关于设立韩国护理执照考试及格分数的建议。

IF 3.7 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Janghee Park, Mi Kyoung Yim, Sujin Shin, Rhayun Song, Jun-Ah Song, Inyoung Lee, Heejeong Kim, Minjae Lee
{"title":"关于设立韩国护理执照考试及格分数的建议。","authors":"Janghee Park, Mi Kyoung Yim, Sujin Shin, Rhayun Song, Jun-Ah Song, Inyoung Lee, Heejeong Kim, Minjae Lee","doi":"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Korean Nursing Licensing Examination (KNLE) is planning to transition to a computer-based test (CBT). This study aims to propose a reasonable and efficient method for setting passing scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standard setting (passing score setting) analysis was conducted using an expert panel over the past 3 years of the national nursing examination. The standard-setting method was modified from Angoff, and the validity of the passing score was verified through the Hofstee method. The standard-setting workshop was conducted in 2 stages: first, a pilot workshop for 2 subjects, followed by a second workshop where 6 additional subjects were selected based on the pilot results. For items with an actual correct answer rate of 90% or higher, the estimated correct answer rate for minimum competency was calculated using the observed correct answer rate. A survey and discussion with the expert panel were also conducted regarding the standard-setting procedures and results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The passing score for the national nursing examination was calculated using the new method, and the score was slightly higher than the existing score. The nursing subject had similar results,; however, the legal subjects varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified Angoff and Hofstee methods were successfully applied to the KNLE. Using the actual correct answer rate as an indicator to derive expected minimum competency was shown to be effective. This approach could streamline future standard-setting processes, particularly when converting to CBT.</p>","PeriodicalId":46098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","volume":"22 ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposal for setting a passing score for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.\",\"authors\":\"Janghee Park, Mi Kyoung Yim, Sujin Shin, Rhayun Song, Jun-Ah Song, Inyoung Lee, Heejeong Kim, Minjae Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Korean Nursing Licensing Examination (KNLE) is planning to transition to a computer-based test (CBT). This study aims to propose a reasonable and efficient method for setting passing scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standard setting (passing score setting) analysis was conducted using an expert panel over the past 3 years of the national nursing examination. The standard-setting method was modified from Angoff, and the validity of the passing score was verified through the Hofstee method. The standard-setting workshop was conducted in 2 stages: first, a pilot workshop for 2 subjects, followed by a second workshop where 6 additional subjects were selected based on the pilot results. For items with an actual correct answer rate of 90% or higher, the estimated correct answer rate for minimum competency was calculated using the observed correct answer rate. A survey and discussion with the expert panel were also conducted regarding the standard-setting procedures and results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The passing score for the national nursing examination was calculated using the new method, and the score was slightly higher than the existing score. The nursing subject had similar results,; however, the legal subjects varied.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified Angoff and Hofstee methods were successfully applied to the KNLE. Using the actual correct answer rate as an indicator to derive expected minimum competency was shown to be effective. This approach could streamline future standard-setting processes, particularly when converting to CBT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:韩国护理执照考试(KNLE)正计划过渡到计算机测试(CBT)。本研究旨在提出一种合理有效的及格分数设置方法。方法:采用专家小组法对近3年全国护理考试成绩进行标准设置(及格分设置)分析。标准制定方法由Angoff改进而来,通过Hofstee方法验证及格分数的有效性。标准制定讲习班分两个阶段进行:首先是一个涉及2个主题的试点讲习班,然后是第二个讲习班,根据试点结果选择另外6个主题。对于实际正确答题率为90%或更高的项目,根据观察到的正确答题率计算最低能力的估计正确答题率。还就制定标准的程序和结果与专家小组进行了调查和讨论。结果:采用新方法计算国家护理考试合格分,分数略高于现有分数。护理组也有类似的结果;然而,法律主体各不相同。结论:改进的Angoff和Hofstee方法可以成功地应用于KNLE。使用实际正确答题率作为一个指标来推导期望的最低胜任能力被证明是有效的。这种方法可以简化未来的标准制定过程,特别是在转换为CBT时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proposal for setting a passing score for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination.

Purpose: The Korean Nursing Licensing Examination (KNLE) is planning to transition to a computer-based test (CBT). This study aims to propose a reasonable and efficient method for setting passing scores.

Methods: A standard setting (passing score setting) analysis was conducted using an expert panel over the past 3 years of the national nursing examination. The standard-setting method was modified from Angoff, and the validity of the passing score was verified through the Hofstee method. The standard-setting workshop was conducted in 2 stages: first, a pilot workshop for 2 subjects, followed by a second workshop where 6 additional subjects were selected based on the pilot results. For items with an actual correct answer rate of 90% or higher, the estimated correct answer rate for minimum competency was calculated using the observed correct answer rate. A survey and discussion with the expert panel were also conducted regarding the standard-setting procedures and results.

Results: The passing score for the national nursing examination was calculated using the new method, and the score was slightly higher than the existing score. The nursing subject had similar results,; however, the legal subjects varied.

Conclusion: The modified Angoff and Hofstee methods were successfully applied to the KNLE. Using the actual correct answer rate as an indicator to derive expected minimum competency was shown to be effective. This approach could streamline future standard-setting processes, particularly when converting to CBT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions aims to provide readers the state-of-the art practical information on the educational evaluation for health professions so that to increase the quality of undergraduate, graduate, and continuing education. It is specialized in educational evaluation including adoption of measurement theory to medical health education, promotion of high stakes examination such as national licensing examinations, improvement of nationwide or international programs of education, computer-based testing, computerized adaptive testing, and medical health regulatory bodies. Its field comprises a variety of professions that address public medical health as following but not limited to: Care workers Dental hygienists Dental technicians Dentists Dietitians Emergency medical technicians Health educators Medical record technicians Medical technologists Midwives Nurses Nursing aides Occupational therapists Opticians Oriental medical doctors Oriental medicine dispensers Oriental pharmacists Pharmacists Physical therapists Physicians Prosthetists and Orthotists Radiological technologists Rehabilitation counselor Sanitary technicians Speech-language therapists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信