力场极化对蛋白质相关运动的影响。

IF 2.9 2区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Ana Milinski, Annick Dejaegere, Roland H Stote
{"title":"力场极化对蛋白质相关运动的影响。","authors":"Ana Milinski, Annick Dejaegere, Roland H Stote","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c03537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Correlated motions of proteins underpin many physiological mechanisms, such as substrate binding, signal transduction, enzymatic activity, and allostery. These motions arise from low-frequency collective movements of biomolecules and have mostly been studied using molecular dynamics simulations. Here, we present the effects of two different empirical energy force fields used for molecular dynamics simulations on correlated motions─the nonpolarizable CHARMM36m additive force field and the polarizable Drude-2019 force field. The study was conducted on two proteins, ubiquitin─a small protein with well-described dynamics─and the nuclear receptor protein─peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). The ligand binding domain of PPARγ was of particular interest since its function is to regulate transcription through ligand and coregulator protein binding. It has been previously shown that a dynamical network of correlated motions ensures the transmission of information related to PPARγ ligand binding. We present the results of classical MD simulations where we analyze the results in terms of residue fluctuations, residue correlation maps, community network analysis, and hydrophobic cluster analysis. We find that RMS fluctuations tend to be greater and correlated motions are less intense with the Drude-2019 force field than with the nonpolarizable all atom additive force field. Analysis of large hydrophobic clusters in the respective proteins shows a greater loss of native contacts in the simulations using the Drude-2019 force field than in the simulations using the all atom additive force field. Our results provide the first quantification of the impact of using a polarizable force field in computational studies that focus on correlated motions.</p>","PeriodicalId":60,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Force Field Polarization on Correlated Motions of Proteins.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Milinski, Annick Dejaegere, Roland H Stote\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c03537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Correlated motions of proteins underpin many physiological mechanisms, such as substrate binding, signal transduction, enzymatic activity, and allostery. These motions arise from low-frequency collective movements of biomolecules and have mostly been studied using molecular dynamics simulations. Here, we present the effects of two different empirical energy force fields used for molecular dynamics simulations on correlated motions─the nonpolarizable CHARMM36m additive force field and the polarizable Drude-2019 force field. The study was conducted on two proteins, ubiquitin─a small protein with well-described dynamics─and the nuclear receptor protein─peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). The ligand binding domain of PPARγ was of particular interest since its function is to regulate transcription through ligand and coregulator protein binding. It has been previously shown that a dynamical network of correlated motions ensures the transmission of information related to PPARγ ligand binding. We present the results of classical MD simulations where we analyze the results in terms of residue fluctuations, residue correlation maps, community network analysis, and hydrophobic cluster analysis. We find that RMS fluctuations tend to be greater and correlated motions are less intense with the Drude-2019 force field than with the nonpolarizable all atom additive force field. Analysis of large hydrophobic clusters in the respective proteins shows a greater loss of native contacts in the simulations using the Drude-2019 force field than in the simulations using the all atom additive force field. Our results provide the first quantification of the impact of using a polarizable force field in computational studies that focus on correlated motions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":60,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c03537\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c03537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蛋白质的相关运动支持许多生理机制,如底物结合、信号转导、酶活性和变构。这些运动源于生物分子的低频集体运动,大多是用分子动力学模拟来研究的。在这里,我们展示了用于分子动力学模拟的两种不同的经验能量力场对相关运动的影响──非极化的CHARMM36m加性力场和极化的Drude-2019力场。这项研究是在两种蛋白质上进行的,一种是泛素(ubiquitin)──一种具有良好动力学描述的小蛋白质──和核受体蛋白──过氧化物酶体增殖体活化受体γ (PPARγ)。PPARγ的配体结合结构域特别令人感兴趣,因为它的功能是通过配体和共调节蛋白结合来调节转录。先前的研究表明,相关运动的动态网络确保了PPARγ配体结合相关信息的传递。我们给出了经典MD模拟的结果,我们从残差波动、残差相关图、社区网络分析和疏水聚类分析等方面分析了结果。我们发现,与非极化全原子加性力场相比,德鲁德-2019力场的均方根波动更大,相关运动也更弱。对各自蛋白质中的大型疏水团簇的分析表明,使用Drude-2019力场的模拟比使用全原子加性力场的模拟损失更大。我们的研究结果首次量化了在相关运动的计算研究中使用极化力场的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Force Field Polarization on Correlated Motions of Proteins.

Correlated motions of proteins underpin many physiological mechanisms, such as substrate binding, signal transduction, enzymatic activity, and allostery. These motions arise from low-frequency collective movements of biomolecules and have mostly been studied using molecular dynamics simulations. Here, we present the effects of two different empirical energy force fields used for molecular dynamics simulations on correlated motions─the nonpolarizable CHARMM36m additive force field and the polarizable Drude-2019 force field. The study was conducted on two proteins, ubiquitin─a small protein with well-described dynamics─and the nuclear receptor protein─peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). The ligand binding domain of PPARγ was of particular interest since its function is to regulate transcription through ligand and coregulator protein binding. It has been previously shown that a dynamical network of correlated motions ensures the transmission of information related to PPARγ ligand binding. We present the results of classical MD simulations where we analyze the results in terms of residue fluctuations, residue correlation maps, community network analysis, and hydrophobic cluster analysis. We find that RMS fluctuations tend to be greater and correlated motions are less intense with the Drude-2019 force field than with the nonpolarizable all atom additive force field. Analysis of large hydrophobic clusters in the respective proteins shows a greater loss of native contacts in the simulations using the Drude-2019 force field than in the simulations using the all atom additive force field. Our results provide the first quantification of the impact of using a polarizable force field in computational studies that focus on correlated motions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
965
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: An essential criterion for acceptance of research articles in the journal is that they provide new physical insight. Please refer to the New Physical Insights virtual issue on what constitutes new physical insight. Manuscripts that are essentially reporting data or applications of data are, in general, not suitable for publication in JPC B.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信