可变形剂量累积不确定性建模工具的最终用户验证方法

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-09-25 DOI:10.1002/mp.18094
John Kipritidis, Alexandra Quinn, Tomasz Morgas, Sven Kuckertz, Nils Papenberg, Stefan Heldmann, Nasim Givehchi, Thomas Coradi, Jeremy T. Booth
{"title":"可变形剂量累积不确定性建模工具的最终用户验证方法","authors":"John Kipritidis,&nbsp;Alexandra Quinn,&nbsp;Tomasz Morgas,&nbsp;Sven Kuckertz,&nbsp;Nils Papenberg,&nbsp;Stefan Heldmann,&nbsp;Nasim Givehchi,&nbsp;Thomas Coradi,&nbsp;Jeremy T. Booth","doi":"10.1002/mp.18094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Deformable dose accumulation (DDA) uncertainty models can inform treatment decisions by communicating the dosimetric impact of deformable image registration (DIR) errors over multiple fractions. Currently there is limited guidance on how end-users can validate such models in the clinic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>We propose an end-user validation sequence for DDA uncertainty modelling tools, akin to an acceptance test, using existing patient data and a clinical treatment planning system (TPS) as the evaluation platform.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The proposed test sequence begins with a single “fixed” image (planning CT with associated contours and treatment plan) and a “moving” image (e.g., fractional synthetic CT with calculated dose) and uses the TPS to simulate multiple fractional DIRs as input to a DDA uncertainty model. Outputs of the uncertainty tool—including volumetric images of DIR spatial uncertainties, and associated uncertainties on propagated dose—are imported back to the TPS and a series of visual and semi-quantitative (point-based and DVH-based) cross-checks are carried out. Emphasis is placed on the use of standard dose and distance measurement tools, in conjunction with vendor-provided equations, to evaluate correctness of the uncertainty tool outputs at contour boundaries and in bulk tissue, considering variable DIR quality for both targets and organs at risk.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The test sequence is demonstrated for a non-clinical uncertainty tool using a clinical bladder case. Agreement within 2 voxels (for spatial uncertainties) and up to 5% of the prescribed dose (for dose uncertainties) is shown to be achievable for regions of plausible deformation and stable dose gradient (e.g., &lt; 5%/voxel).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>As the use of DDA in adaptive treatment becomes more commonplace, use of DDA uncertainty tools will become increasingly important to inform adaptive treatment decisions. This work represents an important effort to formalize an end-user validation process using standardly available clinical tools.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Method for end-user validation of deformable dose accumulation uncertainty modelling tools\",\"authors\":\"John Kipritidis,&nbsp;Alexandra Quinn,&nbsp;Tomasz Morgas,&nbsp;Sven Kuckertz,&nbsp;Nils Papenberg,&nbsp;Stefan Heldmann,&nbsp;Nasim Givehchi,&nbsp;Thomas Coradi,&nbsp;Jeremy T. Booth\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.18094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Deformable dose accumulation (DDA) uncertainty models can inform treatment decisions by communicating the dosimetric impact of deformable image registration (DIR) errors over multiple fractions. Currently there is limited guidance on how end-users can validate such models in the clinic.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>We propose an end-user validation sequence for DDA uncertainty modelling tools, akin to an acceptance test, using existing patient data and a clinical treatment planning system (TPS) as the evaluation platform.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The proposed test sequence begins with a single “fixed” image (planning CT with associated contours and treatment plan) and a “moving” image (e.g., fractional synthetic CT with calculated dose) and uses the TPS to simulate multiple fractional DIRs as input to a DDA uncertainty model. Outputs of the uncertainty tool—including volumetric images of DIR spatial uncertainties, and associated uncertainties on propagated dose—are imported back to the TPS and a series of visual and semi-quantitative (point-based and DVH-based) cross-checks are carried out. Emphasis is placed on the use of standard dose and distance measurement tools, in conjunction with vendor-provided equations, to evaluate correctness of the uncertainty tool outputs at contour boundaries and in bulk tissue, considering variable DIR quality for both targets and organs at risk.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The test sequence is demonstrated for a non-clinical uncertainty tool using a clinical bladder case. Agreement within 2 voxels (for spatial uncertainties) and up to 5% of the prescribed dose (for dose uncertainties) is shown to be achievable for regions of plausible deformation and stable dose gradient (e.g., &lt; 5%/voxel).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>As the use of DDA in adaptive treatment becomes more commonplace, use of DDA uncertainty tools will become increasingly important to inform adaptive treatment decisions. This work represents an important effort to formalize an end-user validation process using standardly available clinical tools.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\"52 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.18094\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.18094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

变形剂量累积(DDA)不确定性模型可以通过在多个分数上传达变形图像配准(DIR)误差的剂量学影响来为治疗决策提供信息。目前,关于最终用户如何在临床验证这些模型的指导有限。我们提出了DDA不确定性建模工具的最终用户验证序列,类似于验收测试,使用现有患者数据和临床治疗计划系统(TPS)作为评估平台。所提出的测试序列从单个“固定”图像(具有相关轮廓和治疗计划的规划CT)和一个“移动”图像(例如,具有计算剂量的分数合成CT)开始,并使用TPS模拟多个分数DIRs作为DDA不确定性模型的输入。不确定度工具的输出——包括DIR空间不确定度的体积图像,以及传播剂量的相关不确定度——被导入TPS,并进行一系列视觉和半定量(基于点和基于dvh)交叉检查。重点是使用标准剂量和距离测量工具,结合供应商提供的方程,评估轮廓边界和大块组织中不确定性工具输出的正确性,同时考虑到目标和危险器官的可变DIR质量。结果该测试序列可用于临床膀胱病例的非临床不确定性工具。结果表明,对于合理变形和稳定剂量梯度(例如5%/体素)的区域,在2体素范围内(对于空间不确定性)和规定剂量的5%以内(对于剂量不确定性)是可以实现的。随着DDA在适应性治疗中的使用变得越来越普遍,DDA不确定性工具的使用将变得越来越重要,以告知适应性治疗决策。这项工作代表了使用标准可用的临床工具形式化最终用户验证过程的重要努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Method for end-user validation of deformable dose accumulation uncertainty modelling tools

Method for end-user validation of deformable dose accumulation uncertainty modelling tools

Background

Deformable dose accumulation (DDA) uncertainty models can inform treatment decisions by communicating the dosimetric impact of deformable image registration (DIR) errors over multiple fractions. Currently there is limited guidance on how end-users can validate such models in the clinic.

Purpose

We propose an end-user validation sequence for DDA uncertainty modelling tools, akin to an acceptance test, using existing patient data and a clinical treatment planning system (TPS) as the evaluation platform.

Methods

The proposed test sequence begins with a single “fixed” image (planning CT with associated contours and treatment plan) and a “moving” image (e.g., fractional synthetic CT with calculated dose) and uses the TPS to simulate multiple fractional DIRs as input to a DDA uncertainty model. Outputs of the uncertainty tool—including volumetric images of DIR spatial uncertainties, and associated uncertainties on propagated dose—are imported back to the TPS and a series of visual and semi-quantitative (point-based and DVH-based) cross-checks are carried out. Emphasis is placed on the use of standard dose and distance measurement tools, in conjunction with vendor-provided equations, to evaluate correctness of the uncertainty tool outputs at contour boundaries and in bulk tissue, considering variable DIR quality for both targets and organs at risk.

Results

The test sequence is demonstrated for a non-clinical uncertainty tool using a clinical bladder case. Agreement within 2 voxels (for spatial uncertainties) and up to 5% of the prescribed dose (for dose uncertainties) is shown to be achievable for regions of plausible deformation and stable dose gradient (e.g., < 5%/voxel).

Conclusions

As the use of DDA in adaptive treatment becomes more commonplace, use of DDA uncertainty tools will become increasingly important to inform adaptive treatment decisions. This work represents an important effort to formalize an end-user validation process using standardly available clinical tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信