跨止血带设计的首次使用学习。

Q3 Medicine
Piper Lynn Wall, Charisse M Buising, Catherine Hackett Renner
{"title":"跨止血带设计的首次使用学习。","authors":"Piper Lynn Wall, Charisse M Buising, Catherine Hackett Renner","doi":"10.55460/QTWH-TG7Q","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We hypothesized shared-design tourniquet features have useful first-use learning when knowledge-of-results occurs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prior study, after watching training videos, 64 volunteers were videoed applying (Latin squares randomization): Combat Application Tourniquet Generation 7 ™ (CAT7), SOF ™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 3 (SOFTTW3), SOF™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 5 (SOFTTW5), Tactical Mechanical Tourniquet® (TMT), OMNA Marine Tourniquet™ (OMT), X8T-Tourniquet (X8T), Tactical Ratcheting Medical Tourniquet™ (Tac RMT), and RapidStop® Tourniquet (RST). Tourniquets were applied to live thighs with audible distal Doppler pulses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study subset was 10 experienced and 33 no-experience appliers. Experienced appliers had fewer strap/redirect and fewer tightening-system understanding problems and faster associated times than no-experience appliers. Among no-experience appliers, firstuse learning was supported by faster \"Go\" to \"strap secured\" times for combined seventh and eighth versus first applications (p=.008), secondversus first-encounter CAT7/OMT applications (p=.0005), and secondversus first-encounter SOFTTW3/ SOFTTW5 applications (p=.079). Occlusion at \"Done\" was more frequent with experienced appliers (p=.006) and did not show first-use learning across all tourniquets in no-experience appliers. Occlusion at \"Done\" indicated possible first-use learning with ratcheting-buckle versus windlass-rod tightening systems (p=.028, no-experience appliers). Hook-and-loop strap security, which provides no inherent knowledge-of-results, showed no learning in experienced (five problem applications by two appliers) or no-experience appliers (29 problem applications by 18 appliers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge-of-results is critical for, but does not guarantee, tourniquet-application-useful first-use learning. The existence of first-use learning can allow limited experience with one tourniquet to improve performance with a different tourniquet with shared-design features. Therefore, exposure to different designs may have value, and providing tourniquet-training knowledge-of-results is important.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":"46-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Across Tourniquet Designs First-Use Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Piper Lynn Wall, Charisse M Buising, Catherine Hackett Renner\",\"doi\":\"10.55460/QTWH-TG7Q\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We hypothesized shared-design tourniquet features have useful first-use learning when knowledge-of-results occurs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prior study, after watching training videos, 64 volunteers were videoed applying (Latin squares randomization): Combat Application Tourniquet Generation 7 ™ (CAT7), SOF ™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 3 (SOFTTW3), SOF™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 5 (SOFTTW5), Tactical Mechanical Tourniquet® (TMT), OMNA Marine Tourniquet™ (OMT), X8T-Tourniquet (X8T), Tactical Ratcheting Medical Tourniquet™ (Tac RMT), and RapidStop® Tourniquet (RST). Tourniquets were applied to live thighs with audible distal Doppler pulses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study subset was 10 experienced and 33 no-experience appliers. Experienced appliers had fewer strap/redirect and fewer tightening-system understanding problems and faster associated times than no-experience appliers. Among no-experience appliers, firstuse learning was supported by faster \\\"Go\\\" to \\\"strap secured\\\" times for combined seventh and eighth versus first applications (p=.008), secondversus first-encounter CAT7/OMT applications (p=.0005), and secondversus first-encounter SOFTTW3/ SOFTTW5 applications (p=.079). Occlusion at \\\"Done\\\" was more frequent with experienced appliers (p=.006) and did not show first-use learning across all tourniquets in no-experience appliers. Occlusion at \\\"Done\\\" indicated possible first-use learning with ratcheting-buckle versus windlass-rod tightening systems (p=.028, no-experience appliers). Hook-and-loop strap security, which provides no inherent knowledge-of-results, showed no learning in experienced (five problem applications by two appliers) or no-experience appliers (29 problem applications by 18 appliers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge-of-results is critical for, but does not guarantee, tourniquet-application-useful first-use learning. The existence of first-use learning can allow limited experience with one tourniquet to improve performance with a different tourniquet with shared-design features. Therefore, exposure to different designs may have value, and providing tourniquet-training knowledge-of-results is important.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"46-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55460/QTWH-TG7Q\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/QTWH-TG7Q","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们假设共享设计止血带特征在结果知识发生时具有有用的首次使用学习。方法:在之前的研究中,在观看培训视频后,64名志愿者被拍摄了使用(拉丁方格随机化)的视频:战斗应用止血带第7代™(CAT7)、softm战术止血带第3代(SOFTTW3)、softm战术止血带第5代(SOFTTW5)、战术机械止血带®(TMT)、OMNA海上止血带™(OMT)、X8T-止血带(X8T)、战术Ratcheting医用止血带™(Tac RMT)和RapidStop®止血带(RST)。止血带应用于活大腿,远端多普勒脉冲可听。结果:本研究子集为10名有经验的应用者和33名无经验的应用者。与没有经验的应用程序相比,有经验的应用程序有更少的绑带/重定向和更少的紧固系统理解问题和更快的关联时间。在没有经验的申请者中,与第一次应用相比,第7次和第8次应用从“Go”到“strap secured”的时间更快(p= 0.008),第二次与第一次使用CAT7/OMT应用相比(p= 0.005),第二次与第一次使用SOFTTW3/ SOFTTW5应用相比(p= 0.079)。有经验的应用者在“完成”时的闭塞更频繁(p= 0.006),并且在所有无经验的应用者中没有显示出首次使用学习。“完成”时的闭塞表明可能首次使用棘轮扣与卷绕杆拧紧系统进行学习(p= 0.028,无经验应用者)。钩环带安全性不提供固有的结果知识,在有经验的(两个应用程序的5个问题应用程序)或没有经验的应用程序(18个应用程序的29个问题应用程序)中没有学习。结论:对结果的了解对于止血带应用的首次使用学习至关重要,但不能保证。首次使用学习的存在可以使使用一种止血带的有限经验提高使用具有相同设计特征的不同止血带的性能。因此,接触不同的设计可能是有价值的,提供止血带训练的结果知识是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Across Tourniquet Designs First-Use Learning.

Background: We hypothesized shared-design tourniquet features have useful first-use learning when knowledge-of-results occurs.

Methods: In a prior study, after watching training videos, 64 volunteers were videoed applying (Latin squares randomization): Combat Application Tourniquet Generation 7 ™ (CAT7), SOF ™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 3 (SOFTTW3), SOF™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 5 (SOFTTW5), Tactical Mechanical Tourniquet® (TMT), OMNA Marine Tourniquet™ (OMT), X8T-Tourniquet (X8T), Tactical Ratcheting Medical Tourniquet™ (Tac RMT), and RapidStop® Tourniquet (RST). Tourniquets were applied to live thighs with audible distal Doppler pulses.

Results: This study subset was 10 experienced and 33 no-experience appliers. Experienced appliers had fewer strap/redirect and fewer tightening-system understanding problems and faster associated times than no-experience appliers. Among no-experience appliers, firstuse learning was supported by faster "Go" to "strap secured" times for combined seventh and eighth versus first applications (p=.008), secondversus first-encounter CAT7/OMT applications (p=.0005), and secondversus first-encounter SOFTTW3/ SOFTTW5 applications (p=.079). Occlusion at "Done" was more frequent with experienced appliers (p=.006) and did not show first-use learning across all tourniquets in no-experience appliers. Occlusion at "Done" indicated possible first-use learning with ratcheting-buckle versus windlass-rod tightening systems (p=.028, no-experience appliers). Hook-and-loop strap security, which provides no inherent knowledge-of-results, showed no learning in experienced (five problem applications by two appliers) or no-experience appliers (29 problem applications by 18 appliers).

Conclusions: Knowledge-of-results is critical for, but does not guarantee, tourniquet-application-useful first-use learning. The existence of first-use learning can allow limited experience with one tourniquet to improve performance with a different tourniquet with shared-design features. Therefore, exposure to different designs may have value, and providing tourniquet-training knowledge-of-results is important.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信