比较新西兰一个未被理解的社区样本中点火和不点火的成年人的特征。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Psychiatry Psychology and Law Pub Date : 2024-09-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/13218719.2024.2346720
Kendal Johnston, Nichola Tyler
{"title":"比较新西兰一个未被理解的社区样本中点火和不点火的成年人的特征。","authors":"Kendal Johnston, Nichola Tyler","doi":"10.1080/13218719.2024.2346720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the prevalence of deliberate firesetting in an un-apprehended New Zealand sample and factors that differentiate firesetting and non-firesetting individuals. An anonymous online survey assessing demographic and background characteristics, history of firesetting and psychological characteristics was advertised on Facebook community groups and pinboards across New Zealand. A total of 626 adults completed the survey. One-hundred and three participants (16.45%) self-reported having deliberately set at least one fire over the age of 14 years. When controlling for all other variables in a logistic regression model, having a high-school qualification as the highest level of educational attainment (odds ratio, <i>OR</i> = 2.24), history of a mental health diagnosis (<i>OR</i> = 1.91), fearful attachment style (<i>OR</i> = 1.16) and fire interest (<i>OR</i> = 1.05) showed the strongest unique association with un-apprehended firesetting. Further research is needed to examine the full range of behavioural and psychological characteristics associated with un-apprehended firesetting.</p>","PeriodicalId":51553,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","volume":"32 5","pages":"700-721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the characteristics of firesetting and non-firesetting adults in a New Zealand un-apprehended community sample.\",\"authors\":\"Kendal Johnston, Nichola Tyler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13218719.2024.2346720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examines the prevalence of deliberate firesetting in an un-apprehended New Zealand sample and factors that differentiate firesetting and non-firesetting individuals. An anonymous online survey assessing demographic and background characteristics, history of firesetting and psychological characteristics was advertised on Facebook community groups and pinboards across New Zealand. A total of 626 adults completed the survey. One-hundred and three participants (16.45%) self-reported having deliberately set at least one fire over the age of 14 years. When controlling for all other variables in a logistic regression model, having a high-school qualification as the highest level of educational attainment (odds ratio, <i>OR</i> = 2.24), history of a mental health diagnosis (<i>OR</i> = 1.91), fearful attachment style (<i>OR</i> = 1.16) and fire interest (<i>OR</i> = 1.05) showed the strongest unique association with un-apprehended firesetting. Further research is needed to examine the full range of behavioural and psychological characteristics associated with un-apprehended firesetting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Psychology and Law\",\"volume\":\"32 5\",\"pages\":\"700-721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459187/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Psychology and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2346720\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2346720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了在一个未知的新西兰样本中故意纵火的流行程度,以及区分纵火和非纵火个体的因素。一项评估人口统计和背景特征、纵火史和心理特征的匿名在线调查在新西兰的Facebook社区群和钉板上做了广告。共有626名成年人完成了这项调查。103名参与者(16.45%)自我报告在14岁以上故意纵火至少一次。当在逻辑回归模型中控制所有其他变量时,拥有高中学历作为最高教育程度(优势比,OR = 2.24),心理健康诊断史(OR = 1.91),恐惧依恋类型(OR = 1.16)和火灾兴趣(OR = 1.05)显示出与不明原因纵火最强烈的独特关联。需要进一步的研究来检查与无意识纵火有关的行为和心理特征的全部范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing the characteristics of firesetting and non-firesetting adults in a New Zealand un-apprehended community sample.

Comparing the characteristics of firesetting and non-firesetting adults in a New Zealand un-apprehended community sample.

Comparing the characteristics of firesetting and non-firesetting adults in a New Zealand un-apprehended community sample.

Comparing the characteristics of firesetting and non-firesetting adults in a New Zealand un-apprehended community sample.

This study examines the prevalence of deliberate firesetting in an un-apprehended New Zealand sample and factors that differentiate firesetting and non-firesetting individuals. An anonymous online survey assessing demographic and background characteristics, history of firesetting and psychological characteristics was advertised on Facebook community groups and pinboards across New Zealand. A total of 626 adults completed the survey. One-hundred and three participants (16.45%) self-reported having deliberately set at least one fire over the age of 14 years. When controlling for all other variables in a logistic regression model, having a high-school qualification as the highest level of educational attainment (odds ratio, OR = 2.24), history of a mental health diagnosis (OR = 1.91), fearful attachment style (OR = 1.16) and fire interest (OR = 1.05) showed the strongest unique association with un-apprehended firesetting. Further research is needed to examine the full range of behavioural and psychological characteristics associated with un-apprehended firesetting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law is rapidly becoming a driving force behind the up-to-date examination of forensic issues in psychiatry and psychology. It is a fully refereed journal with outstanding academic and professional representation on its editorial board and is aimed at health, mental health and legal professionals. The journal aims to publish and disseminate information regarding research and development in forensic psychiatry, forensic psychology and areas of law and other disciplines in which psychiatry and psychology have a relevance. Features of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law include review articles; analyses of professional issues, controversies and developments; case studies; original empirical studies; book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信