肿瘤患者教育的有效教学策略与方法综述。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Janet Papadakos, Lisa Durocher-Allen, Deborah Devitt, Lester Krames, Karen Lawrie, Naomi Pocrnic, Aalima Premji, Adrienne Sultana, Susanna Wong
{"title":"肿瘤患者教育的有效教学策略与方法综述。","authors":"Janet Papadakos, Lisa Durocher-Allen, Deborah Devitt, Lester Krames, Karen Lawrie, Naomi Pocrnic, Aalima Premji, Adrienne Sultana, Susanna Wong","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02732-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient education is crucial for supporting individuals Living with or at risk of cancer. It empowers them with the knowledge necessary to navigate their diagnosis and treatment plan, improve health and digital health Literacy, and facilitate meaningful care engagement. There is a lack of current evidence on the most effective teaching strategies and methods for supporting individuals living with or at risk of developing cancer. As such, this systematic review aims to explore effective cancer patient education strategies and methods in terms of knowledge, physical and psychological well-being, satisfaction, experience, and self-efficacy. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Prospero, and Epistemonikos.org for Guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published between January 2018 and June 2024, capturing the key concepts of teaching strategies or delivery methods for cancer patient education. Of the 3762 articles screened, 27 met the inclusion criteria. Study findings showed that one-on-one and group teaching strategies are effective in terms of improving psychological well-being, reducing anxiety, and enhancing cancer-related knowledge. The combination of these strategies in a multi-modality teaching strategy is effective in addressing diverse needs of learners and enhancing outcomes. Teaching materials and methods, including tailored written materials, verbal discussion, audio-visual materials, and technology-based tools (e.g., eLearning platforms), are effective strategies in different contexts, with certain aspects that should be carefully considered. By considering these various teaching strategies and the context in which they are most effective, learners can be better empowered to make informed decisions regarding their health and care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review on the Effective Teaching Strategies and Methods for Cancer Patient Education.\",\"authors\":\"Janet Papadakos, Lisa Durocher-Allen, Deborah Devitt, Lester Krames, Karen Lawrie, Naomi Pocrnic, Aalima Premji, Adrienne Sultana, Susanna Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02732-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patient education is crucial for supporting individuals Living with or at risk of cancer. It empowers them with the knowledge necessary to navigate their diagnosis and treatment plan, improve health and digital health Literacy, and facilitate meaningful care engagement. There is a lack of current evidence on the most effective teaching strategies and methods for supporting individuals living with or at risk of developing cancer. As such, this systematic review aims to explore effective cancer patient education strategies and methods in terms of knowledge, physical and psychological well-being, satisfaction, experience, and self-efficacy. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Prospero, and Epistemonikos.org for Guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published between January 2018 and June 2024, capturing the key concepts of teaching strategies or delivery methods for cancer patient education. Of the 3762 articles screened, 27 met the inclusion criteria. Study findings showed that one-on-one and group teaching strategies are effective in terms of improving psychological well-being, reducing anxiety, and enhancing cancer-related knowledge. The combination of these strategies in a multi-modality teaching strategy is effective in addressing diverse needs of learners and enhancing outcomes. Teaching materials and methods, including tailored written materials, verbal discussion, audio-visual materials, and technology-based tools (e.g., eLearning platforms), are effective strategies in different contexts, with certain aspects that should be carefully considered. By considering these various teaching strategies and the context in which they are most effective, learners can be better empowered to make informed decisions regarding their health and care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02732-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02732-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者教育对于支持癌症患者或有癌症风险的人至关重要。它使他们能够获得必要的知识,以指导他们的诊断和治疗计划,改善健康和数字健康素养,并促进有意义的护理参与。对于支持癌症患者或有患癌风险的个人,目前缺乏最有效的教学策略和方法的证据。因此,本系统综述旨在从知识、身心健康、满意度、体验和自我效能等方面探讨有效的癌症患者教育策略和方法。我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane系统评价数据库、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Prospero和Epistemonikos.org,检索了2018年1月至2024年6月期间发表的指南、系统评价和荟萃分析,捕捉了癌症患者教育教学策略或传递方法的关键概念。在筛选的3762篇文章中,27篇符合纳入标准。研究结果表明,一对一和小组教学策略在改善心理健康、减少焦虑和增强癌症相关知识方面是有效的。这些策略在多模态教学策略中的结合对于满足学习者的不同需求和提高教学效果是有效的。教材和教学方法,包括量身定制的书面材料、口头讨论、视听材料和基于技术的工具(如电子学习平台),在不同的背景下都是有效的策略,但在某些方面应该仔细考虑。通过考虑这些不同的教学策略及其最有效的环境,学习者可以更好地获得能力,就其健康和护理作出知情决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review on the Effective Teaching Strategies and Methods for Cancer Patient Education.

Patient education is crucial for supporting individuals Living with or at risk of cancer. It empowers them with the knowledge necessary to navigate their diagnosis and treatment plan, improve health and digital health Literacy, and facilitate meaningful care engagement. There is a lack of current evidence on the most effective teaching strategies and methods for supporting individuals living with or at risk of developing cancer. As such, this systematic review aims to explore effective cancer patient education strategies and methods in terms of knowledge, physical and psychological well-being, satisfaction, experience, and self-efficacy. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Prospero, and Epistemonikos.org for Guidelines, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published between January 2018 and June 2024, capturing the key concepts of teaching strategies or delivery methods for cancer patient education. Of the 3762 articles screened, 27 met the inclusion criteria. Study findings showed that one-on-one and group teaching strategies are effective in terms of improving psychological well-being, reducing anxiety, and enhancing cancer-related knowledge. The combination of these strategies in a multi-modality teaching strategy is effective in addressing diverse needs of learners and enhancing outcomes. Teaching materials and methods, including tailored written materials, verbal discussion, audio-visual materials, and technology-based tools (e.g., eLearning platforms), are effective strategies in different contexts, with certain aspects that should be carefully considered. By considering these various teaching strategies and the context in which they are most effective, learners can be better empowered to make informed decisions regarding their health and care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信