基于机器学习的围手术期神经认知障碍风险预测模型的开发。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Hengjun Wan , Qing Zhong , Ana Kowark , Mark Coburn , Yuling Tang , Yiyun Li , Xiaobin Wang , Qiuran Zheng , Xiaoxia Duan
{"title":"基于机器学习的围手术期神经认知障碍风险预测模型的开发。","authors":"Hengjun Wan ,&nbsp;Qing Zhong ,&nbsp;Ana Kowark ,&nbsp;Mark Coburn ,&nbsp;Yuling Tang ,&nbsp;Yiyun Li ,&nbsp;Xiaobin Wang ,&nbsp;Qiuran Zheng ,&nbsp;Xiaoxia Duan","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.112016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) is a common complication that significantly increases patient mortality and healthcare burden. Existing predictive models lack standardisation and personalisation, especially for elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac elective surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study first identified 13 key feature variables through LASSO regression and then constructed ten machine learning prediction models based on this subset of variables. Model performance was validated via ROC/AUC and decision curve analysis. SHAP interpreted the optimal model, enabling development of a clinical risk assessment tool. Kaplan-Meier analysis examined the association between risk factors and PND onset timing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The incidence of PND was 12.5 % (255/2042). The AUC values across the ten machine learning models ranged from 0.615 to 0.877. Among these, the neural network model demonstrated the optimal predictive performance (AUC = 0.877, 95 % CI: 0.839–0.916). SHAP analysis identified hyperlipidaemia (highest SHAP value), smoking, ASA classification III, and low education level as key risk factors. Survival analysis showed that smoking, ASA classification III, and hypertension were associated with earlier onset of PND (log-rank test, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study systematically identified core risk factors for PND in non-cardiac surgical patients using machine learning, and developed both logistic regression-based nomograms and online tools that prioritize interpretability and practicality to support clinical decision-making. The primary modifiable factors include hyperlipidaemia, smoking, and ASA classification. Survival analysis revealed that smokers and hypertensive patients experienced earlier onset of perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND). However, multicentre validation is warranted, alongside the development of individualised strategies informed by risk stratification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 112016"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for perioperative neurocognitive disorders\",\"authors\":\"Hengjun Wan ,&nbsp;Qing Zhong ,&nbsp;Ana Kowark ,&nbsp;Mark Coburn ,&nbsp;Yuling Tang ,&nbsp;Yiyun Li ,&nbsp;Xiaobin Wang ,&nbsp;Qiuran Zheng ,&nbsp;Xiaoxia Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.112016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) is a common complication that significantly increases patient mortality and healthcare burden. Existing predictive models lack standardisation and personalisation, especially for elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac elective surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study first identified 13 key feature variables through LASSO regression and then constructed ten machine learning prediction models based on this subset of variables. Model performance was validated via ROC/AUC and decision curve analysis. SHAP interpreted the optimal model, enabling development of a clinical risk assessment tool. Kaplan-Meier analysis examined the association between risk factors and PND onset timing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The incidence of PND was 12.5 % (255/2042). The AUC values across the ten machine learning models ranged from 0.615 to 0.877. Among these, the neural network model demonstrated the optimal predictive performance (AUC = 0.877, 95 % CI: 0.839–0.916). SHAP analysis identified hyperlipidaemia (highest SHAP value), smoking, ASA classification III, and low education level as key risk factors. Survival analysis showed that smoking, ASA classification III, and hypertension were associated with earlier onset of PND (log-rank test, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study systematically identified core risk factors for PND in non-cardiac surgical patients using machine learning, and developed both logistic regression-based nomograms and online tools that prioritize interpretability and practicality to support clinical decision-making. The primary modifiable factors include hyperlipidaemia, smoking, and ASA classification. Survival analysis revealed that smokers and hypertensive patients experienced earlier onset of perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND). However, multicentre validation is warranted, alongside the development of individualised strategies informed by risk stratification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112016\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025002776\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025002776","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:围手术期神经认知障碍(PND)是一种常见的并发症,显著增加患者死亡率和医疗负担。现有的预测模型缺乏标准化和个性化,特别是对于接受非心脏选择性手术的老年患者。方法:本研究首先通过LASSO回归识别13个关键特征变量,然后基于这些变量子集构建10个机器学习预测模型。通过ROC/AUC和决策曲线分析验证模型的性能。SHAP解释了最佳模型,从而开发了临床风险评估工具。Kaplan-Meier分析检验了危险因素与PND发病时间之间的关系。结果:PND的发生率为12.5%(255/2042)。10个机器学习模型的AUC值在0.615到0.877之间。其中,神经网络模型的预测效果最优(AUC = 0.877, 95% CI: 0.839 ~ 0.916)。SHAP分析发现高脂血症(最高SHAP值)、吸烟、ASA III级和低教育水平是关键危险因素。生存分析显示,吸烟、ASA分类III和高血压与PND的早期发病有关(log-rank检验,P)。结论:本研究利用机器学习系统地确定了非心脏手术患者PND的核心危险因素,并开发了基于logistic回归的nomogram和在线工具,优先考虑可解释性和实用性,以支持临床决策。可改变的主要因素包括高脂血症、吸烟和ASA分级。生存分析显示,吸烟者和高血压患者围手术期神经认知障碍(PND)发病较早。然而,多中心验证是必要的,同时根据风险分层制定个性化策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for perioperative neurocognitive disorders

Background

Perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) is a common complication that significantly increases patient mortality and healthcare burden. Existing predictive models lack standardisation and personalisation, especially for elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac elective surgery.

Methods

This study first identified 13 key feature variables through LASSO regression and then constructed ten machine learning prediction models based on this subset of variables. Model performance was validated via ROC/AUC and decision curve analysis. SHAP interpreted the optimal model, enabling development of a clinical risk assessment tool. Kaplan-Meier analysis examined the association between risk factors and PND onset timing.

Results

The incidence of PND was 12.5 % (255/2042). The AUC values across the ten machine learning models ranged from 0.615 to 0.877. Among these, the neural network model demonstrated the optimal predictive performance (AUC = 0.877, 95 % CI: 0.839–0.916). SHAP analysis identified hyperlipidaemia (highest SHAP value), smoking, ASA classification III, and low education level as key risk factors. Survival analysis showed that smoking, ASA classification III, and hypertension were associated with earlier onset of PND (log-rank test, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

This study systematically identified core risk factors for PND in non-cardiac surgical patients using machine learning, and developed both logistic regression-based nomograms and online tools that prioritize interpretability and practicality to support clinical decision-making. The primary modifiable factors include hyperlipidaemia, smoking, and ASA classification. Survival analysis revealed that smokers and hypertensive patients experienced earlier onset of perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND). However, multicentre validation is warranted, alongside the development of individualised strategies informed by risk stratification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信