儿童和青少年能力评估中的标准化能力措施和认知:系统综述。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Psychiatry Psychology and Law Pub Date : 2024-09-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/13218719.2024.2346716
Elizabeth Beaumont, Melanie A Porter
{"title":"儿童和青少年能力评估中的标准化能力措施和认知:系统综述。","authors":"Elizabeth Beaumont, Melanie A Porter","doi":"10.1080/13218719.2024.2346716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While there is increasing use of standardised tools to assist in determining decision-making capacity in adults, there is limited literature evaluating these tools in children/adolescents. The current PRISMA guided systematic review aimed to evaluate standardised capacity assessment tools used in the child/adolescent population, and to examine the relationship between these capacity assessment tools and cognition. Inclusion criteria comprised: (1) validation of a new/existing tool to assess capacity or competence; (2) participants < 18 years; (3) involved validation on normative or non-normative populations; (4) published in English in a peer review journal. Ten studies were included. The majority applied a version of the Macarthur Competence Assessment Tool. Findings suggest capacity assessment tools demonstrate sound psychometric properties, but research into capacity assessment in children is still in its infancy. Limitations include the lack of diagnostic gold standard of capacity and the inconsistent and minimal incorporation of cognitive functioning into standardised capacity assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":51553,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","volume":"32 5","pages":"646-670"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459190/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardised capacity measures and cognition in the assessment of capacity in children and adolescents: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Beaumont, Melanie A Porter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13218719.2024.2346716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While there is increasing use of standardised tools to assist in determining decision-making capacity in adults, there is limited literature evaluating these tools in children/adolescents. The current PRISMA guided systematic review aimed to evaluate standardised capacity assessment tools used in the child/adolescent population, and to examine the relationship between these capacity assessment tools and cognition. Inclusion criteria comprised: (1) validation of a new/existing tool to assess capacity or competence; (2) participants < 18 years; (3) involved validation on normative or non-normative populations; (4) published in English in a peer review journal. Ten studies were included. The majority applied a version of the Macarthur Competence Assessment Tool. Findings suggest capacity assessment tools demonstrate sound psychometric properties, but research into capacity assessment in children is still in its infancy. Limitations include the lack of diagnostic gold standard of capacity and the inconsistent and minimal incorporation of cognitive functioning into standardised capacity assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Psychology and Law\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"646-670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459190/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Psychology and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2346716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2346716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然越来越多地使用标准化工具来帮助确定成人的决策能力,但在儿童/青少年中评估这些工具的文献有限。当前的PRISMA指导系统评价旨在评估儿童/青少年人群中使用的标准化能力评估工具,并检查这些能力评估工具与认知之间的关系。纳入标准包括:(1)评估能力或胜任能力的新/现有工具的验证;(2)年龄< 18岁;(3)涉及规范或非规范人群的验证;(4)在同行评议期刊上以英文发表。纳入了10项研究。大多数人使用麦克阿瑟能力评估工具的一个版本。研究结果表明,能力评估工具显示出良好的心理测量特性,但对儿童能力评估的研究仍处于起步阶段。局限性包括缺乏诊断能力的黄金标准,以及将认知功能纳入标准化能力评估的不一致和最低限度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Standardised capacity measures and cognition in the assessment of capacity in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Standardised capacity measures and cognition in the assessment of capacity in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

While there is increasing use of standardised tools to assist in determining decision-making capacity in adults, there is limited literature evaluating these tools in children/adolescents. The current PRISMA guided systematic review aimed to evaluate standardised capacity assessment tools used in the child/adolescent population, and to examine the relationship between these capacity assessment tools and cognition. Inclusion criteria comprised: (1) validation of a new/existing tool to assess capacity or competence; (2) participants < 18 years; (3) involved validation on normative or non-normative populations; (4) published in English in a peer review journal. Ten studies were included. The majority applied a version of the Macarthur Competence Assessment Tool. Findings suggest capacity assessment tools demonstrate sound psychometric properties, but research into capacity assessment in children is still in its infancy. Limitations include the lack of diagnostic gold standard of capacity and the inconsistent and minimal incorporation of cognitive functioning into standardised capacity assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law is rapidly becoming a driving force behind the up-to-date examination of forensic issues in psychiatry and psychology. It is a fully refereed journal with outstanding academic and professional representation on its editorial board and is aimed at health, mental health and legal professionals. The journal aims to publish and disseminate information regarding research and development in forensic psychiatry, forensic psychology and areas of law and other disciplines in which psychiatry and psychology have a relevance. Features of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law include review articles; analyses of professional issues, controversies and developments; case studies; original empirical studies; book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信