转移性与非转移性结直肠癌的初始医疗和处方费用

IF 3.3 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Chi M Nguyen, Paul G Yeh, Mai P Nguyen, Travis S Johnson, Hyunwoo Koo, Victoria L Champion, Todd C Skaar, David R Lairson, Patrick O Monahan, Thomas F Imperiale, Hongmei Nan
{"title":"转移性与非转移性结直肠癌的初始医疗和处方费用","authors":"Chi M Nguyen, Paul G Yeh, Mai P Nguyen, Travis S Johnson, Hyunwoo Koo, Victoria L Champion, Todd C Skaar, David R Lairson, Patrick O Monahan, Thomas F Imperiale, Hongmei Nan","doi":"10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death and among the costliest cancers to treat in the United States. As advanced-stage diagnoses rise, the initial-care cost differences between metastatic (mCRC) and non-metastatic CRC (non-mCRC) remain unclear, limiting insight into the financial impact of metastasis and late detection. Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart, the largest U.S. commercial claims database, we examined first-year costs of care for patients aged ≥45 newly diagnosed with CRC between 2017 and 2023, with at least one year of medical records before and after diagnosis. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models estimated the impact of metastasis on medical and prescription charges and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses (2023 USD) in relation to treatment components, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and hospice care. Among 25,169 patients, 32.8% had metastasis at diagnosis. Treatment and care utilization were consistently higher for mCRC patients, with the greatest disparity in pharmacotherapy use (79.1% vs. 26.9%), followed by ED visits (65.4% vs. 48.1%), hospitalizations (91.1% vs. 84.0%), radiation therapy, and hospice care. Medical and prescription charges for mCRC patients ($353,255 and $5,745) were nearly double those for non-mCRC ($182,000 and $2,406), as were OOP expenses ($4,032 vs. $2,144 for medical; $319 vs. $188 for prescriptions). Pharmacotherapy was the primary cost driver in mCRC, followed by hospitalizations and ED visits. Initial-care medical and prescription costs were substantially higher for mCRC patients. These findings underscore the economic burden of metastasis, highlighting potential benefits and cost savings of early detection and intervention strategies such as routine screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":72516,"journal":{"name":"Cancer research communications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial-Care Medical and Prescription Costs for Incident Metastatic versus Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Chi M Nguyen, Paul G Yeh, Mai P Nguyen, Travis S Johnson, Hyunwoo Koo, Victoria L Champion, Todd C Skaar, David R Lairson, Patrick O Monahan, Thomas F Imperiale, Hongmei Nan\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death and among the costliest cancers to treat in the United States. As advanced-stage diagnoses rise, the initial-care cost differences between metastatic (mCRC) and non-metastatic CRC (non-mCRC) remain unclear, limiting insight into the financial impact of metastasis and late detection. Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart, the largest U.S. commercial claims database, we examined first-year costs of care for patients aged ≥45 newly diagnosed with CRC between 2017 and 2023, with at least one year of medical records before and after diagnosis. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models estimated the impact of metastasis on medical and prescription charges and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses (2023 USD) in relation to treatment components, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and hospice care. Among 25,169 patients, 32.8% had metastasis at diagnosis. Treatment and care utilization were consistently higher for mCRC patients, with the greatest disparity in pharmacotherapy use (79.1% vs. 26.9%), followed by ED visits (65.4% vs. 48.1%), hospitalizations (91.1% vs. 84.0%), radiation therapy, and hospice care. Medical and prescription charges for mCRC patients ($353,255 and $5,745) were nearly double those for non-mCRC ($182,000 and $2,406), as were OOP expenses ($4,032 vs. $2,144 for medical; $319 vs. $188 for prescriptions). Pharmacotherapy was the primary cost driver in mCRC, followed by hospitalizations and ED visits. Initial-care medical and prescription costs were substantially higher for mCRC patients. These findings underscore the economic burden of metastasis, highlighting potential benefits and cost savings of early detection and intervention strategies such as routine screening.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer research communications\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer research communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-25-0367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)是癌症相关死亡的主要原因,也是美国治疗成本最高的癌症之一。随着晚期诊断的增加,转移性(mCRC)和非转移性CRC (non-mCRC)之间的初始护理成本差异仍不清楚,限制了对转移和晚期检测的财务影响的了解。使用Optum的去识别Clinformatics®数据集市(美国最大的商业索赔数据库),我们检查了2017年至2023年间新诊断为CRC的年龄≥45岁患者的第一年护理成本,这些患者在诊断前后至少有一年的医疗记录。多变量线性混合效应模型估计了转移对医疗和处方费用以及与治疗成分、急诊(ED)就诊、住院和临终关怀相关的自费(2023美元)费用的影响。在25169例患者中,32.8%在诊断时发生转移。mCRC患者的治疗和护理利用率一直较高,药物治疗使用差异最大(79.1%对26.9%),其次是急诊科就诊(65.4%对48.1%)、住院(91.1%对84.0%)、放射治疗和临终关怀。mCRC患者的医疗和处方费用(353,255美元和5,745美元)几乎是非mCRC患者(182,000美元和2,406美元)的两倍,OOP费用(4,032美元对2,144美元医疗费用;319美元对188美元处方费用)也是如此。药物治疗是mCRC的主要成本驱动因素,其次是住院和急诊科就诊。mCRC患者的初始医疗和处方费用要高得多。这些发现强调了转移的经济负担,强调了早期发现和干预策略(如常规筛查)的潜在益处和成本节约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial-Care Medical and Prescription Costs for Incident Metastatic versus Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death and among the costliest cancers to treat in the United States. As advanced-stage diagnoses rise, the initial-care cost differences between metastatic (mCRC) and non-metastatic CRC (non-mCRC) remain unclear, limiting insight into the financial impact of metastasis and late detection. Using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart, the largest U.S. commercial claims database, we examined first-year costs of care for patients aged ≥45 newly diagnosed with CRC between 2017 and 2023, with at least one year of medical records before and after diagnosis. Multivariate linear mixed-effects models estimated the impact of metastasis on medical and prescription charges and out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses (2023 USD) in relation to treatment components, emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and hospice care. Among 25,169 patients, 32.8% had metastasis at diagnosis. Treatment and care utilization were consistently higher for mCRC patients, with the greatest disparity in pharmacotherapy use (79.1% vs. 26.9%), followed by ED visits (65.4% vs. 48.1%), hospitalizations (91.1% vs. 84.0%), radiation therapy, and hospice care. Medical and prescription charges for mCRC patients ($353,255 and $5,745) were nearly double those for non-mCRC ($182,000 and $2,406), as were OOP expenses ($4,032 vs. $2,144 for medical; $319 vs. $188 for prescriptions). Pharmacotherapy was the primary cost driver in mCRC, followed by hospitalizations and ED visits. Initial-care medical and prescription costs were substantially higher for mCRC patients. These findings underscore the economic burden of metastasis, highlighting potential benefits and cost savings of early detection and intervention strategies such as routine screening.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信