Michael Dworsky, Leslie I Boden, Elizabeth C Chase, Yvette C Cozier, Sarah Edgington, Marc N Elliott, Seth A Seabury
{"title":"职业健康中的种族和民族差异。","authors":"Michael Dworsky, Leslie I Boden, Elizabeth C Chase, Yvette C Cozier, Sarah Edgington, Marc N Elliott, Seth A Seabury","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Occupational health disparities affect the safety and well-being of workers across different racial and ethnic groups. Understanding these disparities is crucial for developing targeted interventions, but evidence on occupational injury rates by race and ethnicity has been scarce due to data limitations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries among major racial and ethnic groups in California and to assess the contributions of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities to these differences.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A cross-sectional study analyzing 15 years (2005-2019) of California workers' compensation data was carried out. The study examined injury rates across 4 racial and ethnic groups: Asian/Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic), Black (non-Hispanic), Hispanic, and White (non-Hispanic). California residents employed in the private sector or state and local government, encompassing diverse industries and occupations, between 2005 and 2019 were included. Analysis was conducted between May 2024 and May 2025.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The study analyzed existing workers' compensation data without specific interventions.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries, with comparisons made between racial and ethnic groups. The analysis focused on the role of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities in explaining injury rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 2.6 million lost-time injuries among California workers (mean [SD] age, 42 [11]; 63% male). The overall injury rate was 1.32 lost-time injuries per 100 full-time equivalent workers (FTE). Lost-time injury rates were higher for Black (1.74 cases per 100 FTE) and Hispanic workers (1.90 cases per 100 FTE) than for White workers (1.00 cases per 100 FTE), whereas rates were lower for Asian/Pacific Islander workers (0.63 cases per 100 FTE). Black and Hispanic workers experienced injury rates that were 74% and 90% higher, respectively, compared with White workers, whereas Asian/Pacific Islander workers had injury rates that were 37% lower. Occupational concentration accounted for 53% of the disparity between Black and White workers and 71% of the disparity between Hispanic and White workers. Notably, 56% of the excess risk of injuries for Black women was attributed to within-occupation disparities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Disparities in workplace safety are a significant contributor to racial and ethnic health disparities. Addressing both occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities is essential for improving workplace safety and reducing health inequities among workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 9","pages":"e253495"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Occupational Health.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Dworsky, Leslie I Boden, Elizabeth C Chase, Yvette C Cozier, Sarah Edgington, Marc N Elliott, Seth A Seabury\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Occupational health disparities affect the safety and well-being of workers across different racial and ethnic groups. Understanding these disparities is crucial for developing targeted interventions, but evidence on occupational injury rates by race and ethnicity has been scarce due to data limitations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries among major racial and ethnic groups in California and to assess the contributions of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities to these differences.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A cross-sectional study analyzing 15 years (2005-2019) of California workers' compensation data was carried out. The study examined injury rates across 4 racial and ethnic groups: Asian/Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic), Black (non-Hispanic), Hispanic, and White (non-Hispanic). California residents employed in the private sector or state and local government, encompassing diverse industries and occupations, between 2005 and 2019 were included. Analysis was conducted between May 2024 and May 2025.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The study analyzed existing workers' compensation data without specific interventions.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries, with comparisons made between racial and ethnic groups. The analysis focused on the role of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities in explaining injury rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 2.6 million lost-time injuries among California workers (mean [SD] age, 42 [11]; 63% male). The overall injury rate was 1.32 lost-time injuries per 100 full-time equivalent workers (FTE). Lost-time injury rates were higher for Black (1.74 cases per 100 FTE) and Hispanic workers (1.90 cases per 100 FTE) than for White workers (1.00 cases per 100 FTE), whereas rates were lower for Asian/Pacific Islander workers (0.63 cases per 100 FTE). Black and Hispanic workers experienced injury rates that were 74% and 90% higher, respectively, compared with White workers, whereas Asian/Pacific Islander workers had injury rates that were 37% lower. Occupational concentration accounted for 53% of the disparity between Black and White workers and 71% of the disparity between Hispanic and White workers. Notably, 56% of the excess risk of injuries for Black women was attributed to within-occupation disparities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Disparities in workplace safety are a significant contributor to racial and ethnic health disparities. Addressing both occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities is essential for improving workplace safety and reducing health inequities among workers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 9\",\"pages\":\"e253495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475949/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Occupational Health.
Importance: Occupational health disparities affect the safety and well-being of workers across different racial and ethnic groups. Understanding these disparities is crucial for developing targeted interventions, but evidence on occupational injury rates by race and ethnicity has been scarce due to data limitations.
Objective: To determine the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries among major racial and ethnic groups in California and to assess the contributions of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities to these differences.
Design, setting, and participants: A cross-sectional study analyzing 15 years (2005-2019) of California workers' compensation data was carried out. The study examined injury rates across 4 racial and ethnic groups: Asian/Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic), Black (non-Hispanic), Hispanic, and White (non-Hispanic). California residents employed in the private sector or state and local government, encompassing diverse industries and occupations, between 2005 and 2019 were included. Analysis was conducted between May 2024 and May 2025.
Intervention: The study analyzed existing workers' compensation data without specific interventions.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries, with comparisons made between racial and ethnic groups. The analysis focused on the role of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities in explaining injury rates.
Results: The analysis included 2.6 million lost-time injuries among California workers (mean [SD] age, 42 [11]; 63% male). The overall injury rate was 1.32 lost-time injuries per 100 full-time equivalent workers (FTE). Lost-time injury rates were higher for Black (1.74 cases per 100 FTE) and Hispanic workers (1.90 cases per 100 FTE) than for White workers (1.00 cases per 100 FTE), whereas rates were lower for Asian/Pacific Islander workers (0.63 cases per 100 FTE). Black and Hispanic workers experienced injury rates that were 74% and 90% higher, respectively, compared with White workers, whereas Asian/Pacific Islander workers had injury rates that were 37% lower. Occupational concentration accounted for 53% of the disparity between Black and White workers and 71% of the disparity between Hispanic and White workers. Notably, 56% of the excess risk of injuries for Black women was attributed to within-occupation disparities.
Conclusions and relevance: Disparities in workplace safety are a significant contributor to racial and ethnic health disparities. Addressing both occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities is essential for improving workplace safety and reducing health inequities among workers.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform.
In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations.
JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.