55岁及以上多发性硬化症患者疾病改善疗法的实际应用

IF 2.4 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2025-09-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2025-001108
Mina Stanikić, Anke Salmen, Christian P Kamm, Patrick Roth, Pasquale Calabrese, Chiara Zecca, Claudio Gobbi, Claudia Baum, Benjamin Victor Ineichen, Viktor von Wyl
{"title":"55岁及以上多发性硬化症患者疾病改善疗法的实际应用","authors":"Mina Stanikić, Anke Salmen, Christian P Kamm, Patrick Roth, Pasquale Calabrese, Chiara Zecca, Claudio Gobbi, Claudia Baum, Benjamin Victor Ineichen, Viktor von Wyl","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2025-001108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the average age of multiple sclerosis (MS) population rises globally, unclear guidelines on disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use in older persons with MS (pwMS) contribute to increased variability in clinical practice. The factors driving DMT utilisation in this population are not well understood. We explored DMT utilisation patterns in pwMS aged 55 and older enrolled in the Swiss MS Registry (SMSR), a nationwide observational study with voluntary participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an exploratory analysis using data from SMSR participants who had reported DMT status in the most recent follow-up survey and at least once within the previous 3 years. Participants were categorised and compared by current and past DMT use: <i>No DMT</i> (no use), <i>Stopped</i> (prior use), <i>Continued</i> (same DMT), <i>Switcher</i> (changed DMT) and <i>New</i> (initiated DMT). Log-binomial regression identified factors associated with non-use, grouping participants as No DMT (<i>No DMT</i>, <i>Stopped</i>) and DMT (<i>Continued, Switcher, New</i>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 378 participants (mean age 63.2±6.7 years), 206 (54.5%) reported DMT use: 176 (46.6%) continued the same DMT, 20 (5.3%) switched and 10 (2.6%) newly initiated DMT. Among non-users, 54 (14.3%) had stopped treatment, while the rest did not use DMT during the study period. In participants with regular neurological care, longer MS duration (relative risk (RR)=1.018, 95% CI 1.008 to 1.028) and older age (RR=1.016, 95% CI: 1.001 to 1.032) were associated with higher likelihood of DMT non-use, and participants with primary (RR=1.736, 95% CI: 1.175 to 2.565) and secondary progressive MS (RR=1.423, 95% CI: 1.023 to 1.981) were more likely not to use DMTs compared with relapsing-remitting MS. No significant associations were observed in participants without regular neurological follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite unclear efficacy and safety, many older pwMS continue DMT use. Use is primarily associated with relapsing-remitting MS, while age and disease duration show only modest or no association.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"7 2","pages":"e001108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world use of disease-modifying therapy in persons with multiple sclerosis aged 55 and over.\",\"authors\":\"Mina Stanikić, Anke Salmen, Christian P Kamm, Patrick Roth, Pasquale Calabrese, Chiara Zecca, Claudio Gobbi, Claudia Baum, Benjamin Victor Ineichen, Viktor von Wyl\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjno-2025-001108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the average age of multiple sclerosis (MS) population rises globally, unclear guidelines on disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use in older persons with MS (pwMS) contribute to increased variability in clinical practice. The factors driving DMT utilisation in this population are not well understood. We explored DMT utilisation patterns in pwMS aged 55 and older enrolled in the Swiss MS Registry (SMSR), a nationwide observational study with voluntary participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an exploratory analysis using data from SMSR participants who had reported DMT status in the most recent follow-up survey and at least once within the previous 3 years. Participants were categorised and compared by current and past DMT use: <i>No DMT</i> (no use), <i>Stopped</i> (prior use), <i>Continued</i> (same DMT), <i>Switcher</i> (changed DMT) and <i>New</i> (initiated DMT). Log-binomial regression identified factors associated with non-use, grouping participants as No DMT (<i>No DMT</i>, <i>Stopped</i>) and DMT (<i>Continued, Switcher, New</i>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 378 participants (mean age 63.2±6.7 years), 206 (54.5%) reported DMT use: 176 (46.6%) continued the same DMT, 20 (5.3%) switched and 10 (2.6%) newly initiated DMT. Among non-users, 54 (14.3%) had stopped treatment, while the rest did not use DMT during the study period. In participants with regular neurological care, longer MS duration (relative risk (RR)=1.018, 95% CI 1.008 to 1.028) and older age (RR=1.016, 95% CI: 1.001 to 1.032) were associated with higher likelihood of DMT non-use, and participants with primary (RR=1.736, 95% CI: 1.175 to 2.565) and secondary progressive MS (RR=1.423, 95% CI: 1.023 to 1.981) were more likely not to use DMTs compared with relapsing-remitting MS. No significant associations were observed in participants without regular neurological follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite unclear efficacy and safety, many older pwMS continue DMT use. Use is primarily associated with relapsing-remitting MS, while age and disease duration show only modest or no association.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Neurology Open\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"e001108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458763/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Neurology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2025-001108\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2025-001108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着全球多发性硬化症(MS)人口平均年龄的上升,在老年MS患者(pwMS)中使用疾病改善治疗(DMT)的指南不明确,导致临床实践中的变异性增加。在这一人群中驱动DMT使用的因素尚不清楚。我们探讨了瑞士多发性硬化症登记处(SMSR)登记的55岁及以上的pwMS的DMT使用模式,这是一项自愿参与的全国性观察性研究。方法:我们使用在最近的随访调查中报告DMT状态的SMSR参与者的数据进行了探索性分析,并且在过去3年内至少报告过一次。参与者根据当前和过去的DMT使用情况进行分类和比较:没有DMT(没有使用),停止(以前使用),继续(相同的DMT),切换者(改变DMT)和新(开始DMT)。对数二项回归确定了与不使用相关的因素,将参与者分组为No DMT (No DMT, Stopped)和DMT (continue, Switcher, New)。结果:在378名参与者(平均年龄63.2±6.7岁)中,206名(54.5%)报告使用DMT, 176名(46.6%)继续使用DMT, 20名(5.3%)转换,10名(2.6%)新开始使用DMT。在非使用者中,54人(14.3%)停止了治疗,而其余的人在研究期间没有使用DMT。在接受常规神经系统护理的参与者中,MS持续时间越长(相对风险(RR)=1.018, 95% CI 1.008至1.028)和年龄越大(RR=1.016, 95% CI: 1.001至1.032)与不使用DMT的可能性较高相关,原发性MS (RR=1.736, 95% CI: 1.175至2.565)和继发性进展性MS (RR=1.423, 95% CI:(1.023 - 1.981)与复发缓解型ms相比,不使用dmt的可能性更大。在没有定期神经学随访的参与者中,没有观察到显著的关联。结论:尽管疗效和安全性尚不清楚,许多老年pwMS仍继续使用DMT。用药主要与复发缓解型MS相关,而年龄和病程仅显示适度关联或无关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world use of disease-modifying therapy in persons with multiple sclerosis aged 55 and over.

Background: As the average age of multiple sclerosis (MS) population rises globally, unclear guidelines on disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use in older persons with MS (pwMS) contribute to increased variability in clinical practice. The factors driving DMT utilisation in this population are not well understood. We explored DMT utilisation patterns in pwMS aged 55 and older enrolled in the Swiss MS Registry (SMSR), a nationwide observational study with voluntary participation.

Methods: We conducted an exploratory analysis using data from SMSR participants who had reported DMT status in the most recent follow-up survey and at least once within the previous 3 years. Participants were categorised and compared by current and past DMT use: No DMT (no use), Stopped (prior use), Continued (same DMT), Switcher (changed DMT) and New (initiated DMT). Log-binomial regression identified factors associated with non-use, grouping participants as No DMT (No DMT, Stopped) and DMT (Continued, Switcher, New).

Results: Among 378 participants (mean age 63.2±6.7 years), 206 (54.5%) reported DMT use: 176 (46.6%) continued the same DMT, 20 (5.3%) switched and 10 (2.6%) newly initiated DMT. Among non-users, 54 (14.3%) had stopped treatment, while the rest did not use DMT during the study period. In participants with regular neurological care, longer MS duration (relative risk (RR)=1.018, 95% CI 1.008 to 1.028) and older age (RR=1.016, 95% CI: 1.001 to 1.032) were associated with higher likelihood of DMT non-use, and participants with primary (RR=1.736, 95% CI: 1.175 to 2.565) and secondary progressive MS (RR=1.423, 95% CI: 1.023 to 1.981) were more likely not to use DMTs compared with relapsing-remitting MS. No significant associations were observed in participants without regular neurological follow-up.

Conclusions: Despite unclear efficacy and safety, many older pwMS continue DMT use. Use is primarily associated with relapsing-remitting MS, while age and disease duration show only modest or no association.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信