对严重急性脑损伤患者护理人员的弹性干预的多站点开放试点试验:昏迷家庭计划。

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alexander M Presciutti, Elizabeth Rochon, Nicolás Alvarez-Frank, Jessica Daily, Emma Silverman, Melissa Motta, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, David Y Hwang
{"title":"对严重急性脑损伤患者护理人员的弹性干预的多站点开放试点试验:昏迷家庭计划。","authors":"Alexander M Presciutti, Elizabeth Rochon, Nicolás Alvarez-Frank, Jessica Daily, Emma Silverman, Melissa Motta, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, David Y Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s12028-025-02387-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family caregivers of patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) often experience chronic emotional distress and lack evidence-based psychosocial treatments. To address this problem, we followed the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stage Model to develop and pilot the Coma Family Program (COMA-F), a resilience intervention for caregivers of patients with SABI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-arm open pilot clinical trial of COMA-F between February 2024 and February 2025 at three geographically diverse hospitals to test preliminary feasibility and acceptability and to refine the intervention prior to a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT) (NIH stage 1a). Caregivers endorsed elevated distress on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and patients suffered coma for ≥ 24 hours and were committed to tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy. COMA-F involved six sessions focused on building mindfulness and coping skills for managing distress. Primary outcomes were: feasibility of recruitment, feasibility of assessments, adherence, therapist fidelity, satisfaction, credibility, and expectancy. Caregivers completed pretest and posttest measures of distress (HADS) and treatment mechanisms (dispositional mindfulness [Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised], applied mindfulness [Applied Mindfulness Process Scale], coping [Measure of Current Status A]) and exit interviews to provide feedback. We calculated frequencies and proportions of feasibility and acceptability metrics, examined pretest and posttest changes on quantitative measures, and performed explanatory-sequential mixed methods to integrate the quantitative and qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 36 caregivers and enrolled 20. COMA-F exceeded feasibility and acceptability benchmarks (≥ 70% on all) and showed improvements in emotional distress, dispositional mindfulness, and coping, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.8-1.95, p < 0.01). Mixed methods confirmed feasibility, acceptability, and utility of program skills in improving distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support preliminary feasibility and acceptability of COMA-F and further testing in a larger RCT (NIH stage 2).</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT05761925; first submitted February 27, 2023; first caregiver enrolled April 16, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multisite Open Pilot Trial of a Resilience Intervention for Caregivers of Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: The Coma Family Program.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander M Presciutti, Elizabeth Rochon, Nicolás Alvarez-Frank, Jessica Daily, Emma Silverman, Melissa Motta, Ana-Maria Vranceanu, David Y Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-025-02387-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family caregivers of patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) often experience chronic emotional distress and lack evidence-based psychosocial treatments. To address this problem, we followed the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stage Model to develop and pilot the Coma Family Program (COMA-F), a resilience intervention for caregivers of patients with SABI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-arm open pilot clinical trial of COMA-F between February 2024 and February 2025 at three geographically diverse hospitals to test preliminary feasibility and acceptability and to refine the intervention prior to a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT) (NIH stage 1a). Caregivers endorsed elevated distress on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and patients suffered coma for ≥ 24 hours and were committed to tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy. COMA-F involved six sessions focused on building mindfulness and coping skills for managing distress. Primary outcomes were: feasibility of recruitment, feasibility of assessments, adherence, therapist fidelity, satisfaction, credibility, and expectancy. Caregivers completed pretest and posttest measures of distress (HADS) and treatment mechanisms (dispositional mindfulness [Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised], applied mindfulness [Applied Mindfulness Process Scale], coping [Measure of Current Status A]) and exit interviews to provide feedback. We calculated frequencies and proportions of feasibility and acceptability metrics, examined pretest and posttest changes on quantitative measures, and performed explanatory-sequential mixed methods to integrate the quantitative and qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 36 caregivers and enrolled 20. COMA-F exceeded feasibility and acceptability benchmarks (≥ 70% on all) and showed improvements in emotional distress, dispositional mindfulness, and coping, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.8-1.95, p < 0.01). Mixed methods confirmed feasibility, acceptability, and utility of program skills in improving distress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results support preliminary feasibility and acceptability of COMA-F and further testing in a larger RCT (NIH stage 2).</p><p><strong>Trial registration information: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT05761925; first submitted February 27, 2023; first caregiver enrolled April 16, 2024.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02387-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-025-02387-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重急性脑损伤(SABI)患者的家庭照顾者经常经历慢性情绪困扰,缺乏循证心理社会治疗。为了解决这个问题,我们遵循美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)的阶段模型,开发和试点昏迷家庭计划(Coma - f),这是一种针对SABI患者护理人员的恢复力干预。方法:我们于2024年2月至2025年2月在三家地理位置不同的医院进行了COMA-F的单臂开放式试点临床试验,以测试初步的可行性和可接受性,并在更大规模的随机对照试验(NIH 1a期)之前完善干预措施。护理人员在医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)上认可患者的焦虑程度升高,患者昏迷≥24小时,并承诺进行气管造口术和/或胃造口术。COMA-F包括六个会议,重点是建立正念和应对技能,以管理痛苦。主要结局是:招募的可行性、评估的可行性、依从性、治疗师的忠诚、满意度、可信度和期望。照顾者完成了压力测试前和测试后的测量和治疗机制(倾向正念[认知和情感正念量表-修订版]、应用正念[应用正念过程量表]、应对[现状量表A])和离职访谈,以提供反馈。我们计算了可行性和可接受性度量的频率和比例,检查了定量度量的测试前和测试后变化,并采用解释-顺序混合方法整合定量和定性数据。结果:我们筛选了36名护理人员,并招募了20名。COMA-F超过了可行性和可接受性基准(≥70%),并显示出情绪困扰、性格正念和应对方面的改善,具有较大的效应量(Cohen’s d = 0.8-1.95, p)。结论:结果支持COMA-F的初步可行性和可接受性,并支持在更大的随机对照试验(NIH第二阶段)中进一步测试。试验注册信息:ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT05761925;首次提交于2023年2月27日;第一位护理员于2024年4月16日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multisite Open Pilot Trial of a Resilience Intervention for Caregivers of Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: The Coma Family Program.

Background: Family caregivers of patients with severe acute brain injury (SABI) often experience chronic emotional distress and lack evidence-based psychosocial treatments. To address this problem, we followed the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stage Model to develop and pilot the Coma Family Program (COMA-F), a resilience intervention for caregivers of patients with SABI.

Methods: We conducted a single-arm open pilot clinical trial of COMA-F between February 2024 and February 2025 at three geographically diverse hospitals to test preliminary feasibility and acceptability and to refine the intervention prior to a larger randomized controlled trial (RCT) (NIH stage 1a). Caregivers endorsed elevated distress on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and patients suffered coma for ≥ 24 hours and were committed to tracheostomy and/or gastrostomy. COMA-F involved six sessions focused on building mindfulness and coping skills for managing distress. Primary outcomes were: feasibility of recruitment, feasibility of assessments, adherence, therapist fidelity, satisfaction, credibility, and expectancy. Caregivers completed pretest and posttest measures of distress (HADS) and treatment mechanisms (dispositional mindfulness [Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised], applied mindfulness [Applied Mindfulness Process Scale], coping [Measure of Current Status A]) and exit interviews to provide feedback. We calculated frequencies and proportions of feasibility and acceptability metrics, examined pretest and posttest changes on quantitative measures, and performed explanatory-sequential mixed methods to integrate the quantitative and qualitative data.

Results: We screened 36 caregivers and enrolled 20. COMA-F exceeded feasibility and acceptability benchmarks (≥ 70% on all) and showed improvements in emotional distress, dispositional mindfulness, and coping, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.8-1.95, p < 0.01). Mixed methods confirmed feasibility, acceptability, and utility of program skills in improving distress.

Conclusions: Results support preliminary feasibility and acceptability of COMA-F and further testing in a larger RCT (NIH stage 2).

Trial registration information: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT05761925; first submitted February 27, 2023; first caregiver enrolled April 16, 2024.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信