领先的学习型卫生系统:建立和实施学习型卫生系统的策略。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Dawn M Bravata, Cathy C Schubert, Amy M Kilbourne, Scotte R Hartronft, Ashley L Schwartzkopf, Jennifer L Myers, Mindy E Flanagan, Claire E Donnelly, Stanley E Taylor, Mathew J Reeves, Anthony J Perkins, Laura E Myers, Indrakshi Roy, Robert E Burke, Rachael A Beard, Marcos Montagnini, Shivani K Jindal, Greg Arling, Caroline Madrigal, Nicholas A Rattray
{"title":"领先的学习型卫生系统:建立和实施学习型卫生系统的策略。","authors":"Dawn M Bravata, Cathy C Schubert, Amy M Kilbourne, Scotte R Hartronft, Ashley L Schwartzkopf, Jennifer L Myers, Mindy E Flanagan, Claire E Donnelly, Stanley E Taylor, Mathew J Reeves, Anthony J Perkins, Laura E Myers, Indrakshi Roy, Robert E Burke, Rachael A Beard, Marcos Montagnini, Shivani K Jindal, Greg Arling, Caroline Madrigal, Nicholas A Rattray","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09849-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning health systems (LHS) improve patient and provider experiences, population health, and health system performance. LHS leaders develop LHS' social and scientific infrastructures and align the LHS with host organization's priorities. Although researchers have examined data infrastructure and Learning Community configurations, few studies have evaluated discrete strategies leaders deploy to construct a LHS.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We described methods used to establish the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Geriatric LHS (GLHS) supporting older Veterans transitioning from hospital to home and examined strategies GLHS leaders used to conduct LHS activities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative methods were employed to review notes from all meetings and post-meeting debriefs from encounters with operational partners, Learning Community members, and Quantitative and Qualitative Data Core subcommittees. Member checking with Learning Community and Data Core representatives led to iterative refinement of findings. A seven-question survey examined Learning Community member satisfaction with the GLHS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten of 16 Learning Community members (62.5%) completed surveys, indicating that the GLHS met Learning Community members' needs. The four key GLHS structural elements were (1) the imperative of maintaining an Idea Repository, (2) the value of notetaking and formal debriefs, (3) the cadence of meetings, and (4) the role of the newsletter to promote engagement. Five themes described core activities/perspectives GLHS operational leaders used: (1) listening to the Learning Community; (2) modifying analyses in response to Learning Community input; (3) including diverse perspectives; (4) managing organizational complexity; and (5) serving the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GLHS illustrates the importance of active listening, collaborative engagement, and responsive adaptation to advance LHS objectives. LHS leadership strategies such as an Idea Repository and iterative feedback mechanisms fostered stakeholder participation and informed data-driven improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leading Learning Health Systems: Strategies Used to Establish and Conduct a Learning Health System.\",\"authors\":\"Dawn M Bravata, Cathy C Schubert, Amy M Kilbourne, Scotte R Hartronft, Ashley L Schwartzkopf, Jennifer L Myers, Mindy E Flanagan, Claire E Donnelly, Stanley E Taylor, Mathew J Reeves, Anthony J Perkins, Laura E Myers, Indrakshi Roy, Robert E Burke, Rachael A Beard, Marcos Montagnini, Shivani K Jindal, Greg Arling, Caroline Madrigal, Nicholas A Rattray\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-025-09849-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Learning health systems (LHS) improve patient and provider experiences, population health, and health system performance. LHS leaders develop LHS' social and scientific infrastructures and align the LHS with host organization's priorities. Although researchers have examined data infrastructure and Learning Community configurations, few studies have evaluated discrete strategies leaders deploy to construct a LHS.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We described methods used to establish the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Geriatric LHS (GLHS) supporting older Veterans transitioning from hospital to home and examined strategies GLHS leaders used to conduct LHS activities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative methods were employed to review notes from all meetings and post-meeting debriefs from encounters with operational partners, Learning Community members, and Quantitative and Qualitative Data Core subcommittees. Member checking with Learning Community and Data Core representatives led to iterative refinement of findings. A seven-question survey examined Learning Community member satisfaction with the GLHS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten of 16 Learning Community members (62.5%) completed surveys, indicating that the GLHS met Learning Community members' needs. The four key GLHS structural elements were (1) the imperative of maintaining an Idea Repository, (2) the value of notetaking and formal debriefs, (3) the cadence of meetings, and (4) the role of the newsletter to promote engagement. Five themes described core activities/perspectives GLHS operational leaders used: (1) listening to the Learning Community; (2) modifying analyses in response to Learning Community input; (3) including diverse perspectives; (4) managing organizational complexity; and (5) serving the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GLHS illustrates the importance of active listening, collaborative engagement, and responsive adaptation to advance LHS objectives. LHS leadership strategies such as an Idea Repository and iterative feedback mechanisms fostered stakeholder participation and informed data-driven improvements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09849-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09849-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学习型卫生系统(LHS)可改善患者和提供者的经验、人口健康和卫生系统绩效。LHS领导者开发LHS的社会和科学基础设施,并使LHS与主办组织的优先事项保持一致。尽管研究人员已经研究了数据基础设施和学习社区配置,但很少有研究评估领导者为构建LHS而部署的离散策略。目的:我们描述了建立退伍军人事务部(VA)老年LHS (GLHS)支持老年退伍军人从医院到家庭过渡的方法,并研究了GLHS领导人用于开展LHS活动的策略。设计:采用定性方法来审查所有会议的记录,以及与业务合作伙伴、学习社区成员以及定量和定性数据核心小组委员会会面时的会后汇报。与学习社区和数据核心代表的成员检查导致了结果的迭代细化。一项包含七个问题的调查调查了学习社区成员对GLHS的满意度。结果:16名学习社区成员中有10人(62.5%)完成了调查,表明GLHS满足了学习社区成员的需求。GLHS的四个关键结构要素是(1)维护创意库的必要性,(2)记笔记和正式汇报的价值,(3)会议的节奏,以及(4)通讯在促进参与方面的作用。五个主题描述了GLHS业务领导者使用的核心活动/观点:(1)倾听学习社区;(2)根据学习社区的意见修改分析;(3)包容多元视角;(4)管理组织复杂性;(5)服务于医疗体系。结论:GLHS说明了积极倾听、协作参与和响应性适应对于推进LHS目标的重要性。LHS的领导策略,如Idea Repository和迭代反馈机制,促进了利益相关者的参与和数据驱动的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leading Learning Health Systems: Strategies Used to Establish and Conduct a Learning Health System.

Background: Learning health systems (LHS) improve patient and provider experiences, population health, and health system performance. LHS leaders develop LHS' social and scientific infrastructures and align the LHS with host organization's priorities. Although researchers have examined data infrastructure and Learning Community configurations, few studies have evaluated discrete strategies leaders deploy to construct a LHS.

Objectives: We described methods used to establish the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Geriatric LHS (GLHS) supporting older Veterans transitioning from hospital to home and examined strategies GLHS leaders used to conduct LHS activities.

Design: Qualitative methods were employed to review notes from all meetings and post-meeting debriefs from encounters with operational partners, Learning Community members, and Quantitative and Qualitative Data Core subcommittees. Member checking with Learning Community and Data Core representatives led to iterative refinement of findings. A seven-question survey examined Learning Community member satisfaction with the GLHS.

Results: Ten of 16 Learning Community members (62.5%) completed surveys, indicating that the GLHS met Learning Community members' needs. The four key GLHS structural elements were (1) the imperative of maintaining an Idea Repository, (2) the value of notetaking and formal debriefs, (3) the cadence of meetings, and (4) the role of the newsletter to promote engagement. Five themes described core activities/perspectives GLHS operational leaders used: (1) listening to the Learning Community; (2) modifying analyses in response to Learning Community input; (3) including diverse perspectives; (4) managing organizational complexity; and (5) serving the healthcare system.

Conclusions: The GLHS illustrates the importance of active listening, collaborative engagement, and responsive adaptation to advance LHS objectives. LHS leadership strategies such as an Idea Repository and iterative feedback mechanisms fostered stakeholder participation and informed data-driven improvements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信