腹膜转移患者的加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)定向治疗的真实数据ISSPP PIPAC数据库的第三份年度报告。

IF 2.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Pleura and Peritoneum Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1515/pp-2025-0013
Magnus Skov Jørgensen, Pernille Schjødt Hansen, Claus W Fristrup, Martin Hübner, Jimmy So, Anne-Cecile Ezanno, Peter Hewett, Miguel Ruiz-Marin, Günther A Rezniczek, Özgül Düzgün, Marc Pocard, Francesco Casella, Laura Lay, Marisa Aral, Tarkan Jäger, Felix Laminger, Oliver Glehen, Claire-Angéline Goutard, Laurent Villeneuve, Andrea Di Giorgio, Michael Bau Mortensen
{"title":"腹膜转移患者的加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)定向治疗的真实数据ISSPP PIPAC数据库的第三份年度报告。","authors":"Magnus Skov Jørgensen, Pernille Schjødt Hansen, Claus W Fristrup, Martin Hübner, Jimmy So, Anne-Cecile Ezanno, Peter Hewett, Miguel Ruiz-Marin, Günther A Rezniczek, Özgül Düzgün, Marc Pocard, Francesco Casella, Laura Lay, Marisa Aral, Tarkan Jäger, Felix Laminger, Oliver Glehen, Claire-Angéline Goutard, Laurent Villeneuve, Andrea Di Giorgio, Michael Bau Mortensen","doi":"10.1515/pp-2025-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2020, the International Society for the Study of the Pleura and Peritoneum (ISSPP) launched a database monitoring real-world data on Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)-directed therapy in patients with peritoneal metastases (PM). This study covers data from the third annual report on the ISSPP PIPAC database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic analysis of all data reported to the ISSPP PIPAC database between June 15th, 2020, and November 1st, 2024. We hypothesize that ISSPP PIPAC data align with existing literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen PIPAC centers reported 3224 PIPAC treatments in 1126 patients with PM (median number of treatments 2, range 1-33). The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) at PIPAC 1 was 19 and remained unchanged during subsequent treatments. The number of patients with >500 mL ascites significantly decreased from the first three PIPAC treatments to PIPAC 4+ (p<0.01). Major complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥3b) occurred in 0.7 % of the treatments, while Common. Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades ≥3 were reported in 5.2 %. Peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) was performed in 2306 (72 %) of the treatments. At PIPAC 1, 2, and 3, complete or major response (mean PRGS ≤2) was achieved in 57 %, 72 %, and 75 % of the patients, respectively. Median overall survival from PIPAC 1 was 12.5 months. Patients with complete/major response (mean PRGS ≤2) at PIPAC 1-3 had a longer overall survival compared to patients with minimal/no response (mean PRGS >2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study from the ISSPP PIPAC database provides substantial real-world data demonstrating the feasibility, safety, and potential effect of PIPAC-directed therapy in patients with PM.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":"10 3","pages":"119-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world data on Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)-directed therapy in patients with peritoneal metastases; Third annual report from the ISSPP PIPAC database.\",\"authors\":\"Magnus Skov Jørgensen, Pernille Schjødt Hansen, Claus W Fristrup, Martin Hübner, Jimmy So, Anne-Cecile Ezanno, Peter Hewett, Miguel Ruiz-Marin, Günther A Rezniczek, Özgül Düzgün, Marc Pocard, Francesco Casella, Laura Lay, Marisa Aral, Tarkan Jäger, Felix Laminger, Oliver Glehen, Claire-Angéline Goutard, Laurent Villeneuve, Andrea Di Giorgio, Michael Bau Mortensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/pp-2025-0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In 2020, the International Society for the Study of the Pleura and Peritoneum (ISSPP) launched a database monitoring real-world data on Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)-directed therapy in patients with peritoneal metastases (PM). This study covers data from the third annual report on the ISSPP PIPAC database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic analysis of all data reported to the ISSPP PIPAC database between June 15th, 2020, and November 1st, 2024. We hypothesize that ISSPP PIPAC data align with existing literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen PIPAC centers reported 3224 PIPAC treatments in 1126 patients with PM (median number of treatments 2, range 1-33). The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) at PIPAC 1 was 19 and remained unchanged during subsequent treatments. The number of patients with >500 mL ascites significantly decreased from the first three PIPAC treatments to PIPAC 4+ (p<0.01). Major complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥3b) occurred in 0.7 % of the treatments, while Common. Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades ≥3 were reported in 5.2 %. Peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) was performed in 2306 (72 %) of the treatments. At PIPAC 1, 2, and 3, complete or major response (mean PRGS ≤2) was achieved in 57 %, 72 %, and 75 % of the patients, respectively. Median overall survival from PIPAC 1 was 12.5 months. Patients with complete/major response (mean PRGS ≤2) at PIPAC 1-3 had a longer overall survival compared to patients with minimal/no response (mean PRGS >2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study from the ISSPP PIPAC database provides substantial real-world data demonstrating the feasibility, safety, and potential effect of PIPAC-directed therapy in patients with PM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"119-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458025/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2025-0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleura and Peritoneum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2025-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年,国际胸膜和腹膜研究学会(ISSPP)启动了一个数据库,监测腹膜转移(PM)患者的加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)定向治疗的真实数据。本研究的数据来自ISSPP PIPAC数据库的第三份年度报告。方法:系统分析ISSPP PIPAC数据库在2020年6月15日至2024年11月1日期间上报的所有数据。我们假设ISSPP PIPAC数据与现有文献一致。结果:17个PIPAC中心报告了1126例PM患者的3224次PIPAC治疗(治疗中位数2,范围1-33)。PIPAC 1的中位腹膜癌指数(PCI)为19,在后续治疗期间保持不变。从前三次PIPAC治疗到PIPAC 4+, bbb500 mL腹水患者数量显著减少(p2)。结论:这项来自ISSPP PIPAC数据库的研究提供了大量的真实数据,证明了PIPAC指导治疗PM患者的可行性、安全性和潜在效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world data on Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)-directed therapy in patients with peritoneal metastases; Third annual report from the ISSPP PIPAC database.

Objectives: In 2020, the International Society for the Study of the Pleura and Peritoneum (ISSPP) launched a database monitoring real-world data on Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC)-directed therapy in patients with peritoneal metastases (PM). This study covers data from the third annual report on the ISSPP PIPAC database.

Methods: Systematic analysis of all data reported to the ISSPP PIPAC database between June 15th, 2020, and November 1st, 2024. We hypothesize that ISSPP PIPAC data align with existing literature.

Results: Seventeen PIPAC centers reported 3224 PIPAC treatments in 1126 patients with PM (median number of treatments 2, range 1-33). The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) at PIPAC 1 was 19 and remained unchanged during subsequent treatments. The number of patients with >500 mL ascites significantly decreased from the first three PIPAC treatments to PIPAC 4+ (p<0.01). Major complications (Dindo-Clavien ≥3b) occurred in 0.7 % of the treatments, while Common. Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grades ≥3 were reported in 5.2 %. Peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS) was performed in 2306 (72 %) of the treatments. At PIPAC 1, 2, and 3, complete or major response (mean PRGS ≤2) was achieved in 57 %, 72 %, and 75 % of the patients, respectively. Median overall survival from PIPAC 1 was 12.5 months. Patients with complete/major response (mean PRGS ≤2) at PIPAC 1-3 had a longer overall survival compared to patients with minimal/no response (mean PRGS >2).

Conclusions: This study from the ISSPP PIPAC database provides substantial real-world data demonstrating the feasibility, safety, and potential effect of PIPAC-directed therapy in patients with PM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信