covid -19相关隔离的长期心理影响:挪威和冰岛三个队列的观察性研究

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Li Lu, Yue Wang, Omid V Ebrahimi, Qing Shen, Anna Bára Unnarsdóttir, Arna Hauksdóttir, Asle Hoffart, Edda Bjork Thordardottir, Ingibjörg Magnúsdóttir, Jóhanna Jakobsdóttir, Lill Trogstad, Thor Aspelund, Fang Fang, Ragnhild E Brandlistuen, Sverre Urnes Johnson, Unnur Anna Valdimarsdóttir, Ole A Andreassen, Helga Ask
{"title":"covid -19相关隔离的长期心理影响:挪威和冰岛三个队列的观察性研究","authors":"Li Lu, Yue Wang, Omid V Ebrahimi, Qing Shen, Anna Bára Unnarsdóttir, Arna Hauksdóttir, Asle Hoffart, Edda Bjork Thordardottir, Ingibjörg Magnúsdóttir, Jóhanna Jakobsdóttir, Lill Trogstad, Thor Aspelund, Fang Fang, Ragnhild E Brandlistuen, Sverre Urnes Johnson, Unnur Anna Valdimarsdóttir, Ole A Andreassen, Helga Ask","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04349-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Longitudinal assessments of psychological effects related to length and recency of quarantine experience in general populations are of importance. We aim to investigate if recency and duration of quarantine exposures during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with mental health, across subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included three prospective cohorts from Iceland and Norway with data on quarantine and symptoms of depression and anxiety from March 2020 to March 2022. We calculated prevalence ratios (PR) of probable depression and anxiety in relation to quarantine exposure, and performed longitudinal analyses in a subpopulation with repeated assessments to test the potential change in mental health burden due to quarantine over time while controlling for current quarantine status and other covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 105,344 and 94,435 individuals were included in the analysis of probable depression and anxiety, respectively, with 18.2% and 40.0% reporting quarantine exposure before the most recent assessment of corresponding mental health symptoms. Overall, quarantine exposure was associated with probable depression (PR 1.19 [95% CI: 0.99-1.42]) and anxiety (PR 1.21 [1.08-1.36]). Compared to individuals without quarantine, being exposed to quarantine for 0-2, 2-4, or > 4 weeks was associated with incrementally higher prevalence of probable depression (PR 1.15 [0.93-1.43]; 1.34 [1.06-1.68]; 1.72 [1.35-2.18], respectively) and probable anxiety (PR 1.12 [1.01-1.23]; 1.28 [1.14-1.45]; 1.76 [1.56-1.98]) in a step-wise manner; those who were quarantined within the last 2 weeks, last 2-4 weeks, or earlier showed a higher prevalence of probable depression in a dose-response manner (PR 1.62 [1.32-1.99], 1.32 [1.07-1.63], and 1.23 [1.06-1.43], respectively). The prevalence of probable anxiety did not appear to differ by the recency of quarantine. The longitudinal analyses (mean follow-up: 20.5 months) confirmed significantly higher prevalence of probable depression but only among those who were quarantined for > 4 weeks (PR 1.61 [1.30-2.00]), and of probable anxiety among those quarantined 2-4 weeks (PR 1.29 [1.14-1.45]) and > 4 weeks (PR 1.56 [1.34-1.82]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the importance of monitoring mental well-being of populations recently quarantined, particularly those quarantined for prolonged periods. Greater emphasis should be placed on the detrimental psychological effects in the risk-cost-benefit analysis of quarantine as a mitigation strategy in future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"519"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term psychological effects of COVID-19-related quarantine: an observational study of three cohorts in Norway and Iceland.\",\"authors\":\"Li Lu, Yue Wang, Omid V Ebrahimi, Qing Shen, Anna Bára Unnarsdóttir, Arna Hauksdóttir, Asle Hoffart, Edda Bjork Thordardottir, Ingibjörg Magnúsdóttir, Jóhanna Jakobsdóttir, Lill Trogstad, Thor Aspelund, Fang Fang, Ragnhild E Brandlistuen, Sverre Urnes Johnson, Unnur Anna Valdimarsdóttir, Ole A Andreassen, Helga Ask\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12916-025-04349-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Longitudinal assessments of psychological effects related to length and recency of quarantine experience in general populations are of importance. We aim to investigate if recency and duration of quarantine exposures during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with mental health, across subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included three prospective cohorts from Iceland and Norway with data on quarantine and symptoms of depression and anxiety from March 2020 to March 2022. We calculated prevalence ratios (PR) of probable depression and anxiety in relation to quarantine exposure, and performed longitudinal analyses in a subpopulation with repeated assessments to test the potential change in mental health burden due to quarantine over time while controlling for current quarantine status and other covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 105,344 and 94,435 individuals were included in the analysis of probable depression and anxiety, respectively, with 18.2% and 40.0% reporting quarantine exposure before the most recent assessment of corresponding mental health symptoms. Overall, quarantine exposure was associated with probable depression (PR 1.19 [95% CI: 0.99-1.42]) and anxiety (PR 1.21 [1.08-1.36]). Compared to individuals without quarantine, being exposed to quarantine for 0-2, 2-4, or > 4 weeks was associated with incrementally higher prevalence of probable depression (PR 1.15 [0.93-1.43]; 1.34 [1.06-1.68]; 1.72 [1.35-2.18], respectively) and probable anxiety (PR 1.12 [1.01-1.23]; 1.28 [1.14-1.45]; 1.76 [1.56-1.98]) in a step-wise manner; those who were quarantined within the last 2 weeks, last 2-4 weeks, or earlier showed a higher prevalence of probable depression in a dose-response manner (PR 1.62 [1.32-1.99], 1.32 [1.07-1.63], and 1.23 [1.06-1.43], respectively). The prevalence of probable anxiety did not appear to differ by the recency of quarantine. The longitudinal analyses (mean follow-up: 20.5 months) confirmed significantly higher prevalence of probable depression but only among those who were quarantined for > 4 weeks (PR 1.61 [1.30-2.00]), and of probable anxiety among those quarantined 2-4 weeks (PR 1.29 [1.14-1.45]) and > 4 weeks (PR 1.56 [1.34-1.82]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the importance of monitoring mental well-being of populations recently quarantined, particularly those quarantined for prolonged periods. Greater emphasis should be placed on the detrimental psychological effects in the risk-cost-benefit analysis of quarantine as a mitigation strategy in future pandemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465783/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04349-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04349-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对普通人群中与隔离时间长短和时间间隔有关的心理影响进行纵向评估是很重要的。我们的目标是调查在COVID-19大流行期间隔离暴露的最近次数和持续时间是否与亚组的心理健康有关。方法:我们纳入了来自冰岛和挪威的三个前瞻性队列,收集了2020年3月至2022年3月期间的隔离以及抑郁和焦虑症状的数据。我们计算了与隔离暴露相关的可能的抑郁和焦虑的患病率(PR),并在一个亚人群中进行了纵向分析,并进行了重复评估,以在控制当前隔离状态和其他协变量的同时,测试因隔离而导致的心理健康负担随时间的潜在变化。结果:总共有105344人和94435人分别被纳入可能的抑郁和焦虑分析,其中18.2%和40.0%的人在最近一次相应的心理健康症状评估之前报告了隔离暴露。总体而言,隔离暴露与可能的抑郁(PR = 1.19 [95% CI: 0.99-1.42])和焦虑(PR = 1.21[1.08-1.36])相关。与未隔离的个体相比,暴露于隔离0-2周、2-4周或4- 4周的个体可能出现抑郁(PR分别为1.15[0.93-1.43]、1.34[1.06-1.68]、1.72[1.35-2.18])和可能出现焦虑(PR为1.12[1.01-1.23]、1.28[1.14-1.45]、1.76[1.56-1.98])的患病率呈逐步升高趋势;在最近2周、最近2-4周或更早被隔离的人群中,可能出现抑郁症的患病率在剂量-反应方式上较高(PR分别为1.62[1.32-1.99]、1.32[1.07-1.63]和1.23[1.06-1.43])。疑似焦虑症的流行程度似乎并没有因隔离时间的远近而有所不同。纵向分析(平均随访时间:20.5个月)证实,抑郁症的患病率明显较高,但仅在隔离40周的人群中(比例比1.61[1.30-2.00]),隔离2-4周的人群中(比例比1.29[1.14-1.45])和隔离4周的人群中(比例比1.56[1.34-1.82]),可能存在焦虑。结论:这项研究强调了监测最近被隔离人群心理健康状况的重要性,特别是那些被长期隔离的人群。在风险-成本-效益分析中将隔离作为未来流行病的缓解战略时,应更加强调有害的心理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Long-term psychological effects of COVID-19-related quarantine: an observational study of three cohorts in Norway and Iceland.

Long-term psychological effects of COVID-19-related quarantine: an observational study of three cohorts in Norway and Iceland.

Long-term psychological effects of COVID-19-related quarantine: an observational study of three cohorts in Norway and Iceland.

Long-term psychological effects of COVID-19-related quarantine: an observational study of three cohorts in Norway and Iceland.

Background: Longitudinal assessments of psychological effects related to length and recency of quarantine experience in general populations are of importance. We aim to investigate if recency and duration of quarantine exposures during the COVID-19 pandemic were associated with mental health, across subgroups.

Methods: We included three prospective cohorts from Iceland and Norway with data on quarantine and symptoms of depression and anxiety from March 2020 to March 2022. We calculated prevalence ratios (PR) of probable depression and anxiety in relation to quarantine exposure, and performed longitudinal analyses in a subpopulation with repeated assessments to test the potential change in mental health burden due to quarantine over time while controlling for current quarantine status and other covariates.

Results: In total, 105,344 and 94,435 individuals were included in the analysis of probable depression and anxiety, respectively, with 18.2% and 40.0% reporting quarantine exposure before the most recent assessment of corresponding mental health symptoms. Overall, quarantine exposure was associated with probable depression (PR 1.19 [95% CI: 0.99-1.42]) and anxiety (PR 1.21 [1.08-1.36]). Compared to individuals without quarantine, being exposed to quarantine for 0-2, 2-4, or > 4 weeks was associated with incrementally higher prevalence of probable depression (PR 1.15 [0.93-1.43]; 1.34 [1.06-1.68]; 1.72 [1.35-2.18], respectively) and probable anxiety (PR 1.12 [1.01-1.23]; 1.28 [1.14-1.45]; 1.76 [1.56-1.98]) in a step-wise manner; those who were quarantined within the last 2 weeks, last 2-4 weeks, or earlier showed a higher prevalence of probable depression in a dose-response manner (PR 1.62 [1.32-1.99], 1.32 [1.07-1.63], and 1.23 [1.06-1.43], respectively). The prevalence of probable anxiety did not appear to differ by the recency of quarantine. The longitudinal analyses (mean follow-up: 20.5 months) confirmed significantly higher prevalence of probable depression but only among those who were quarantined for > 4 weeks (PR 1.61 [1.30-2.00]), and of probable anxiety among those quarantined 2-4 weeks (PR 1.29 [1.14-1.45]) and > 4 weeks (PR 1.56 [1.34-1.82]).

Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of monitoring mental well-being of populations recently quarantined, particularly those quarantined for prolonged periods. Greater emphasis should be placed on the detrimental psychological effects in the risk-cost-benefit analysis of quarantine as a mitigation strategy in future pandemics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信