肥胖患者延迟疝修补的风险和益处:回顾性急诊疝病例系列。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Helen W Li, Maya Weerasooriya, William Gerull, Arnab Majumder, Danny Mou, Jeffrey Blatnik
{"title":"肥胖患者延迟疝修补的风险和益处:回顾性急诊疝病例系列。","authors":"Helen W Li, Maya Weerasooriya, William Gerull, Arnab Majumder, Danny Mou, Jeffrey Blatnik","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12211-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergent abdominal wall hernia repair is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared to elective repair. Patients with significant medical comorbidities, such as morbid obesity, experience higher rates of surgical site complications and hernia recurrence. Experts recommend pre-operative optimization to minimize complication risks; however, few guidelines exist for balancing optimization with the risks of a potential emergent operation. We sought to delineate the outcomes of patients who underwent urgent hernia repair at our center with specific attention to those who attempted pre-operative optimization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who required emergent or urgent abdominal wall hernia repair with the division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, as identified through emergent or urgent case requests submitted at our tertiary academic medical center from 2018 to 2023. We utilized descriptive statistics to characterize patient demographics, hernia characteristics, prior medical history, operative details, and post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 58 total patients enrolled, we noted multiple operative risk factors including advanced age (62 years ± 14.5), high BMI (32.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), numerous medical comorbidities, and high rates of incisional hernias. 20 (34%) patients were previously evaluated in our MIS clinic prior to their urgent repair, and 12 (60%) of these patients had surgery deferred for excess weight. Some patients attended multiple clinic visits, but there were no significant trends between the number of prior visits and weight change. 37 (64%) patients did not receive definitive mesh repair. Of these, 20 (54%) cases cited concern for a contaminated field. Of the total group, 16 (33%) patients ultimately developed a recurrent hernia, including 3 patients who underwent a mesh repair and 13 patients who did not receive a mesh repair.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The timing of an abdominal wall hernia repair remains challenging, particularly in patients with morbid obesity. For these high-risk patients, recognizing decreasing gains in pre-operative weight optimization is a key for avoiding unproductive delays of definitive repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risks and benefits of delaying hernia repair in patients with obesity: a retrospective case series of emergent hernia cases.\",\"authors\":\"Helen W Li, Maya Weerasooriya, William Gerull, Arnab Majumder, Danny Mou, Jeffrey Blatnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-12211-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergent abdominal wall hernia repair is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared to elective repair. Patients with significant medical comorbidities, such as morbid obesity, experience higher rates of surgical site complications and hernia recurrence. Experts recommend pre-operative optimization to minimize complication risks; however, few guidelines exist for balancing optimization with the risks of a potential emergent operation. We sought to delineate the outcomes of patients who underwent urgent hernia repair at our center with specific attention to those who attempted pre-operative optimization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who required emergent or urgent abdominal wall hernia repair with the division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, as identified through emergent or urgent case requests submitted at our tertiary academic medical center from 2018 to 2023. We utilized descriptive statistics to characterize patient demographics, hernia characteristics, prior medical history, operative details, and post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 58 total patients enrolled, we noted multiple operative risk factors including advanced age (62 years ± 14.5), high BMI (32.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), numerous medical comorbidities, and high rates of incisional hernias. 20 (34%) patients were previously evaluated in our MIS clinic prior to their urgent repair, and 12 (60%) of these patients had surgery deferred for excess weight. Some patients attended multiple clinic visits, but there were no significant trends between the number of prior visits and weight change. 37 (64%) patients did not receive definitive mesh repair. Of these, 20 (54%) cases cited concern for a contaminated field. Of the total group, 16 (33%) patients ultimately developed a recurrent hernia, including 3 patients who underwent a mesh repair and 13 patients who did not receive a mesh repair.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The timing of an abdominal wall hernia repair remains challenging, particularly in patients with morbid obesity. For these high-risk patients, recognizing decreasing gains in pre-operative weight optimization is a key for avoiding unproductive delays of definitive repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12211-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12211-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与选择性修补术相比,急诊腹壁疝修补术的发病率和死亡率更高。有明显合并症的患者,如病态肥胖,手术部位并发症和疝气复发率较高。专家建议术前优化以减少并发症风险;然而,很少有指导方针存在于平衡优化与潜在紧急操作的风险。我们试图描述在我们中心接受紧急疝气修复的患者的结果,并特别关注那些尝试术前优化的患者。方法:我们对2018年至2023年在我们的三级学术医疗中心提交的紧急或紧急病例申请中确定的所有需要急诊或紧急腹壁疝修补术的微创外科患者进行回顾性图表回顾。我们使用描述性统计来描述患者人口统计学特征、疝气特征、既往病史、手术细节和术后结果。结果:在入组的58例患者中,我们注意到多种手术危险因素,包括高龄(62岁±14.5岁)、高BMI (32.9 kg/m2)、多种医疗合并症和高切口疝发生率。20例(34%)患者在紧急修复前在MIS诊所进行了评估,其中12例(60%)患者因体重过重而推迟了手术。一些患者多次就诊,但就诊次数与体重变化之间没有明显的趋势。37例(64%)患者未接受最终补片修复。其中,有20起(54%)案例提到了对污染场地的担忧。在整个组中,16例(33%)患者最终发展为复发性疝,包括3例接受补片修复的患者和13例未接受补片修复的患者。结论:腹壁疝修补的时机仍然具有挑战性,特别是对于病态肥胖患者。对于这些高危患者,认识到术前体重优化的减少是避免最终修复无效延迟的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risks and benefits of delaying hernia repair in patients with obesity: a retrospective case series of emergent hernia cases.

Background: Emergent abdominal wall hernia repair is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared to elective repair. Patients with significant medical comorbidities, such as morbid obesity, experience higher rates of surgical site complications and hernia recurrence. Experts recommend pre-operative optimization to minimize complication risks; however, few guidelines exist for balancing optimization with the risks of a potential emergent operation. We sought to delineate the outcomes of patients who underwent urgent hernia repair at our center with specific attention to those who attempted pre-operative optimization.

Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who required emergent or urgent abdominal wall hernia repair with the division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, as identified through emergent or urgent case requests submitted at our tertiary academic medical center from 2018 to 2023. We utilized descriptive statistics to characterize patient demographics, hernia characteristics, prior medical history, operative details, and post-operative outcomes.

Results: Of the 58 total patients enrolled, we noted multiple operative risk factors including advanced age (62 years ± 14.5), high BMI (32.9 kg/m2), numerous medical comorbidities, and high rates of incisional hernias. 20 (34%) patients were previously evaluated in our MIS clinic prior to their urgent repair, and 12 (60%) of these patients had surgery deferred for excess weight. Some patients attended multiple clinic visits, but there were no significant trends between the number of prior visits and weight change. 37 (64%) patients did not receive definitive mesh repair. Of these, 20 (54%) cases cited concern for a contaminated field. Of the total group, 16 (33%) patients ultimately developed a recurrent hernia, including 3 patients who underwent a mesh repair and 13 patients who did not receive a mesh repair.

Conclusion: The timing of an abdominal wall hernia repair remains challenging, particularly in patients with morbid obesity. For these high-risk patients, recognizing decreasing gains in pre-operative weight optimization is a key for avoiding unproductive delays of definitive repair.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信