颈腰椎联合推拿治疗对颈椎病患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Liu Ziqing, Cao He, Li Zhangjie, Yu Qiangqiang, Sang Lan, Duan Chaoyang
{"title":"颈腰椎联合推拿治疗对颈椎病患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Liu Ziqing, Cao He, Li Zhangjie, Yu Qiangqiang, Sang Lan, Duan Chaoyang","doi":"10.1177/10538127251381073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCervical radiculopathy (CR) is an important public health issue worldwide. Manual therapy is a valid treatment option for CR.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with CR.Methods47 participants were recruited and randomly divided into Group A (n = 25) and Group B (n = 22) using random number table method. Group A received both cervical and lumbar mobilization, while Group B only received cervical mobilization. The experiment conducted 12 sessions over four weeks. Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured pre and post the experiment.ResultsThere was no significant difference in baseline indicators between the two groups pre the experiment (P > . 05). Four weeks later, compared pre and post within the group, both groups showed improvement in NDI, VAS, and ROM (P < . 05), with Group A showing slightly higher improvement in various indicators than Group B; Compared between groups, Group B showed significant improvements in flexion [mean difference 2.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.20 to 4.74, t = 2.19, P = 0.033], extension [2.76; 0.94 to 4.57, t = 3.06, P = 0.004], left flexion [3.12; 1.45 to 4.80, t = 3.75, P < 0.00], right flexion [3.08; 1.43 to 4.74, t = 3.76, P < 0.00], while NDI, VAS, left rotation, and right rotation ROM did not show significant differences (P > . 05).ConclusionsCervico-lumbar combination mobilization therapy can improve flexion, extension, left and right flexion ROM in patients with CR, and the improvement in cervical dysfunction and pain were not superior to cervical mobilization alone. The cervico-lumbar combination therapy provides a new perspective for manual therapists and is expected to attract the attention of clinical practitioners. Further clinical studies are needed in the future to confirm the actual impact of combination manual therapy on the symptoms and signs of the CR population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251381073"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy : A randomized controlled pilot trial.\",\"authors\":\"Liu Ziqing, Cao He, Li Zhangjie, Yu Qiangqiang, Sang Lan, Duan Chaoyang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538127251381073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundCervical radiculopathy (CR) is an important public health issue worldwide. Manual therapy is a valid treatment option for CR.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with CR.Methods47 participants were recruited and randomly divided into Group A (n = 25) and Group B (n = 22) using random number table method. Group A received both cervical and lumbar mobilization, while Group B only received cervical mobilization. The experiment conducted 12 sessions over four weeks. Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured pre and post the experiment.ResultsThere was no significant difference in baseline indicators between the two groups pre the experiment (P > . 05). Four weeks later, compared pre and post within the group, both groups showed improvement in NDI, VAS, and ROM (P < . 05), with Group A showing slightly higher improvement in various indicators than Group B; Compared between groups, Group B showed significant improvements in flexion [mean difference 2.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.20 to 4.74, t = 2.19, P = 0.033], extension [2.76; 0.94 to 4.57, t = 3.06, P = 0.004], left flexion [3.12; 1.45 to 4.80, t = 3.75, P < 0.00], right flexion [3.08; 1.43 to 4.74, t = 3.76, P < 0.00], while NDI, VAS, left rotation, and right rotation ROM did not show significant differences (P > . 05).ConclusionsCervico-lumbar combination mobilization therapy can improve flexion, extension, left and right flexion ROM in patients with CR, and the improvement in cervical dysfunction and pain were not superior to cervical mobilization alone. The cervico-lumbar combination therapy provides a new perspective for manual therapists and is expected to attract the attention of clinical practitioners. Further clinical studies are needed in the future to confirm the actual impact of combination manual therapy on the symptoms and signs of the CR population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10538127251381073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251381073\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251381073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颈神经根病(CR)是世界范围内一个重要的公共卫生问题。目的探讨颈腰椎联合推拿疗法治疗cr的疗效。方法采用随机数字表法,随机分为a组(n = 25)和B组(n = 22) 47例。A组同时进行颈椎和腰椎活动,B组仅进行颈椎活动。实验在四周内进行了12次。实验前后分别测量颈部残疾指数(NDI)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和颈椎活动度(ROM)。结果两组患者实验前各项基线指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。05)。4周后,比较组内治疗前后,两组患者NDI、VAS、ROM均有改善(P。05)。结论腰椎联合活动疗法可改善CR患者屈伸、左、右屈曲ROM,且对颈椎功能障碍和疼痛的改善并不优于单纯的颈椎活动疗法。颈椎腰椎联合治疗为手工治疗师提供了一个新的视角,有望引起临床从业者的重视。未来需要进一步的临床研究来证实联合手法治疗对CR人群症状和体征的实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy : A randomized controlled pilot trial.

BackgroundCervical radiculopathy (CR) is an important public health issue worldwide. Manual therapy is a valid treatment option for CR.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the cervico-lumbar combination manual therapy in patients with CR.Methods47 participants were recruited and randomly divided into Group A (n = 25) and Group B (n = 22) using random number table method. Group A received both cervical and lumbar mobilization, while Group B only received cervical mobilization. The experiment conducted 12 sessions over four weeks. Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and cervical range of motion (ROM) were measured pre and post the experiment.ResultsThere was no significant difference in baseline indicators between the two groups pre the experiment (P > . 05). Four weeks later, compared pre and post within the group, both groups showed improvement in NDI, VAS, and ROM (P < . 05), with Group A showing slightly higher improvement in various indicators than Group B; Compared between groups, Group B showed significant improvements in flexion [mean difference 2.47; 95% confidence interval: 0.20 to 4.74, t = 2.19, P = 0.033], extension [2.76; 0.94 to 4.57, t = 3.06, P = 0.004], left flexion [3.12; 1.45 to 4.80, t = 3.75, P < 0.00], right flexion [3.08; 1.43 to 4.74, t = 3.76, P < 0.00], while NDI, VAS, left rotation, and right rotation ROM did not show significant differences (P > . 05).ConclusionsCervico-lumbar combination mobilization therapy can improve flexion, extension, left and right flexion ROM in patients with CR, and the improvement in cervical dysfunction and pain were not superior to cervical mobilization alone. The cervico-lumbar combination therapy provides a new perspective for manual therapists and is expected to attract the attention of clinical practitioners. Further clinical studies are needed in the future to confirm the actual impact of combination manual therapy on the symptoms and signs of the CR population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信