职业健康中的种族和民族差异。

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Michael Dworsky, Leslie I Boden, Elizabeth C Chase, Yvette C Cozier, Sarah Edgington, Marc N Elliott, Seth A Seabury
{"title":"职业健康中的种族和民族差异。","authors":"Michael Dworsky, Leslie I Boden, Elizabeth C Chase, Yvette C Cozier, Sarah Edgington, Marc N Elliott, Seth A Seabury","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Occupational health disparities affect the safety and well-being of workers across different racial and ethnic groups. Understanding these disparities is crucial for developing targeted interventions, but evidence on occupational injury rates by race and ethnicity has been scarce due to data limitations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries among major racial and ethnic groups in California and to assess the contributions of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities to these differences.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A cross-sectional study analyzing 15 years (2005-2019) of California workers' compensation data was carried out. The study examined injury rates across 4 racial and ethnic groups: Asian/Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic), Black (non-Hispanic), Hispanic, and White (non-Hispanic). California residents employed in the private sector or state and local government, encompassing diverse industries and occupations, between 2005 and 2019 were included. Analysis was conducted between May 2024 and May 2025.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The study analyzed existing workers' compensation data without specific interventions.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries, with comparisons made between racial and ethnic groups. The analysis focused on the role of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities in explaining injury rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 2.6 million lost-time injuries among California workers (mean [SD] age, 42 [11]; 63% male). The overall injury rate was 1.32 lost-time injuries per 100 full-time equivalent workers (FTE). Lost-time injury rates were higher for Black (1.74 cases per 100 FTE) and Hispanic workers (1.90 cases per 100 FTE) than for White workers (1.00 cases per 100 FTE), whereas rates were lower for Asian/Pacific Islander workers (0.63 cases per 100 FTE). Black and Hispanic workers experienced injury rates that were 74% and 90% higher, respectively, compared with White workers, whereas Asian/Pacific Islander workers had injury rates that were 37% lower. Occupational concentration accounted for 53% of the disparity between Black and White workers and 71% of the disparity between Hispanic and White workers. Notably, 56% of the excess risk of injuries for Black women was attributed to within-occupation disparities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Disparities in workplace safety are a significant contributor to racial and ethnic health disparities. Addressing both occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities is essential for improving workplace safety and reducing health inequities among workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 9","pages":"e253495"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Occupational Health.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Dworsky, Leslie I Boden, Elizabeth C Chase, Yvette C Cozier, Sarah Edgington, Marc N Elliott, Seth A Seabury\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Occupational health disparities affect the safety and well-being of workers across different racial and ethnic groups. Understanding these disparities is crucial for developing targeted interventions, but evidence on occupational injury rates by race and ethnicity has been scarce due to data limitations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries among major racial and ethnic groups in California and to assess the contributions of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities to these differences.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A cross-sectional study analyzing 15 years (2005-2019) of California workers' compensation data was carried out. The study examined injury rates across 4 racial and ethnic groups: Asian/Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic), Black (non-Hispanic), Hispanic, and White (non-Hispanic). California residents employed in the private sector or state and local government, encompassing diverse industries and occupations, between 2005 and 2019 were included. Analysis was conducted between May 2024 and May 2025.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The study analyzed existing workers' compensation data without specific interventions.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries, with comparisons made between racial and ethnic groups. The analysis focused on the role of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities in explaining injury rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 2.6 million lost-time injuries among California workers (mean [SD] age, 42 [11]; 63% male). The overall injury rate was 1.32 lost-time injuries per 100 full-time equivalent workers (FTE). Lost-time injury rates were higher for Black (1.74 cases per 100 FTE) and Hispanic workers (1.90 cases per 100 FTE) than for White workers (1.00 cases per 100 FTE), whereas rates were lower for Asian/Pacific Islander workers (0.63 cases per 100 FTE). Black and Hispanic workers experienced injury rates that were 74% and 90% higher, respectively, compared with White workers, whereas Asian/Pacific Islander workers had injury rates that were 37% lower. Occupational concentration accounted for 53% of the disparity between Black and White workers and 71% of the disparity between Hispanic and White workers. Notably, 56% of the excess risk of injuries for Black women was attributed to within-occupation disparities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Disparities in workplace safety are a significant contributor to racial and ethnic health disparities. Addressing both occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities is essential for improving workplace safety and reducing health inequities among workers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 9\",\"pages\":\"e253495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12475949/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.3495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:职业健康差异影响不同种族和族裔群体工人的安全和福祉。了解这些差异对于制定有针对性的干预措施至关重要,但由于数据限制,关于种族和民族职业伤害率的证据很少。目的:确定加州主要种族和族裔群体中失时工伤的发生率,并评估职业集中度和职业内差异对这些差异的贡献。设计、设置和参与者:对加州15年(2005-2019年)的工人薪酬数据进行了横断面研究。该研究调查了4个种族和族裔群体的受伤率:亚洲/太平洋岛民(非西班牙裔)、黑人(非西班牙裔)、西班牙裔和白人(非西班牙裔)。包括2005年至2019年期间在私营部门或州和地方政府就业的加州居民,涵盖不同的行业和职业。分析时间为2024年5月至2025年5月。干预:本研究在没有具体干预的情况下分析了现有的工人薪酬数据。主要结果和措施:主要结果是工作场所失时伤害的发生率,并进行了种族和民族群体之间的比较。分析的重点是职业集中度和职业内差异在解释伤害率方面的作用。结果:分析包括260万加州工人的误工伤害(平均年龄42岁,63%为男性)。总体伤害率为每100名全职等效工人(FTE) 1.32次失时伤害。黑人(1.74例/ 100 FTE)和西班牙裔工人(1.90例/ 100 FTE)的失时工伤率高于白人工人(1.00例/ 100 FTE),而亚洲/太平洋岛民工人的失时工伤率较低(0.63例/ 100 FTE)。与白人工人相比,黑人和西班牙裔工人的受伤率分别高出74%和90%,而亚洲/太平洋岛民工人的受伤率则低37%。职业集中度在黑人和白人工人之间的差异中占53%,在西班牙裔和白人工人之间的差异中占71%。值得注意的是,黑人女性受伤的额外风险中有56%归因于职业内部的差异。结论和相关性:工作场所安全方面的差异是造成种族和族裔健康差异的重要因素。解决职业集中和职业内部差异对于改善工作场所安全和减少工人之间的健康不平等至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Occupational Health.

Importance: Occupational health disparities affect the safety and well-being of workers across different racial and ethnic groups. Understanding these disparities is crucial for developing targeted interventions, but evidence on occupational injury rates by race and ethnicity has been scarce due to data limitations.

Objective: To determine the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries among major racial and ethnic groups in California and to assess the contributions of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities to these differences.

Design, setting, and participants: A cross-sectional study analyzing 15 years (2005-2019) of California workers' compensation data was carried out. The study examined injury rates across 4 racial and ethnic groups: Asian/Pacific Islander (non-Hispanic), Black (non-Hispanic), Hispanic, and White (non-Hispanic). California residents employed in the private sector or state and local government, encompassing diverse industries and occupations, between 2005 and 2019 were included. Analysis was conducted between May 2024 and May 2025.

Intervention: The study analyzed existing workers' compensation data without specific interventions.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of lost-time workplace injuries, with comparisons made between racial and ethnic groups. The analysis focused on the role of occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities in explaining injury rates.

Results: The analysis included 2.6 million lost-time injuries among California workers (mean [SD] age, 42 [11]; 63% male). The overall injury rate was 1.32 lost-time injuries per 100 full-time equivalent workers (FTE). Lost-time injury rates were higher for Black (1.74 cases per 100 FTE) and Hispanic workers (1.90 cases per 100 FTE) than for White workers (1.00 cases per 100 FTE), whereas rates were lower for Asian/Pacific Islander workers (0.63 cases per 100 FTE). Black and Hispanic workers experienced injury rates that were 74% and 90% higher, respectively, compared with White workers, whereas Asian/Pacific Islander workers had injury rates that were 37% lower. Occupational concentration accounted for 53% of the disparity between Black and White workers and 71% of the disparity between Hispanic and White workers. Notably, 56% of the excess risk of injuries for Black women was attributed to within-occupation disparities.

Conclusions and relevance: Disparities in workplace safety are a significant contributor to racial and ethnic health disparities. Addressing both occupational concentration and within-occupation disparities is essential for improving workplace safety and reducing health inequities among workers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信