水溶性槲皮素3-O-rutinoside的微生物学和药代动力学方面:槲皮素在体外和人体临床研究中的直接比较

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Naoto Yamaguchi, Yui Sudaka, Takafumi Mitsui, Ryohei Nakaguro, Misa Saito, Hiroaki Kida, Mitsunori Ono
{"title":"水溶性槲皮素3-O-rutinoside的微生物学和药代动力学方面:槲皮素在体外和人体临床研究中的直接比较","authors":"Naoto Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Yui Sudaka,&nbsp;Takafumi Mitsui,&nbsp;Ryohei Nakaguro,&nbsp;Misa Saito,&nbsp;Hiroaki Kida,&nbsp;Mitsunori Ono","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (Q3R) is a bioflavonoid characterized by the attachment of rutinose, an indigestible disaccharide, to quercetin. EubioQuercetin is a standardized Q3R formulation with improved water solubility. This study aimed to clarify the similarities and differences between EubioQuercetin, Q3R, and conventional quercetin by comparing their microbiological and pharmacokinetic properties. Fecal microbiota analyses showed that the addition of EubioQuercetin significantly increased <i>Blautia</i> and <i>[Ruminococcus] gnavus</i> groups (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.05) and significantly decreased <i>Faecalibacterium</i> and deoxycholic acid (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.05). Correlation analysis of intestinal bacteria showed a significant positive correlation between the relative abundance of <i>Fusicatenibacter</i> and Christensenellaceae R-7 group before the addition of EubioQuercetin and its fold change before and after the addition of EubioQuercetin. In a randomized, open-label, two-sequence/two-period crossover clinical trial, the eight major blood metabolites and their blood abundance ratios showed almost the same tendency between EubioQuercetin and quercetin, with or without rutinose. The pK profile of EubioQuercetin showed a 5-fold increase in <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> and a 4–5-fold increase in AUC<sub>last</sub> compared with those of quercetin; the <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> was 2–3 times longer; the <i>t</i><sub>1/2</sub> was more than 2-fold longer after 4 weeks of continuous administration. A similar trend to that observed in the in vitro human fecal microbiota assay was seen, with increased fluctuations in intestinal bacterial composition following 4 weeks of EubioQuercetin consumption. Preliminary findings indicate that the increased water solubility of EubioQuercetin promotes catabolic and metabolic reactions in intestinal bacteria, and that the tendency of intestinal bacteria to fluctuate is different from that of conventional quercetin.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological and Pharmacokinetic Aspects of a Water-Soluble Quercetin 3-O-rutinoside, EubioQuercetin: A Direct Comparison With Quercetin in In Vitro and Human Clinical Studies\",\"authors\":\"Naoto Yamaguchi,&nbsp;Yui Sudaka,&nbsp;Takafumi Mitsui,&nbsp;Ryohei Nakaguro,&nbsp;Misa Saito,&nbsp;Hiroaki Kida,&nbsp;Mitsunori Ono\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1750-3841.70579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (Q3R) is a bioflavonoid characterized by the attachment of rutinose, an indigestible disaccharide, to quercetin. EubioQuercetin is a standardized Q3R formulation with improved water solubility. This study aimed to clarify the similarities and differences between EubioQuercetin, Q3R, and conventional quercetin by comparing their microbiological and pharmacokinetic properties. Fecal microbiota analyses showed that the addition of EubioQuercetin significantly increased <i>Blautia</i> and <i>[Ruminococcus] gnavus</i> groups (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.05) and significantly decreased <i>Faecalibacterium</i> and deoxycholic acid (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.05). Correlation analysis of intestinal bacteria showed a significant positive correlation between the relative abundance of <i>Fusicatenibacter</i> and Christensenellaceae R-7 group before the addition of EubioQuercetin and its fold change before and after the addition of EubioQuercetin. In a randomized, open-label, two-sequence/two-period crossover clinical trial, the eight major blood metabolites and their blood abundance ratios showed almost the same tendency between EubioQuercetin and quercetin, with or without rutinose. The pK profile of EubioQuercetin showed a 5-fold increase in <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> and a 4–5-fold increase in AUC<sub>last</sub> compared with those of quercetin; the <i>T</i><sub>max</sub> was 2–3 times longer; the <i>t</i><sub>1/2</sub> was more than 2-fold longer after 4 weeks of continuous administration. A similar trend to that observed in the in vitro human fecal microbiota assay was seen, with increased fluctuations in intestinal bacterial composition following 4 weeks of EubioQuercetin consumption. Preliminary findings indicate that the increased water solubility of EubioQuercetin promotes catabolic and metabolic reactions in intestinal bacteria, and that the tendency of intestinal bacteria to fluctuate is different from that of conventional quercetin.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"volume\":\"90 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70579\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

槲皮素-3- o -rutinoside (Q3R)是一种生物类黄酮,其特征是槲皮素附着在一种不可消化的双糖rutinose上。槲皮素是一种标准的Q3R制剂,具有改善的水溶性。本研究旨在通过比较槲皮素、Q3R和传统槲皮素的微生物学和药动学性质,阐明它们之间的异同。粪便微生物群分析显示,添加真生物槲皮素显著增加了蓝杆菌群和鲁米诺球菌群(p < 0.05),显著降低了粪杆菌群和脱氧胆酸群(p < 0.05)。肠道细菌相关分析显示,添加eubiquercetin前Fusicatenibacter和Christensenellaceae R-7组的相对丰度与其添加eubiquercetin前后的折叠变化呈显著正相关。在一项随机、开放标签、两序列/两期的交叉临床试验中,EubioQuercetin和槲皮素在加或不加芦丁糖的情况下,8种主要血液代谢物及其血液丰度比呈现几乎相同的趋势。槲皮素的pK谱显示,与槲皮素相比,Cmax增加了5倍,AUClast增加了4 - 5倍;Tmax延长2-3倍;连续给药4周后,t1/2延长了2倍多。与在体外人类粪便微生物群测定中观察到的趋势相似,在服用eubi槲皮素4周后,肠道细菌组成的波动增加。初步结果表明,槲皮素水溶性的提高促进了肠道细菌的分解代谢反应,肠道细菌的波动倾向与常规槲皮素不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Microbiological and Pharmacokinetic Aspects of a Water-Soluble Quercetin 3-O-rutinoside, EubioQuercetin: A Direct Comparison With Quercetin in In Vitro and Human Clinical Studies

Microbiological and Pharmacokinetic Aspects of a Water-Soluble Quercetin 3-O-rutinoside, EubioQuercetin: A Direct Comparison With Quercetin in In Vitro and Human Clinical Studies

Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (Q3R) is a bioflavonoid characterized by the attachment of rutinose, an indigestible disaccharide, to quercetin. EubioQuercetin is a standardized Q3R formulation with improved water solubility. This study aimed to clarify the similarities and differences between EubioQuercetin, Q3R, and conventional quercetin by comparing their microbiological and pharmacokinetic properties. Fecal microbiota analyses showed that the addition of EubioQuercetin significantly increased Blautia and [Ruminococcus] gnavus groups (p < 0.05) and significantly decreased Faecalibacterium and deoxycholic acid (p < 0.05). Correlation analysis of intestinal bacteria showed a significant positive correlation between the relative abundance of Fusicatenibacter and Christensenellaceae R-7 group before the addition of EubioQuercetin and its fold change before and after the addition of EubioQuercetin. In a randomized, open-label, two-sequence/two-period crossover clinical trial, the eight major blood metabolites and their blood abundance ratios showed almost the same tendency between EubioQuercetin and quercetin, with or without rutinose. The pK profile of EubioQuercetin showed a 5-fold increase in Cmax and a 4–5-fold increase in AUClast compared with those of quercetin; the Tmax was 2–3 times longer; the t1/2 was more than 2-fold longer after 4 weeks of continuous administration. A similar trend to that observed in the in vitro human fecal microbiota assay was seen, with increased fluctuations in intestinal bacterial composition following 4 weeks of EubioQuercetin consumption. Preliminary findings indicate that the increased water solubility of EubioQuercetin promotes catabolic and metabolic reactions in intestinal bacteria, and that the tendency of intestinal bacteria to fluctuate is different from that of conventional quercetin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信