{"title":"表皮生长因子受体突变的非小细胞肺癌患者受益于免疫检查点抑制剂的特点:一项系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Haodi Zhou, Beiyu Liang, Li-Chin Lu, Chia-Pang Chan, Jun-He Yang, Shao-Huan Lan","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after resistance to targeted therapy; however, responses remain limited. This study identified predictors of ICI efficacy to inform treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched through September 17, 2024, for studies examining associations between clinical benefit and patient characteristics during ICI therapy. Progression-free survival and overall survival were used to determine outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 18 studies involving 1151 patients. Combination therapy improved outcomes: ICI plus antiangiogenic therapy versus ICI monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-1.52) and ICI plus chemotherapy versus ICI monotherapy (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32-0.65). Predictive genetic factors included atypical versus classical EGFR mutations (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32-0.64) and exon 21 L858R versus exon 19 deletions (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.71). Favorable biomarkers included low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; HR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.16-3.11) and positive programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35-0.96). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS) was associated with poor outcomes (HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.37-3.01). Age, sex, smoking status, and histological subtype exhibited weaker or nonsignificant associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with atypical EGFR or L858R mutations, high PD-L1 expression, low NLR, and good ECOG-PS are more likely to benefit from ICI therapy. Combining ICIs with chemotherapy or antiangiogenic agents enhances efficacy. Younger age, smoking history, and squamous cell carcinoma may also associate with improved outcomes, but further validation is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Benefiting From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Haodi Zhou, Beiyu Liang, Li-Chin Lu, Chia-Pang Chan, Jun-He Yang, Shao-Huan Lan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after resistance to targeted therapy; however, responses remain limited. This study identified predictors of ICI efficacy to inform treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched through September 17, 2024, for studies examining associations between clinical benefit and patient characteristics during ICI therapy. Progression-free survival and overall survival were used to determine outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 18 studies involving 1151 patients. Combination therapy improved outcomes: ICI plus antiangiogenic therapy versus ICI monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-1.52) and ICI plus chemotherapy versus ICI monotherapy (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32-0.65). Predictive genetic factors included atypical versus classical EGFR mutations (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32-0.64) and exon 21 L858R versus exon 19 deletions (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.71). Favorable biomarkers included low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; HR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.16-3.11) and positive programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35-0.96). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS) was associated with poor outcomes (HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.37-3.01). Age, sex, smoking status, and histological subtype exhibited weaker or nonsignificant associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with atypical EGFR or L858R mutations, high PD-L1 expression, low NLR, and good ECOG-PS are more likely to benefit from ICI therapy. Combining ICIs with chemotherapy or antiangiogenic agents enhances efficacy. Younger age, smoking history, and squamous cell carcinoma may also associate with improved outcomes, but further validation is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.08.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Characteristics of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Nonsmall-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Benefiting From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after resistance to targeted therapy; however, responses remain limited. This study identified predictors of ICI efficacy to inform treatment strategies.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched through September 17, 2024, for studies examining associations between clinical benefit and patient characteristics during ICI therapy. Progression-free survival and overall survival were used to determine outcomes.
Results: We included 18 studies involving 1151 patients. Combination therapy improved outcomes: ICI plus antiangiogenic therapy versus ICI monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-1.52) and ICI plus chemotherapy versus ICI monotherapy (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32-0.65). Predictive genetic factors included atypical versus classical EGFR mutations (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32-0.64) and exon 21 L858R versus exon 19 deletions (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40-0.71). Favorable biomarkers included low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; HR = 1.90, 95% CI: 1.16-3.11) and positive programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35-0.96). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS) was associated with poor outcomes (HR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.37-3.01). Age, sex, smoking status, and histological subtype exhibited weaker or nonsignificant associations.
Conclusion: Patients with atypical EGFR or L858R mutations, high PD-L1 expression, low NLR, and good ECOG-PS are more likely to benefit from ICI therapy. Combining ICIs with chemotherapy or antiangiogenic agents enhances efficacy. Younger age, smoking history, and squamous cell carcinoma may also associate with improved outcomes, but further validation is required.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.