前凸恢复:经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与腰骶关节处可扩展和静态固定器的比较。

IF 1.3 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Zuhair Mohammed, Sean Taylor, Saurabh Rawall, Francis Cruz, Addison Cimino, Luke Hiatt
{"title":"前凸恢复:经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与腰骶关节处可扩展和静态固定器的比较。","authors":"Zuhair Mohammed, Sean Taylor, Saurabh Rawall, Francis Cruz, Addison Cimino, Luke Hiatt","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_142_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>L5-S1 is a challenging level for achieving fusion, where traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) techniques may fail to maintain disc height and lordosis. Expandable cages, offering in situ expansion, may improve radiographic outcomes. Their use specifically at L5-S1 has not been previously studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥18 years who underwent TLIF at L5-S1 between January 2015 and September 2023. Patients were grouped by cage type (expandable vs. static). Radiographic data included anterior and posterior disc heights, disc angle, L5-S1, L4-S1, and L1-S1 sagittal lordotic angles, and lumbar distribution index. Measurements were recorded preoperatively and at two postoperative intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 patients were analyzed (15 expandable, 28 static). At baseline, the expandable group had greater posterior disc height (5.03 mm vs. 3.06 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001). At first follow-up, expandable cages showed higher anterior disc height (18.86 mm vs. 11.80 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001), posterior disc height (7.80 mm vs. 5.30 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and disc angle (16.27° vs. 11.82°, <i>P</i> = 0.040). From preoperative to final follow-up, expandable cages had greater gains in anterior disc height (9.22 mm vs. 3.27 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001), disc angle (7.84° vs. 0.24°, <i>P</i> = 0.002), and L5-S1 lordosis (7.03° vs. 0.81°, <i>P</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expandable TLIF cages at L5-S1 offer significantly improved radiographic correction over static cages, addressing key limitations of traditional posterior approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":"16 3","pages":"335-342"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lordotic restoration: A comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion expandable and static cages at the lumbosacral junction.\",\"authors\":\"Zuhair Mohammed, Sean Taylor, Saurabh Rawall, Francis Cruz, Addison Cimino, Luke Hiatt\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_142_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>L5-S1 is a challenging level for achieving fusion, where traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) techniques may fail to maintain disc height and lordosis. Expandable cages, offering in situ expansion, may improve radiographic outcomes. Their use specifically at L5-S1 has not been previously studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥18 years who underwent TLIF at L5-S1 between January 2015 and September 2023. Patients were grouped by cage type (expandable vs. static). Radiographic data included anterior and posterior disc heights, disc angle, L5-S1, L4-S1, and L1-S1 sagittal lordotic angles, and lumbar distribution index. Measurements were recorded preoperatively and at two postoperative intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 patients were analyzed (15 expandable, 28 static). At baseline, the expandable group had greater posterior disc height (5.03 mm vs. 3.06 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001). At first follow-up, expandable cages showed higher anterior disc height (18.86 mm vs. 11.80 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001), posterior disc height (7.80 mm vs. 5.30 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and disc angle (16.27° vs. 11.82°, <i>P</i> = 0.040). From preoperative to final follow-up, expandable cages had greater gains in anterior disc height (9.22 mm vs. 3.27 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001), disc angle (7.84° vs. 0.24°, <i>P</i> = 0.002), and L5-S1 lordosis (7.03° vs. 0.81°, <i>P</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Expandable TLIF cages at L5-S1 offer significantly improved radiographic correction over static cages, addressing key limitations of traditional posterior approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"335-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459935/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_142_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_142_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:L5-S1是实现融合的一个具有挑战性的水平,传统的经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合(tliff)技术可能无法保持椎间盘高度和前凸。可膨胀笼,提供原位膨胀,可改善放射成像结果。它们在L5-S1的具体作用以前没有研究过。方法:我们回顾性分析了2015年1月至2023年9月期间在L5-S1接受TLIF的≥18岁患者。患者按笼型(可伸缩vs静态)分组。影像学资料包括椎间盘前后高度、椎间盘角度、L5-S1、L4-S1和L1-S1矢状前凸角以及腰椎分布指数。术前和术后两次测量记录。结果:共分析43例患者(可扩展15例,静态28例)。在基线时,可伸缩组的后椎间盘高度更高(5.03 mm比3.06 mm, P < 0.001)。在第一次随访中,可扩展笼显示出更高的前盘高度(18.86 mm比11.80 mm, P < 0.001)、后盘高度(7.80 mm比5.30 mm, P < 0.001)和椎间盘角度(16.27°比11.82°,P = 0.040)。从术前到最后随访,可膨胀笼在前盘高度(9.22 mm vs. 3.27 mm, P < 0.001)、椎间盘角度(7.84°vs. 0.24°,P = 0.002)和L5-S1前凸(7.03°vs. 0.81°,P = 0.012)方面有较大的增加。结论:与静态固定架相比,L5-S1的可扩展TLIF固定架可显著改善影像学矫正,解决了传统后路入路的主要局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lordotic restoration: A comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion expandable and static cages at the lumbosacral junction.

Lordotic restoration: A comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion expandable and static cages at the lumbosacral junction.

Lordotic restoration: A comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion expandable and static cages at the lumbosacral junction.

Lordotic restoration: A comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion expandable and static cages at the lumbosacral junction.

Background: L5-S1 is a challenging level for achieving fusion, where traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) techniques may fail to maintain disc height and lordosis. Expandable cages, offering in situ expansion, may improve radiographic outcomes. Their use specifically at L5-S1 has not been previously studied.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients ≥18 years who underwent TLIF at L5-S1 between January 2015 and September 2023. Patients were grouped by cage type (expandable vs. static). Radiographic data included anterior and posterior disc heights, disc angle, L5-S1, L4-S1, and L1-S1 sagittal lordotic angles, and lumbar distribution index. Measurements were recorded preoperatively and at two postoperative intervals.

Results: A total of 43 patients were analyzed (15 expandable, 28 static). At baseline, the expandable group had greater posterior disc height (5.03 mm vs. 3.06 mm, P < 0.001). At first follow-up, expandable cages showed higher anterior disc height (18.86 mm vs. 11.80 mm, P < 0.001), posterior disc height (7.80 mm vs. 5.30 mm, P < 0.001), and disc angle (16.27° vs. 11.82°, P = 0.040). From preoperative to final follow-up, expandable cages had greater gains in anterior disc height (9.22 mm vs. 3.27 mm, P < 0.001), disc angle (7.84° vs. 0.24°, P = 0.002), and L5-S1 lordosis (7.03° vs. 0.81°, P = 0.012).

Conclusions: Expandable TLIF cages at L5-S1 offer significantly improved radiographic correction over static cages, addressing key limitations of traditional posterior approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信