Julie Semenchuk, Eliza Tuff-Gordon, Xiayi Ma, Jenna Sykes, Stephanie Y. Cheng, Meghan Aversa, Cecilia Chaparro, Elizabeth Tullis, Anne L. Stephenson
{"title":"在Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor时代不断变化的移植景观:一个警告","authors":"Julie Semenchuk, Eliza Tuff-Gordon, Xiayi Ma, Jenna Sykes, Stephanie Y. Cheng, Meghan Aversa, Cecilia Chaparro, Elizabeth Tullis, Anne L. Stephenson","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has dramatically changed the landscape of cystic fibrosis (CF) care, including in those who require lung transplantation. The objectives of the study were to describe the cohort demographics and outcomes of primary lung transplant recipients before and after the availability of ETI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This is a descriptive study of lung transplants performed at the Toronto Lung Transplant Program for CF during two time periods: 2019 (pre-ETI era) and 2021–2023 (post-ETI era). All subjects were referred from the Adult CF program at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto. Data were obtained from chart review and the Toronto Lung Transplant database. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival probability at 1 year post-transplant.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were 22 lung transplants performed in 2019 (19 [86.4%] primary and 3 [13.6%] re-transplants) compared to 11 lung transplants (8 [72.7%] primary and 3 [27.3%] re-transplants) in the post-ETI era. In primary transplant recipients, median age was 29.4 years (Range 18.6–67.6 years) in 2019 compared to 30.0 years (Range 19.1–64.0 years) in 2021–2023. In the post-ETI era, none of the individuals had a deltaF508 variant, compared to 84% in 2019. One-year survival probability was lower in the post-ETI era (62.5% vs. 84.2%, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Lung transplant recipients in the post-ETI era were more complex with high-risk characteristics and had worse post-transplant outcomes. This study highlights the importance of further investigation to better understand the impact of ETI on transplant referral patterns, recipient characteristics, and post-transplant outcomes in the CF population.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70317","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Changing Transplant Landscape in the Era of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor: A Word of Caution\",\"authors\":\"Julie Semenchuk, Eliza Tuff-Gordon, Xiayi Ma, Jenna Sykes, Stephanie Y. Cheng, Meghan Aversa, Cecilia Chaparro, Elizabeth Tullis, Anne L. Stephenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has dramatically changed the landscape of cystic fibrosis (CF) care, including in those who require lung transplantation. The objectives of the study were to describe the cohort demographics and outcomes of primary lung transplant recipients before and after the availability of ETI.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is a descriptive study of lung transplants performed at the Toronto Lung Transplant Program for CF during two time periods: 2019 (pre-ETI era) and 2021–2023 (post-ETI era). All subjects were referred from the Adult CF program at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto. Data were obtained from chart review and the Toronto Lung Transplant database. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival probability at 1 year post-transplant.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were 22 lung transplants performed in 2019 (19 [86.4%] primary and 3 [13.6%] re-transplants) compared to 11 lung transplants (8 [72.7%] primary and 3 [27.3%] re-transplants) in the post-ETI era. In primary transplant recipients, median age was 29.4 years (Range 18.6–67.6 years) in 2019 compared to 30.0 years (Range 19.1–64.0 years) in 2021–2023. In the post-ETI era, none of the individuals had a deltaF508 variant, compared to 84% in 2019. One-year survival probability was lower in the post-ETI era (62.5% vs. 84.2%, respectively).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lung transplant recipients in the post-ETI era were more complex with high-risk characteristics and had worse post-transplant outcomes. This study highlights the importance of further investigation to better understand the impact of ETI on transplant referral patterns, recipient characteristics, and post-transplant outcomes in the CF population.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"39 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70317\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70317\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Changing Transplant Landscape in the Era of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor: A Word of Caution
Background
Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has dramatically changed the landscape of cystic fibrosis (CF) care, including in those who require lung transplantation. The objectives of the study were to describe the cohort demographics and outcomes of primary lung transplant recipients before and after the availability of ETI.
Methods
This is a descriptive study of lung transplants performed at the Toronto Lung Transplant Program for CF during two time periods: 2019 (pre-ETI era) and 2021–2023 (post-ETI era). All subjects were referred from the Adult CF program at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto. Data were obtained from chart review and the Toronto Lung Transplant database. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate survival probability at 1 year post-transplant.
Results
There were 22 lung transplants performed in 2019 (19 [86.4%] primary and 3 [13.6%] re-transplants) compared to 11 lung transplants (8 [72.7%] primary and 3 [27.3%] re-transplants) in the post-ETI era. In primary transplant recipients, median age was 29.4 years (Range 18.6–67.6 years) in 2019 compared to 30.0 years (Range 19.1–64.0 years) in 2021–2023. In the post-ETI era, none of the individuals had a deltaF508 variant, compared to 84% in 2019. One-year survival probability was lower in the post-ETI era (62.5% vs. 84.2%, respectively).
Conclusion
Lung transplant recipients in the post-ETI era were more complex with high-risk characteristics and had worse post-transplant outcomes. This study highlights the importance of further investigation to better understand the impact of ETI on transplant referral patterns, recipient characteristics, and post-transplant outcomes in the CF population.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.