在创伤性失血性休克的食蟹猕猴模型中,与晶体相比,溶剂-洗涤剂处理的混合人血浆提供了更好的血流动力学稳定性和脑组织氧合。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
SHOCK Pub Date : 2025-09-05 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002686
Leslie E Neidert, Alejandra L Lorenzen, Peter J Hemond, Erica M Molina, Charles F Schwarten, Emily M Corbin, Dominic Lonowski, Anthony E Pusateri, Michael M Tiller, Clifford G Morgan
{"title":"在创伤性失血性休克的食蟹猕猴模型中,与晶体相比,溶剂-洗涤剂处理的混合人血浆提供了更好的血流动力学稳定性和脑组织氧合。","authors":"Leslie E Neidert, Alejandra L Lorenzen, Peter J Hemond, Erica M Molina, Charles F Schwarten, Emily M Corbin, Dominic Lonowski, Anthony E Pusateri, Michael M Tiller, Clifford G Morgan","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trauma studies have demonstrated a long-term survival benefit of early plasma resuscitation compared to crystalloid, with conflicting evidence for improvements in coagulation parameters. To further elucidate resuscitative effects of plasma, we evaluated solvent/detergent-treated pooled human plasma (SDP) in a nonhuman primate model of polytrauma and hemorrhagic shock (PTHS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten anesthetized male cynomolgus macaques underwent PTHS before randomization to receive 20mL/kg of SDP or Lactated Ringers (LRS) at the end of shock (T0). All animals underwent standardized simulated hospital resuscitation at T60, with injury repair and 50% shed blood return followed by 300% shed blood volume in LRS. Data analyzed via t-tests and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Significance=P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant group differences were observed in shock time, blood loss, or resuscitative fluid volumes. At T0, mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and cerebral oxygen saturation (CrSO₂) significantly decreased in both groups. While both groups normalized MAP and SBP by T5, only SDP maintained these levels until the simulated hospital period. CrSO₂ remained significantly lower in the LRS group until simulated hospital resuscitation. SDP significantly improved colloid osmotic pressure (COP) compared to LRS. Coagulation analysis showed increased fibrinogen concentration and coagulation factor activities in the SDP group compared to LRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SDP provides significantly more stable hemodynamic function following PTHS compared to LRS, maintaining MAP, SBP, and CrSO₂ despite both fluids lacking oxygen-carriers, likely due to increased COP, while supporting coagulation. These findings support SDP as a viable resuscitation product for PTHS in austere settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solvent-Detergent Treated Pooled Human Plasma Provides Superior Hemodynamic Stability and Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation Compared to Crystalloid in a Cynomolgus Macaque Model of Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock.\",\"authors\":\"Leslie E Neidert, Alejandra L Lorenzen, Peter J Hemond, Erica M Molina, Charles F Schwarten, Emily M Corbin, Dominic Lonowski, Anthony E Pusateri, Michael M Tiller, Clifford G Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trauma studies have demonstrated a long-term survival benefit of early plasma resuscitation compared to crystalloid, with conflicting evidence for improvements in coagulation parameters. To further elucidate resuscitative effects of plasma, we evaluated solvent/detergent-treated pooled human plasma (SDP) in a nonhuman primate model of polytrauma and hemorrhagic shock (PTHS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten anesthetized male cynomolgus macaques underwent PTHS before randomization to receive 20mL/kg of SDP or Lactated Ringers (LRS) at the end of shock (T0). All animals underwent standardized simulated hospital resuscitation at T60, with injury repair and 50% shed blood return followed by 300% shed blood volume in LRS. Data analyzed via t-tests and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Significance=P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant group differences were observed in shock time, blood loss, or resuscitative fluid volumes. At T0, mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and cerebral oxygen saturation (CrSO₂) significantly decreased in both groups. While both groups normalized MAP and SBP by T5, only SDP maintained these levels until the simulated hospital period. CrSO₂ remained significantly lower in the LRS group until simulated hospital resuscitation. SDP significantly improved colloid osmotic pressure (COP) compared to LRS. Coagulation analysis showed increased fibrinogen concentration and coagulation factor activities in the SDP group compared to LRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SDP provides significantly more stable hemodynamic function following PTHS compared to LRS, maintaining MAP, SBP, and CrSO₂ despite both fluids lacking oxygen-carriers, likely due to increased COP, while supporting coagulation. These findings support SDP as a viable resuscitation product for PTHS in austere settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SHOCK\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SHOCK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002686\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002686","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床创伤研究表明,与晶体相比,早期血浆复苏对长期生存有好处,但关于凝血参数改善的证据相互矛盾。为了进一步阐明血浆的复苏作用,我们在非人类灵长类动物多创伤失血性休克(PTHS)模型中评估了溶剂/洗涤剂处理的混合人血浆(SDP)。方法:10只被麻醉的雄性食蟹猕猴在随机分组前接受PTHS,在休克结束时接受20mL/kg的SDP或乳酸林格氏液(LRS)。所有动物在T60时进行标准化的模拟医院复苏,损伤修复和50%的血流量恢复,LRS的血流量为300%。数据分析采用t检验和双向重复测量方差分析。结果:两组在休克时间、失血量或复苏液体量方面均无显著差异。T0时,两组平均动脉压(MAP)、收缩压(SBP)和脑氧饱和度(crso2)均显著降低。虽然两组均通过T5使MAP和收缩压正常化,但只有SDP维持这些水平直到模拟住院期。在模拟医院复苏之前,LRS组的CrSO₂仍显著降低。与LRS相比,SDP显著改善了胶体渗透压(COP)。凝血分析显示,与LRS相比,SDP组纤维蛋白原浓度和凝血因子活性升高。结论:与LRS相比,PTHS后SDP提供了更稳定的血流动力学功能,维持MAP、SBP和CrSO 2,尽管两种液体都缺乏氧载体,可能是由于COP增加,同时支持凝血。这些发现支持SDP作为严峻环境下PTHS的可行复苏产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Solvent-Detergent Treated Pooled Human Plasma Provides Superior Hemodynamic Stability and Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation Compared to Crystalloid in a Cynomolgus Macaque Model of Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock.

Background: Clinical trauma studies have demonstrated a long-term survival benefit of early plasma resuscitation compared to crystalloid, with conflicting evidence for improvements in coagulation parameters. To further elucidate resuscitative effects of plasma, we evaluated solvent/detergent-treated pooled human plasma (SDP) in a nonhuman primate model of polytrauma and hemorrhagic shock (PTHS).

Methods: Ten anesthetized male cynomolgus macaques underwent PTHS before randomization to receive 20mL/kg of SDP or Lactated Ringers (LRS) at the end of shock (T0). All animals underwent standardized simulated hospital resuscitation at T60, with injury repair and 50% shed blood return followed by 300% shed blood volume in LRS. Data analyzed via t-tests and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Significance=P<0.05.

Results: No significant group differences were observed in shock time, blood loss, or resuscitative fluid volumes. At T0, mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and cerebral oxygen saturation (CrSO₂) significantly decreased in both groups. While both groups normalized MAP and SBP by T5, only SDP maintained these levels until the simulated hospital period. CrSO₂ remained significantly lower in the LRS group until simulated hospital resuscitation. SDP significantly improved colloid osmotic pressure (COP) compared to LRS. Coagulation analysis showed increased fibrinogen concentration and coagulation factor activities in the SDP group compared to LRS.

Conclusion: SDP provides significantly more stable hemodynamic function following PTHS compared to LRS, maintaining MAP, SBP, and CrSO₂ despite both fluids lacking oxygen-carriers, likely due to increased COP, while supporting coagulation. These findings support SDP as a viable resuscitation product for PTHS in austere settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信