Kwame Adjei, Vakaramoko Diaby, Meng Li, Fatimah Sherbeny, Sandra Suther, Askal A Ali
{"title":"肿瘤医学技术实物期权价值应用的系统综述。","authors":"Kwame Adjei, Vakaramoko Diaby, Meng Li, Fatimah Sherbeny, Sandra Suther, Askal A Ali","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Real option value (ROV) offers an innovative paradigm to evaluate the dynamic value of medical technologies, particularly in cancer, by capturing the value of extending patient survival to access future innovations. Despite its potential, the application of ROV in medical technologies in oncology remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize existing evidence on the application of ROV in medical technologies in oncology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science was conducted to identify peer-reviewed studies published in English from January 2000 to May 2024. In the search query, a combination of keywords related to \"real option value\" and \"cancer\" was used. Key data extracted included study characteristics, objectives, ROV modeling technique, and primary findings. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist was used for quality assessment of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 of 165 studies assessed the ROV of medical therapies, with a primary focus on melanoma, lung cancer, and prostate cancer. ROV was modeled from the ex post and ex ante perspectives. The methodologies employed vary, with common forecasting approaches including the Lee-Carter model to project future decreases in mortality rates, fitting Cox proportional regression models on administrative claims data, or estimating the approval likelihood of early pipeline drugs based on data from early randomized clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ROV represents a critical dimension in evaluating medical technologies in oncology, where innovation is rapid. The implications of ROV extend beyond oncology, with the potential to influence funding, pricing, and access decisions in other disease areas as well. However, challenges such as oversimplification of assumptions for forecasting, methodological consistency, and lack of standardized framework remain pervasive. This systematic review underscores the need to integrate ROV into Health Technology Assessment practices to inform resource allocation and policy decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"1062-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of the applications of the real option value of medical technologies in oncology.\",\"authors\":\"Kwame Adjei, Vakaramoko Diaby, Meng Li, Fatimah Sherbeny, Sandra Suther, Askal A Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Real option value (ROV) offers an innovative paradigm to evaluate the dynamic value of medical technologies, particularly in cancer, by capturing the value of extending patient survival to access future innovations. Despite its potential, the application of ROV in medical technologies in oncology remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize existing evidence on the application of ROV in medical technologies in oncology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science was conducted to identify peer-reviewed studies published in English from January 2000 to May 2024. In the search query, a combination of keywords related to \\\"real option value\\\" and \\\"cancer\\\" was used. Key data extracted included study characteristics, objectives, ROV modeling technique, and primary findings. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist was used for quality assessment of the studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 of 165 studies assessed the ROV of medical therapies, with a primary focus on melanoma, lung cancer, and prostate cancer. ROV was modeled from the ex post and ex ante perspectives. The methodologies employed vary, with common forecasting approaches including the Lee-Carter model to project future decreases in mortality rates, fitting Cox proportional regression models on administrative claims data, or estimating the approval likelihood of early pipeline drugs based on data from early randomized clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ROV represents a critical dimension in evaluating medical technologies in oncology, where innovation is rapid. The implications of ROV extend beyond oncology, with the potential to influence funding, pricing, and access decisions in other disease areas as well. However, challenges such as oversimplification of assumptions for forecasting, methodological consistency, and lack of standardized framework remain pervasive. This systematic review underscores the need to integrate ROV into Health Technology Assessment practices to inform resource allocation and policy decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"31 10\",\"pages\":\"1062-1074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467752/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1062\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:实物期权价值(ROV)提供了一种创新的范式来评估医疗技术的动态价值,特别是在癌症领域,通过捕捉延长患者生存期的价值来获得未来的创新。尽管具有潜力,但ROV在肿瘤学医疗技术中的应用仍未得到充分探索。目的:综合现有的ROV在肿瘤医学技术中的应用证据。方法:综合检索PubMed、ScienceDirect和Web of Science,确定2000年1月至2024年5月发表的英文同行评议研究。在搜索查询中,使用了与“实物期权价值”和“癌症”相关的关键词组合。提取的关键数据包括研究特征、目标、ROV建模技术和主要发现。采用综合卫生经济评估报告标准2022检查表对研究进行质量评估。结果:165项研究中有13项评估了药物治疗的ROV,主要集中在黑色素瘤、肺癌和前列腺癌。从事后和事前两个角度对ROV进行建模。所采用的方法各不相同,常见的预测方法包括预测未来死亡率下降的Lee-Carter模型,对行政索赔数据拟合Cox比例回归模型,或根据早期随机临床试验的数据估计早期管道药物的批准可能性。结论:ROV代表了评估肿瘤学医疗技术的关键维度,该领域创新迅速。ROV的影响不仅限于肿瘤学,还可能影响其他疾病领域的资金、定价和获取决策。然而,诸如预测假设过于简化、方法一致性和缺乏标准化框架等挑战仍然普遍存在。这一系统综述强调了将ROV纳入卫生技术评估实践的必要性,以便为资源分配和政策决策提供信息。
A systematic review of the applications of the real option value of medical technologies in oncology.
Background: Real option value (ROV) offers an innovative paradigm to evaluate the dynamic value of medical technologies, particularly in cancer, by capturing the value of extending patient survival to access future innovations. Despite its potential, the application of ROV in medical technologies in oncology remains underexplored.
Objective: To synthesize existing evidence on the application of ROV in medical technologies in oncology.
Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science was conducted to identify peer-reviewed studies published in English from January 2000 to May 2024. In the search query, a combination of keywords related to "real option value" and "cancer" was used. Key data extracted included study characteristics, objectives, ROV modeling technique, and primary findings. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist was used for quality assessment of the studies.
Results: A total of 13 of 165 studies assessed the ROV of medical therapies, with a primary focus on melanoma, lung cancer, and prostate cancer. ROV was modeled from the ex post and ex ante perspectives. The methodologies employed vary, with common forecasting approaches including the Lee-Carter model to project future decreases in mortality rates, fitting Cox proportional regression models on administrative claims data, or estimating the approval likelihood of early pipeline drugs based on data from early randomized clinical trials.
Conclusions: The ROV represents a critical dimension in evaluating medical technologies in oncology, where innovation is rapid. The implications of ROV extend beyond oncology, with the potential to influence funding, pricing, and access decisions in other disease areas as well. However, challenges such as oversimplification of assumptions for forecasting, methodological consistency, and lack of standardized framework remain pervasive. This systematic review underscores the need to integrate ROV into Health Technology Assessment practices to inform resource allocation and policy decisions.
期刊介绍:
JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.