颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术后椎笼位置、影像学参数和霍斯菲尔德单位对沉降率的影响。

IF 1.3 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jarod Olson, Jonathan F Dalton, Omar H Tarawneh, Rajkishen Narayanan, Alec Giakas, Rachel Huang, Joydeep Baidya, Robert J Oris, Joshua Mathew, William A Green, Nicholas B Pohl, Anthony LaBarbiera, Benjamin Crain, Nathaniel Pineda, Joseph Rajasekaran, Gordon Hua, Mark F Kurd, Jeffrey Rihn, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher Kepler, Gregory Schroeder
{"title":"颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术后椎笼位置、影像学参数和霍斯菲尔德单位对沉降率的影响。","authors":"Jarod Olson, Jonathan F Dalton, Omar H Tarawneh, Rajkishen Narayanan, Alec Giakas, Rachel Huang, Joydeep Baidya, Robert J Oris, Joshua Mathew, William A Green, Nicholas B Pohl, Anthony LaBarbiera, Benjamin Crain, Nathaniel Pineda, Joseph Rajasekaran, Gordon Hua, Mark F Kurd, Jeffrey Rihn, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher Kepler, Gregory Schroeder","doi":"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_119_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>The study design was a retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to validate the relationship between Hounsfield units (HU) and subsidence, including multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Cage/graft subsidence commonly occurs after ACDF. Prior work on 1-level ACDF found increased subsidence rates in patients with lower HUs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adults who underwent 1-3 level ACDF at a tertiary center and had preoperative computed tomography scans were included (2018-2022). HUs were assessed ~5 mm caudal to the superior endplate. Six-month postoperative radiographs were evaluated for cage/graft positioning, screw loosening, and subsidence. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) assessed the predictive value of segmental/minimum/maximum HU for screw loosening and/or subsidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients (82 levels) were included - demographics were similar among patients with versus without subsidence at any level. Average HU, segmental HU, segmental HU above and below 343.7 HU, minimum HU, and maximum HU were similar between patients with versus without subsidence at any level. Among the HU measurements, the maximum AUC was 0.554 (95% confidence interval 0.421-0.687) for screw loosening as predicted by minimum HU with a cutoff of 313 HU. Subsidence was more associated with middle positioning compared to anterior (28.0% vs. 10.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to prior literature, this study found no association and minimal predictive ability of segmental, minimum, or maximum HU values and subsidence or screw loosening after 1-3 level ACDF. Middle positioning was associated with cage/graft subsidence. This suggests that central positioning of the cage/graft is a risk factor for subsidence, potentially due to softer cancellous bone centrally.</p>","PeriodicalId":51721,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","volume":"16 3","pages":"349-355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of cage position, radiographic parameters, and hounsfield units on subsidence rate after one to three level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Jarod Olson, Jonathan F Dalton, Omar H Tarawneh, Rajkishen Narayanan, Alec Giakas, Rachel Huang, Joydeep Baidya, Robert J Oris, Joshua Mathew, William A Green, Nicholas B Pohl, Anthony LaBarbiera, Benjamin Crain, Nathaniel Pineda, Joseph Rajasekaran, Gordon Hua, Mark F Kurd, Jeffrey Rihn, Jose A Canseco, Alan S Hilibrand, Alexander R Vaccaro, Christopher Kepler, Gregory Schroeder\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_119_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>The study design was a retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to validate the relationship between Hounsfield units (HU) and subsidence, including multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Cage/graft subsidence commonly occurs after ACDF. Prior work on 1-level ACDF found increased subsidence rates in patients with lower HUs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Adults who underwent 1-3 level ACDF at a tertiary center and had preoperative computed tomography scans were included (2018-2022). HUs were assessed ~5 mm caudal to the superior endplate. Six-month postoperative radiographs were evaluated for cage/graft positioning, screw loosening, and subsidence. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) assessed the predictive value of segmental/minimum/maximum HU for screw loosening and/or subsidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients (82 levels) were included - demographics were similar among patients with versus without subsidence at any level. Average HU, segmental HU, segmental HU above and below 343.7 HU, minimum HU, and maximum HU were similar between patients with versus without subsidence at any level. Among the HU measurements, the maximum AUC was 0.554 (95% confidence interval 0.421-0.687) for screw loosening as predicted by minimum HU with a cutoff of 313 HU. Subsidence was more associated with middle positioning compared to anterior (28.0% vs. 10.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to prior literature, this study found no association and minimal predictive ability of segmental, minimum, or maximum HU values and subsidence or screw loosening after 1-3 level ACDF. Middle positioning was associated with cage/graft subsidence. This suggests that central positioning of the cage/graft is a risk factor for subsidence, potentially due to softer cancellous bone centrally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"349-355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12459941/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_119_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_119_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:研究设计为回顾性队列。目的:本研究的目的是验证Hounsfield单位(HU)与沉降之间的关系,包括多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)。保持架/接枝沉降通常发生在ACDF之后。先前对一级ACDF的研究发现,低溶血性尿毒患者的沉降率增加。材料和方法:纳入在三级中心接受1-3级ACDF并进行术前计算机断层扫描的成年人(2018-2022)。hu在上终板尾部约5mm处进行评估。术后6个月的x线片评估笼/移植物定位、螺钉松动和下沉情况。接收器工作特性曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)评估了分段/最小/最大HU对螺钉松动和/或下沉的预测价值。结果:纳入42例患者(82个水平)-任何水平的沉陷患者与无沉陷患者的人口统计学相似。平均HU、节段HU、节段HU高于和低于343.7 HU、最小HU和最大HU在任何程度的沉陷患者与无沉陷患者之间相似。在HU测量中,螺钉松动的最大AUC为0.554(95%可信区间0.421-0.687),与最小HU预测的截止值为313 HU一致。与前位相比,中位与下沉的相关性更大(28.0%比10.5%,P = 0.046)。结论:与先前的文献相反,本研究发现节段性、最小或最大HU值与1-3级ACDF后的下沉或螺钉松动没有关联,预测能力也很低。中间定位与笼/接枝沉降有关。这表明,固定架/移植物的中心位置是下沉的一个危险因素,可能是由于中心松质骨较软。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of cage position, radiographic parameters, and hounsfield units on subsidence rate after one to three level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Study design: The study design was a retrospective cohort.

Objective: The objective of the study was to validate the relationship between Hounsfield units (HU) and subsidence, including multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Cage/graft subsidence commonly occurs after ACDF. Prior work on 1-level ACDF found increased subsidence rates in patients with lower HUs.

Materials and methods: Adults who underwent 1-3 level ACDF at a tertiary center and had preoperative computed tomography scans were included (2018-2022). HUs were assessed ~5 mm caudal to the superior endplate. Six-month postoperative radiographs were evaluated for cage/graft positioning, screw loosening, and subsidence. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC) assessed the predictive value of segmental/minimum/maximum HU for screw loosening and/or subsidence.

Results: Forty-two patients (82 levels) were included - demographics were similar among patients with versus without subsidence at any level. Average HU, segmental HU, segmental HU above and below 343.7 HU, minimum HU, and maximum HU were similar between patients with versus without subsidence at any level. Among the HU measurements, the maximum AUC was 0.554 (95% confidence interval 0.421-0.687) for screw loosening as predicted by minimum HU with a cutoff of 313 HU. Subsidence was more associated with middle positioning compared to anterior (28.0% vs. 10.5%, P = 0.046).

Conclusions: Contrary to prior literature, this study found no association and minimal predictive ability of segmental, minimum, or maximum HU values and subsidence or screw loosening after 1-3 level ACDF. Middle positioning was associated with cage/graft subsidence. This suggests that central positioning of the cage/graft is a risk factor for subsidence, potentially due to softer cancellous bone centrally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信