原发性立体定向放射治疗对未切除的非小细胞肺癌复发的临床和经济影响:一项使用SEER-Medicare数据的真实世界研究。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Pragya Rai, Andrew Song, Su Zhang, Yan Song, Chi Gao, Anya Jiang, Jiayang Li, Peixi Jiang, James Signorovitch, Ashwini Arunachalam, Ayman Samkari, Megan E Daly
{"title":"原发性立体定向放射治疗对未切除的非小细胞肺癌复发的临床和经济影响:一项使用SEER-Medicare数据的真实世界研究。","authors":"Pragya Rai, Andrew Song, Su Zhang, Yan Song, Chi Gao, Anya Jiang, Jiayang Li, Peixi Jiang, James Signorovitch, Ashwini Arunachalam, Ayman Samkari, Megan E Daly","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the recommended treatment for inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although prior research has assessed overall survival (OS) and recurrence rates post-SBRT, limited data exist on the clinical and economic impact of recurrence and the association between event-free survival (EFS) and OS in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare OS, health care resource utilization (HRU), and costs between patients with early-stage NSCLC receiving primary SBRT, with and without recurrence, and assess the association between real-world EFS (rwEFS) and OS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SEER-Medicare database (2007-2020) was used to identify patients with stage I-IIB (N0) NSCLC receiving primary SBRT. Patients were categorized into recurrence and nonrecurrence cohorts based on disease recurrence status post-SBRT. OS, all-cause and NSCLC-related HRU, and health care costs were compared between patients with and without recurrence. The correlation between OS and rwEFS was assessed using the normal scores rank correlation and landmark analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,014 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,455 (48.3%) experiencing disease recurrence. Median OS was significantly shorter for the recurrence cohort (18.9 months) compared with the nonrecurrence cohort (51.4 months; log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients with recurrence had a 2.16-fold higher risk of death (95% CI = 1.94-2.42; <i>P</i> < 0.001). HRU and health care costs were significantly higher in the recurrence cohort, with adjusted monthly all-cause and NSCLC-related costs per patient exceeding those of nonrecurrence patients by $5,458 and $3,838, respectively (both <i>P</i> < 0.001). A significant correlation was observed between rwEFS and OS (ρ = 0.74; <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recurrence after SBRT in unresected, early-stage NSCLC was associated with worse survival and substantial economic burden. The strong correlation between rwEFS and OS suggests that EFS may serve as a good predictor for OS and be a clinically relevant trial endpoint. These findings highlight the need for novel strategies to prevent/delay recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"31 10","pages":"1006-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and economic impact of recurrence in unresected non-small cell lung cancer treated with primary stereotactic body radiotherapy: A real-world study using SEER-Medicare data.\",\"authors\":\"Pragya Rai, Andrew Song, Su Zhang, Yan Song, Chi Gao, Anya Jiang, Jiayang Li, Peixi Jiang, James Signorovitch, Ashwini Arunachalam, Ayman Samkari, Megan E Daly\",\"doi\":\"10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the recommended treatment for inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although prior research has assessed overall survival (OS) and recurrence rates post-SBRT, limited data exist on the clinical and economic impact of recurrence and the association between event-free survival (EFS) and OS in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare OS, health care resource utilization (HRU), and costs between patients with early-stage NSCLC receiving primary SBRT, with and without recurrence, and assess the association between real-world EFS (rwEFS) and OS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SEER-Medicare database (2007-2020) was used to identify patients with stage I-IIB (N0) NSCLC receiving primary SBRT. Patients were categorized into recurrence and nonrecurrence cohorts based on disease recurrence status post-SBRT. OS, all-cause and NSCLC-related HRU, and health care costs were compared between patients with and without recurrence. The correlation between OS and rwEFS was assessed using the normal scores rank correlation and landmark analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,014 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,455 (48.3%) experiencing disease recurrence. Median OS was significantly shorter for the recurrence cohort (18.9 months) compared with the nonrecurrence cohort (51.4 months; log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients with recurrence had a 2.16-fold higher risk of death (95% CI = 1.94-2.42; <i>P</i> < 0.001). HRU and health care costs were significantly higher in the recurrence cohort, with adjusted monthly all-cause and NSCLC-related costs per patient exceeding those of nonrecurrence patients by $5,458 and $3,838, respectively (both <i>P</i> < 0.001). A significant correlation was observed between rwEFS and OS (ρ = 0.74; <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recurrence after SBRT in unresected, early-stage NSCLC was associated with worse survival and substantial economic burden. The strong correlation between rwEFS and OS suggests that EFS may serve as a good predictor for OS and be a clinically relevant trial endpoint. These findings highlight the need for novel strategies to prevent/delay recurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"31 10\",\"pages\":\"1006-1016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467756/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.10.1006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)是不能手术的早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的推荐治疗方法。尽管先前的研究已经评估了sbrt后的总生存期(OS)和复发率,但在该患者群体中,关于复发的临床和经济影响以及无事件生存期(EFS)和OS之间关系的数据有限。目的:比较接受原发性SBRT的早期非小细胞肺癌患者的生存期、医疗资源利用率(HRU)和成本,并评估真实世界EFS (rwEFS)与生存期之间的关系。方法:使用SEER-Medicare数据库(2007-2020)来识别接受原发性SBRT治疗的I-IIB期(N0) NSCLC患者。根据sbrt后的疾病复发情况,将患者分为复发组和非复发组。比较复发和无复发患者的OS、全因和非小细胞肺癌相关HRU和医疗费用。OS与rwEFS的相关性采用正态评分、秩相关和里程碑分析进行评估。结果:共有3014例患者符合纳入标准,其中1455例(48.3%)出现疾病复发。复发组的中位生存期(18.9个月)明显短于非复发组(51.4个月);log-rank P P P P结论:未切除的早期非小细胞肺癌SBRT后复发与较差的生存率和沉重的经济负担相关。rwEFS和OS之间的强相关性表明,EFS可以作为OS的良好预测因子,并且是临床相关的试验终点。这些发现强调需要新的策略来预防/延迟复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and economic impact of recurrence in unresected non-small cell lung cancer treated with primary stereotactic body radiotherapy: A real-world study using SEER-Medicare data.

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the recommended treatment for inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although prior research has assessed overall survival (OS) and recurrence rates post-SBRT, limited data exist on the clinical and economic impact of recurrence and the association between event-free survival (EFS) and OS in this patient population.

Objective: To compare OS, health care resource utilization (HRU), and costs between patients with early-stage NSCLC receiving primary SBRT, with and without recurrence, and assess the association between real-world EFS (rwEFS) and OS.

Methods: The SEER-Medicare database (2007-2020) was used to identify patients with stage I-IIB (N0) NSCLC receiving primary SBRT. Patients were categorized into recurrence and nonrecurrence cohorts based on disease recurrence status post-SBRT. OS, all-cause and NSCLC-related HRU, and health care costs were compared between patients with and without recurrence. The correlation between OS and rwEFS was assessed using the normal scores rank correlation and landmark analyses.

Results: A total of 3,014 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 1,455 (48.3%) experiencing disease recurrence. Median OS was significantly shorter for the recurrence cohort (18.9 months) compared with the nonrecurrence cohort (51.4 months; log-rank P < 0.001). Patients with recurrence had a 2.16-fold higher risk of death (95% CI = 1.94-2.42; P < 0.001). HRU and health care costs were significantly higher in the recurrence cohort, with adjusted monthly all-cause and NSCLC-related costs per patient exceeding those of nonrecurrence patients by $5,458 and $3,838, respectively (both P < 0.001). A significant correlation was observed between rwEFS and OS (ρ = 0.74; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Recurrence after SBRT in unresected, early-stage NSCLC was associated with worse survival and substantial economic burden. The strong correlation between rwEFS and OS suggests that EFS may serve as a good predictor for OS and be a clinically relevant trial endpoint. These findings highlight the need for novel strategies to prevent/delay recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信