Piper Lynn Wall, Charisse M Buising, Catherine Hackett Renner
{"title":"跨止血带设计的首次使用学习。","authors":"Piper Lynn Wall, Charisse M Buising, Catherine Hackett Renner","doi":"10.55460/QTWH-TG7Q","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We hypothesized shared-design tourniquet features have useful first-use learning when knowledge-of-results occurs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prior study, after watching training videos, 64 volunteers were videoed applying (Latin squares randomization): Combat Application Tourniquet Generation 7 ™ (CAT7), SOF ™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 3 (SOFTTW3), SOF™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 5 (SOFTTW5), Tactical Mechanical Tourniquet® (TMT), OMNA Marine Tourniquet™ (OMT), X8T-Tourniquet (X8T), Tactical Ratcheting Medical Tourniquet™ (Tac RMT), and RapidStop® Tourniquet (RST). Tourniquets were applied to live thighs with audible distal Doppler pulses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study subset was 10 experienced and 33 no-experience appliers. Experienced appliers had fewer strap/redirect and fewer tightening-system understanding problems and faster associated times than no-experience appliers. Among no-experience appliers, firstuse learning was supported by faster \"Go\" to \"strap secured\" times for combined seventh and eighth versus first applications (p=.008), secondversus first-encounter CAT7/OMT applications (p=.0005), and secondversus first-encounter SOFTTW3/ SOFTTW5 applications (p=.079). Occlusion at \"Done\" was more frequent with experienced appliers (p=.006) and did not show first-use learning across all tourniquets in no-experience appliers. Occlusion at \"Done\" indicated possible first-use learning with ratcheting-buckle versus windlass-rod tightening systems (p=.028, no-experience appliers). Hook-and-loop strap security, which provides no inherent knowledge-of-results, showed no learning in experienced (five problem applications by two appliers) or no-experience appliers (29 problem applications by 18 appliers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge-of-results is critical for, but does not guarantee, tourniquet-application-useful first-use learning. The existence of first-use learning can allow limited experience with one tourniquet to improve performance with a different tourniquet with shared-design features. Therefore, exposure to different designs may have value, and providing tourniquet-training knowledge-of-results is important.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":"46-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Across Tourniquet Designs First-Use Learning.\",\"authors\":\"Piper Lynn Wall, Charisse M Buising, Catherine Hackett Renner\",\"doi\":\"10.55460/QTWH-TG7Q\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We hypothesized shared-design tourniquet features have useful first-use learning when knowledge-of-results occurs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prior study, after watching training videos, 64 volunteers were videoed applying (Latin squares randomization): Combat Application Tourniquet Generation 7 ™ (CAT7), SOF ™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 3 (SOFTTW3), SOF™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 5 (SOFTTW5), Tactical Mechanical Tourniquet® (TMT), OMNA Marine Tourniquet™ (OMT), X8T-Tourniquet (X8T), Tactical Ratcheting Medical Tourniquet™ (Tac RMT), and RapidStop® Tourniquet (RST). Tourniquets were applied to live thighs with audible distal Doppler pulses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study subset was 10 experienced and 33 no-experience appliers. Experienced appliers had fewer strap/redirect and fewer tightening-system understanding problems and faster associated times than no-experience appliers. Among no-experience appliers, firstuse learning was supported by faster \\\"Go\\\" to \\\"strap secured\\\" times for combined seventh and eighth versus first applications (p=.008), secondversus first-encounter CAT7/OMT applications (p=.0005), and secondversus first-encounter SOFTTW3/ SOFTTW5 applications (p=.079). Occlusion at \\\"Done\\\" was more frequent with experienced appliers (p=.006) and did not show first-use learning across all tourniquets in no-experience appliers. Occlusion at \\\"Done\\\" indicated possible first-use learning with ratcheting-buckle versus windlass-rod tightening systems (p=.028, no-experience appliers). Hook-and-loop strap security, which provides no inherent knowledge-of-results, showed no learning in experienced (five problem applications by two appliers) or no-experience appliers (29 problem applications by 18 appliers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge-of-results is critical for, but does not guarantee, tourniquet-application-useful first-use learning. The existence of first-use learning can allow limited experience with one tourniquet to improve performance with a different tourniquet with shared-design features. Therefore, exposure to different designs may have value, and providing tourniquet-training knowledge-of-results is important.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"46-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55460/QTWH-TG7Q\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/QTWH-TG7Q","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: We hypothesized shared-design tourniquet features have useful first-use learning when knowledge-of-results occurs.
Methods: In a prior study, after watching training videos, 64 volunteers were videoed applying (Latin squares randomization): Combat Application Tourniquet Generation 7 ™ (CAT7), SOF ™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 3 (SOFTTW3), SOF™ Tactical Tourniquet-Wide Generation 5 (SOFTTW5), Tactical Mechanical Tourniquet® (TMT), OMNA Marine Tourniquet™ (OMT), X8T-Tourniquet (X8T), Tactical Ratcheting Medical Tourniquet™ (Tac RMT), and RapidStop® Tourniquet (RST). Tourniquets were applied to live thighs with audible distal Doppler pulses.
Results: This study subset was 10 experienced and 33 no-experience appliers. Experienced appliers had fewer strap/redirect and fewer tightening-system understanding problems and faster associated times than no-experience appliers. Among no-experience appliers, firstuse learning was supported by faster "Go" to "strap secured" times for combined seventh and eighth versus first applications (p=.008), secondversus first-encounter CAT7/OMT applications (p=.0005), and secondversus first-encounter SOFTTW3/ SOFTTW5 applications (p=.079). Occlusion at "Done" was more frequent with experienced appliers (p=.006) and did not show first-use learning across all tourniquets in no-experience appliers. Occlusion at "Done" indicated possible first-use learning with ratcheting-buckle versus windlass-rod tightening systems (p=.028, no-experience appliers). Hook-and-loop strap security, which provides no inherent knowledge-of-results, showed no learning in experienced (five problem applications by two appliers) or no-experience appliers (29 problem applications by 18 appliers).
Conclusions: Knowledge-of-results is critical for, but does not guarantee, tourniquet-application-useful first-use learning. The existence of first-use learning can allow limited experience with one tourniquet to improve performance with a different tourniquet with shared-design features. Therefore, exposure to different designs may have value, and providing tourniquet-training knowledge-of-results is important.