在医疗保健领域实现负责任的人工智能——真实地对待现实世界的数据和证据。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Eileen Koski, Amar Das, Pei-Yun Sabrina Hsueh, Anthony Solomonides, Amanda L Joseph, Gyana Srivastava, Carl Erwin Johnson, Joseph Kannry, Bilikis Oladimeji, Amy Price, Steven Labkoff, Gnana Bharathy, Baihan Lin, Douglas Fridsma, Lee A Fleisher, Monica Lopez-Gonzalez, Reva Singh, Mark G Weiner, Robert Stolper, Russell Baris, Suzanne Sincavage, Tristan Naumann, Tayler Williams, Tien Thi Thuy Bui, Yuri Quintana
{"title":"在医疗保健领域实现负责任的人工智能——真实地对待现实世界的数据和证据。","authors":"Eileen Koski, Amar Das, Pei-Yun Sabrina Hsueh, Anthony Solomonides, Amanda L Joseph, Gyana Srivastava, Carl Erwin Johnson, Joseph Kannry, Bilikis Oladimeji, Amy Price, Steven Labkoff, Gnana Bharathy, Baihan Lin, Douglas Fridsma, Lee A Fleisher, Monica Lopez-Gonzalez, Reva Singh, Mark G Weiner, Robert Stolper, Russell Baris, Suzanne Sincavage, Tristan Naumann, Tayler Williams, Tien Thi Thuy Bui, Yuri Quintana","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of real-world data (RWD) in artificial intelligence (AI) applications for healthcare offers unique opportunities but also poses complex challenges related to interpretability, transparency, safety, efficacy, bias, equity, privacy, ethics, accountability, and stakeholder engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-stakeholder expert panel comprising healthcare professionals, AI developers, policymakers, and other stakeholders was assembled. Their task was to identify critical issues and formulate consensus recommendations, focusing on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI. The panel's work involved an in-person conference and workshop and extensive deliberations over several months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel's findings revealed several critical challenges, including the necessity for data literacy and documentation, the identification and mitigation of bias, privacy and ethics considerations, and the absence of an accountability structure for stakeholder management. To address these, the panel proposed a series of recommendations, such as the adoption of metadata standards for RWD sources, the development of transparency frameworks and instructional labels likened to \"nutrition labels\" for AI applications, the provision of cross-disciplinary training materials, the implementation of bias detection and mitigation strategies, and the establishment of ongoing monitoring and update processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Guidelines and resources focused on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI are essential for developing safe, effective, equitable, and trustworthy applications. The proposed recommendations provide a foundation for a comprehensive framework addressing the entire lifecycle of healthcare AI, emphasizing the importance of documentation, training, transparency, accountability, and multi-stakeholder engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards responsible artificial intelligence in healthcare-getting real about real-world data and evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Eileen Koski, Amar Das, Pei-Yun Sabrina Hsueh, Anthony Solomonides, Amanda L Joseph, Gyana Srivastava, Carl Erwin Johnson, Joseph Kannry, Bilikis Oladimeji, Amy Price, Steven Labkoff, Gnana Bharathy, Baihan Lin, Douglas Fridsma, Lee A Fleisher, Monica Lopez-Gonzalez, Reva Singh, Mark G Weiner, Robert Stolper, Russell Baris, Suzanne Sincavage, Tristan Naumann, Tayler Williams, Tien Thi Thuy Bui, Yuri Quintana\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocaf133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of real-world data (RWD) in artificial intelligence (AI) applications for healthcare offers unique opportunities but also poses complex challenges related to interpretability, transparency, safety, efficacy, bias, equity, privacy, ethics, accountability, and stakeholder engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-stakeholder expert panel comprising healthcare professionals, AI developers, policymakers, and other stakeholders was assembled. Their task was to identify critical issues and formulate consensus recommendations, focusing on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI. The panel's work involved an in-person conference and workshop and extensive deliberations over several months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel's findings revealed several critical challenges, including the necessity for data literacy and documentation, the identification and mitigation of bias, privacy and ethics considerations, and the absence of an accountability structure for stakeholder management. To address these, the panel proposed a series of recommendations, such as the adoption of metadata standards for RWD sources, the development of transparency frameworks and instructional labels likened to \\\"nutrition labels\\\" for AI applications, the provision of cross-disciplinary training materials, the implementation of bias detection and mitigation strategies, and the establishment of ongoing monitoring and update processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Guidelines and resources focused on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI are essential for developing safe, effective, equitable, and trustworthy applications. The proposed recommendations provide a foundation for a comprehensive framework addressing the entire lifecycle of healthcare AI, emphasizing the importance of documentation, training, transparency, accountability, and multi-stakeholder engagement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf133\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf133","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在医疗保健人工智能(AI)应用程序中使用真实世界数据(RWD)提供了独特的机会,但也带来了与可解释性、透明度、安全性、有效性、偏见、公平、隐私、道德、问责制和利益相关者参与相关的复杂挑战。方法:召集了一个由医疗保健专业人员、人工智能开发人员、政策制定者和其他利益相关者组成的多利益相关者专家小组。他们的任务是确定关键问题并制定共识性建议,重点是在医疗保健人工智能中负责任地使用RWD。该小组的工作包括一个面对面的会议和研讨会,以及几个月来的广泛审议。结果:小组的调查结果揭示了若干重大挑战,包括数据素养和文件编制的必要性、识别和减轻偏见、隐私和道德考虑,以及缺乏利益攸关方管理的问责结构。为了解决这些问题,小组提出了一系列建议,例如为RWD来源采用元数据标准,为人工智能应用制定透明度框架和类似于“营养标签”的教学标签,提供跨学科培训材料,实施偏见检测和缓解战略,以及建立持续监测和更新进程。结论:在卫生保健人工智能中负责任地使用RWD的指南和资源对于开发安全、有效、公平和可信的应用至关重要。拟议的建议为解决医疗保健人工智能的整个生命周期的综合框架奠定了基础,强调了文件、培训、透明度、问责制和多利益攸关方参与的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards responsible artificial intelligence in healthcare-getting real about real-world data and evidence.

Background: The use of real-world data (RWD) in artificial intelligence (AI) applications for healthcare offers unique opportunities but also poses complex challenges related to interpretability, transparency, safety, efficacy, bias, equity, privacy, ethics, accountability, and stakeholder engagement.

Methods: A multi-stakeholder expert panel comprising healthcare professionals, AI developers, policymakers, and other stakeholders was assembled. Their task was to identify critical issues and formulate consensus recommendations, focusing on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI. The panel's work involved an in-person conference and workshop and extensive deliberations over several months.

Results: The panel's findings revealed several critical challenges, including the necessity for data literacy and documentation, the identification and mitigation of bias, privacy and ethics considerations, and the absence of an accountability structure for stakeholder management. To address these, the panel proposed a series of recommendations, such as the adoption of metadata standards for RWD sources, the development of transparency frameworks and instructional labels likened to "nutrition labels" for AI applications, the provision of cross-disciplinary training materials, the implementation of bias detection and mitigation strategies, and the establishment of ongoing monitoring and update processes.

Conclusion: Guidelines and resources focused on the responsible use of RWD in healthcare AI are essential for developing safe, effective, equitable, and trustworthy applications. The proposed recommendations provide a foundation for a comprehensive framework addressing the entire lifecycle of healthcare AI, emphasizing the importance of documentation, training, transparency, accountability, and multi-stakeholder engagement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信