco Simeone, Tommaso Bardazzi, Maria Grazia Vaccaro, Giorgia Colarossi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medsci13030203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM) is a chronic pain disorder characterised by widespread musculoskeletal pain, functional impairment, fatigue, and mood disturbances. Treatment remains challenging, considering the multifactorial nature of the condition and the limited high-quality evidence supporting pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aimed to critically appraise level I evidence from randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for adolescents with JFM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven published peer-reviewed clinical trials were examined, including studies investigating duloxetine, milnacipran, pregabalin, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), and the integrated Fibromyalgia Integrative Training Teens (FIT) program, which combines CBT with neuromuscular training. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, functional disability, depression symptoms, physical activity, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pharmacological agents such as duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin demonstrated modest improvements in pain, but failed to produce consistent benefits in function or mood, and were associated with a high incidence of adverse effects. CBT significantly improved functional disability and depression symptoms, yet it had a limited impact on pain reduction or objectively measured activity levels. The FIT Teens program showed superior outcomes in pain intensity and biomechanical function compared to CBT alone, suggesting a synergistic effect of combining psychological and physical reconditioning strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence supports the use of multimodal treatment approaches in JFM. Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly when integrated with structured exercise, offer meaningful benefits with minimal safety concerns. Larger, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to establish optimal treatment pathways and long-term outcomes for this complex and underserved paediatric population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:青少年纤维肌痛(JFM)是一种以广泛的肌肉骨骼疼痛、功能障碍、疲劳和情绪障碍为特征的慢性疼痛疾病。考虑到该病的多因素性质以及支持药物或非药物干预的高质量证据有限,治疗仍然具有挑战性。目的:本综述旨在严格评价来自随机对照试验的I级证据,评估青少年JFM的药物和非药物治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:研究了7项已发表的同行评审临床试验,包括调查度洛西汀、米那西普兰、普瑞巴林、认知行为疗法(CBT)和纤维肌痛综合训练青少年(FIT)计划的研究,该计划将CBT与神经肌肉训练相结合。研究结果包括疼痛强度、功能障碍、抑郁症状、身体活动和不良事件。结果:诸如度洛西汀、米那西普兰和普瑞巴林等药物在疼痛方面表现出适度的改善,但未能在功能或情绪方面产生持续的益处,并且与高发生率的不良反应相关。CBT显著改善了功能障碍和抑郁症状,但对减轻疼痛或客观测量活动水平的影响有限。与单独的CBT相比,FIT青少年项目在疼痛强度和生物力学功能方面显示出更好的结果,这表明心理和身体恢复策略相结合的协同效应。结论:目前的证据支持在JFM中使用多模式治疗方法。非药物干预,特别是当与有组织的锻炼相结合时,提供了有意义的好处,而安全问题最小。需要更大规模、方法学上严格的试验,为这一复杂且得不到充分服务的儿科人群建立最佳治疗途径和长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of Juvenile Fibromyalgia: A Level I Evidence-Based Systematic Review.

Background: Juvenile fibromyalgia (JFM) is a chronic pain disorder characterised by widespread musculoskeletal pain, functional impairment, fatigue, and mood disturbances. Treatment remains challenging, considering the multifactorial nature of the condition and the limited high-quality evidence supporting pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions.

Objectives: This review aimed to critically appraise level I evidence from randomised controlled trials assessing the efficacy and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for adolescents with JFM.

Methods: Seven published peer-reviewed clinical trials were examined, including studies investigating duloxetine, milnacipran, pregabalin, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), and the integrated Fibromyalgia Integrative Training Teens (FIT) program, which combines CBT with neuromuscular training. Outcomes of interest included pain intensity, functional disability, depression symptoms, physical activity, and adverse events.

Results: Pharmacological agents such as duloxetine, milnacipran, and pregabalin demonstrated modest improvements in pain, but failed to produce consistent benefits in function or mood, and were associated with a high incidence of adverse effects. CBT significantly improved functional disability and depression symptoms, yet it had a limited impact on pain reduction or objectively measured activity levels. The FIT Teens program showed superior outcomes in pain intensity and biomechanical function compared to CBT alone, suggesting a synergistic effect of combining psychological and physical reconditioning strategies.

Conclusions: Current evidence supports the use of multimodal treatment approaches in JFM. Non-pharmacological interventions, particularly when integrated with structured exercise, offer meaningful benefits with minimal safety concerns. Larger, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to establish optimal treatment pathways and long-term outcomes for this complex and underserved paediatric population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信