Eileen Koski, Amar Das, Pei-Yun Sabrina Hsueh, Anthony Solomonides, Amanda L Joseph, Gyana Srivastava, Carl Erwin Johnson, Joseph Kannry, Bilikis Oladimeji, Amy Price, Steven Labkoff, Gnana Bharathy, Baihan Lin, Douglas Fridsma, Lee A Fleisher, Monica Lopez-Gonzalez, Reva Singh, Mark G Weiner, Robert Stolper, Russell Baris, Suzanne Sincavage, Tristan Naumann, Tayler Williams, Tien Thi Thuy Bui, Yuri Quintana
{"title":"在医疗保健领域实现负责任的人工智能——真实地对待现实世界的数据和证据。","authors":"Eileen Koski, Amar Das, Pei-Yun Sabrina Hsueh, Anthony Solomonides, Amanda L Joseph, Gyana Srivastava, Carl Erwin Johnson, Joseph Kannry, Bilikis Oladimeji, Amy Price, Steven Labkoff, Gnana Bharathy, Baihan Lin, Douglas Fridsma, Lee A Fleisher, Monica Lopez-Gonzalez, Reva Singh, Mark G Weiner, Robert Stolper, Russell Baris, Suzanne Sincavage, Tristan Naumann, Tayler Williams, Tien Thi Thuy Bui, Yuri Quintana","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of real-world data (RWD) in artificial intelligence (AI) applications for healthcare offers unique opportunities but also poses complex challenges related to interpretability, transparency, safety, efficacy, bias, equity, privacy, ethics, accountability, and stakeholder engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-stakeholder expert panel comprising healthcare professionals, AI developers, policymakers, and other stakeholders was assembled. Their task was to identify critical issues and formulate consensus recommendations, focusing on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI. The panel's work involved an in-person conference and workshop and extensive deliberations over several months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel's findings revealed several critical challenges, including the necessity for data literacy and documentation, the identification and mitigation of bias, privacy and ethics considerations, and the absence of an accountability structure for stakeholder management. To address these, the panel proposed a series of recommendations, such as the adoption of metadata standards for RWD sources, the development of transparency frameworks and instructional labels likened to \"nutrition labels\" for AI applications, the provision of cross-disciplinary training materials, the implementation of bias detection and mitigation strategies, and the establishment of ongoing monitoring and update processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Guidelines and resources focused on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI are essential for developing safe, effective, equitable, and trustworthy applications. The proposed recommendations provide a foundation for a comprehensive framework addressing the entire lifecycle of healthcare AI, emphasizing the importance of documentation, training, transparency, accountability, and multi-stakeholder engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards responsible artificial intelligence in healthcare-getting real about real-world data and evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Eileen Koski, Amar Das, Pei-Yun Sabrina Hsueh, Anthony Solomonides, Amanda L Joseph, Gyana Srivastava, Carl Erwin Johnson, Joseph Kannry, Bilikis Oladimeji, Amy Price, Steven Labkoff, Gnana Bharathy, Baihan Lin, Douglas Fridsma, Lee A Fleisher, Monica Lopez-Gonzalez, Reva Singh, Mark G Weiner, Robert Stolper, Russell Baris, Suzanne Sincavage, Tristan Naumann, Tayler Williams, Tien Thi Thuy Bui, Yuri Quintana\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocaf133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of real-world data (RWD) in artificial intelligence (AI) applications for healthcare offers unique opportunities but also poses complex challenges related to interpretability, transparency, safety, efficacy, bias, equity, privacy, ethics, accountability, and stakeholder engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-stakeholder expert panel comprising healthcare professionals, AI developers, policymakers, and other stakeholders was assembled. Their task was to identify critical issues and formulate consensus recommendations, focusing on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI. The panel's work involved an in-person conference and workshop and extensive deliberations over several months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel's findings revealed several critical challenges, including the necessity for data literacy and documentation, the identification and mitigation of bias, privacy and ethics considerations, and the absence of an accountability structure for stakeholder management. To address these, the panel proposed a series of recommendations, such as the adoption of metadata standards for RWD sources, the development of transparency frameworks and instructional labels likened to \\\"nutrition labels\\\" for AI applications, the provision of cross-disciplinary training materials, the implementation of bias detection and mitigation strategies, and the establishment of ongoing monitoring and update processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Guidelines and resources focused on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI are essential for developing safe, effective, equitable, and trustworthy applications. The proposed recommendations provide a foundation for a comprehensive framework addressing the entire lifecycle of healthcare AI, emphasizing the importance of documentation, training, transparency, accountability, and multi-stakeholder engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf133\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf133","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Towards responsible artificial intelligence in healthcare-getting real about real-world data and evidence.
Background: The use of real-world data (RWD) in artificial intelligence (AI) applications for healthcare offers unique opportunities but also poses complex challenges related to interpretability, transparency, safety, efficacy, bias, equity, privacy, ethics, accountability, and stakeholder engagement.
Methods: A multi-stakeholder expert panel comprising healthcare professionals, AI developers, policymakers, and other stakeholders was assembled. Their task was to identify critical issues and formulate consensus recommendations, focusing on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI. The panel's work involved an in-person conference and workshop and extensive deliberations over several months.
Results: The panel's findings revealed several critical challenges, including the necessity for data literacy and documentation, the identification and mitigation of bias, privacy and ethics considerations, and the absence of an accountability structure for stakeholder management. To address these, the panel proposed a series of recommendations, such as the adoption of metadata standards for RWD sources, the development of transparency frameworks and instructional labels likened to "nutrition labels" for AI applications, the provision of cross-disciplinary training materials, the implementation of bias detection and mitigation strategies, and the establishment of ongoing monitoring and update processes.
Conclusion: Guidelines and resources focused on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI are essential for developing safe, effective, equitable, and trustworthy applications. The proposed recommendations provide a foundation for a comprehensive framework addressing the entire lifecycle of healthcare AI, emphasizing the importance of documentation, training, transparency, accountability, and multi-stakeholder engagement.
期刊介绍:
JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.