利用Δ-Machine学习改进多时间步长QM/MM仿真。

IF 2.9 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Reilly Osadchey, , , Kwangho Nam*, , and , Qiang Cui*, 
{"title":"利用Δ-Machine学习改进多时间步长QM/MM仿真。","authors":"Reilly Osadchey,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Kwangho Nam*,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Qiang Cui*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c05255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Semiempirical methods are popular for QM/MM simulations of chemical reactions in the condensed phase due to their immense speedup compared to higher-level <i>ab initio</i> or density functional theory (DFT) methods but can be much less accurate depending on the system of interest. Multiple time step (MTS) methods can improve the accuracy of semiempirical QM/MM simulations by using higher-level calculations at less frequent outer time steps, yet accurate results and efficient sampling require the low- and high-level methods to be sufficiently similar. In this work, we show the limitations of standard semiempirical methods (e.g., AM1) for MTS applications. In a condensed-phase reaction of proton transfer from water to methyl phosphate, for which DFT (B3LYP) is used as the high-level method, we can only reach an outer time step of 4, even with the stochastic isokinetic thermostat. We then explore the value of employing Δ-machine learning to enhance the efficiency of MTS QM/MM simulations. As an initial step, we train neural network potentials and Δ-learning corrections to the AM1 method for the corresponding gas-phase reaction. We show that Δ-corrections outperform ML potentials and that the amount of training data has a major impact on the accuracy and transferability of the learned correction. In a gas-phase MTS simulation with appropriate machine-learned Δ-corrections, we can reach an outer integration frequency of 25 for a nearly exact result compared to B3LYP and 30 if we accept an error of 0.3 kcal·mol<sup>–1</sup> for the free energy profile. The study validates and provides guidance to Δ-learning based MTS simulations, setting the stage for future development and realistic applications in the condensed phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":60,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","volume":"129 40","pages":"10451–10466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward Improving Multiple Time Step QM/MM Simulations with Δ-Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Reilly Osadchey,&nbsp;, ,&nbsp;Kwangho Nam*,&nbsp;, and ,&nbsp;Qiang Cui*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c05255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Semiempirical methods are popular for QM/MM simulations of chemical reactions in the condensed phase due to their immense speedup compared to higher-level <i>ab initio</i> or density functional theory (DFT) methods but can be much less accurate depending on the system of interest. Multiple time step (MTS) methods can improve the accuracy of semiempirical QM/MM simulations by using higher-level calculations at less frequent outer time steps, yet accurate results and efficient sampling require the low- and high-level methods to be sufficiently similar. In this work, we show the limitations of standard semiempirical methods (e.g., AM1) for MTS applications. In a condensed-phase reaction of proton transfer from water to methyl phosphate, for which DFT (B3LYP) is used as the high-level method, we can only reach an outer time step of 4, even with the stochastic isokinetic thermostat. We then explore the value of employing Δ-machine learning to enhance the efficiency of MTS QM/MM simulations. As an initial step, we train neural network potentials and Δ-learning corrections to the AM1 method for the corresponding gas-phase reaction. We show that Δ-corrections outperform ML potentials and that the amount of training data has a major impact on the accuracy and transferability of the learned correction. In a gas-phase MTS simulation with appropriate machine-learned Δ-corrections, we can reach an outer integration frequency of 25 for a nearly exact result compared to B3LYP and 30 if we accept an error of 0.3 kcal·mol<sup>–1</sup> for the free energy profile. The study validates and provides guidance to Δ-learning based MTS simulations, setting the stage for future development and realistic applications in the condensed phase.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":60,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B\",\"volume\":\"129 40\",\"pages\":\"10451–10466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c05255\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c05255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

半经验方法在凝聚态化学反应的QM/MM模拟中很受欢迎,因为与更高水平的从头算或密度泛函数理论(DFT)方法相比,它们具有巨大的加速,但根据感兴趣的系统,它们的准确性可能会低得多。多时间步长(MTS)方法可以通过在较不频繁的外部时间步长上使用更高级别的计算来提高半经验QM/MM模拟的精度,但准确的结果和有效的采样要求低级和高级方法足够相似。在这项工作中,我们展示了标准半经验方法(例如AM1)在MTS应用中的局限性。在质子从水转移到磷酸甲酯的凝聚相反应中,使用DFT (B3LYP)作为高级方法,即使使用随机等速恒温器,我们也只能达到4的外部时间步长。然后,我们探讨了使用Δ-machine学习来提高MTS QM/MM模拟效率的价值。作为第一步,我们训练了相应气相反应的AM1方法的神经网络电位和Δ-learning修正。我们表明Δ-corrections优于ML潜力,并且训练数据的数量对学习纠正的准确性和可转移性有重大影响。在适当的机器学习Δ-corrections的气相MTS模拟中,与B3LYP相比,我们可以达到接近精确结果的外部积分频率为25,如果我们接受0.3 kcal·mol-1的自由能分布误差,则可以达到30。该研究验证并提供了基于Δ-learning的MTS模拟的指导,为未来的发展和浓缩阶段的实际应用奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Toward Improving Multiple Time Step QM/MM Simulations with Δ-Machine Learning

Toward Improving Multiple Time Step QM/MM Simulations with Δ-Machine Learning

Semiempirical methods are popular for QM/MM simulations of chemical reactions in the condensed phase due to their immense speedup compared to higher-level ab initio or density functional theory (DFT) methods but can be much less accurate depending on the system of interest. Multiple time step (MTS) methods can improve the accuracy of semiempirical QM/MM simulations by using higher-level calculations at less frequent outer time steps, yet accurate results and efficient sampling require the low- and high-level methods to be sufficiently similar. In this work, we show the limitations of standard semiempirical methods (e.g., AM1) for MTS applications. In a condensed-phase reaction of proton transfer from water to methyl phosphate, for which DFT (B3LYP) is used as the high-level method, we can only reach an outer time step of 4, even with the stochastic isokinetic thermostat. We then explore the value of employing Δ-machine learning to enhance the efficiency of MTS QM/MM simulations. As an initial step, we train neural network potentials and Δ-learning corrections to the AM1 method for the corresponding gas-phase reaction. We show that Δ-corrections outperform ML potentials and that the amount of training data has a major impact on the accuracy and transferability of the learned correction. In a gas-phase MTS simulation with appropriate machine-learned Δ-corrections, we can reach an outer integration frequency of 25 for a nearly exact result compared to B3LYP and 30 if we accept an error of 0.3 kcal·mol–1 for the free energy profile. The study validates and provides guidance to Δ-learning based MTS simulations, setting the stage for future development and realistic applications in the condensed phase.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
965
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: An essential criterion for acceptance of research articles in the journal is that they provide new physical insight. Please refer to the New Physical Insights virtual issue on what constitutes new physical insight. Manuscripts that are essentially reporting data or applications of data are, in general, not suitable for publication in JPC B.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信