在中学有效使用GenAI的数字能力:教师观点和课堂实践的纵向探索

IF 4.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Liron Levy-Nadav, Tamar Shamir-Inbal, Ina Blau
{"title":"在中学有效使用GenAI的数字能力:教师观点和课堂实践的纵向探索","authors":"Liron Levy-Nadav,&nbsp;Tamar Shamir-Inbal,&nbsp;Ina Blau","doi":"10.1111/jcal.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The rapid rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming education. At this stage, there is not yet a well-established and tested theoretical framework clarifying which competencies learners must possess to use GenAI effectively and safely. This study draws on three theoretical frameworks: Eshet-Alkalai's Digital Literacy Framework (2012), Long and Magerko's AI Literacy (2020) and DigComp 2.2.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The study aims to explore teachers' perspectives regarding the digital competencies that students need for effective GenAI tool use, as well as the classroom learning activities that facilitate the development and practice of these competencies and how they evolve over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews at an interval of 6–8 months with 17 teachers who had begun utilising a variety of GenAI tools for teaching purposes. This mixed-methods study combines qualitative top-down and bottom-up thematic analysis with quantitative comparisons between the pre and post measurements. Additionally, for data triangulation, a large qualitative sample of 97 GenAI-enhanced learning activities conducted in classrooms was analysed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Findings revealed seven key competencies categorised into general digital literacies, emerging technology literacies and GenAI-specific competencies. Three categories of classroom activities that practiced these competencies emerged: proper use of tools, fostering personal expression and encouraging critical discussion. As expected in the beginning of new technology integration, declines were observed in most competencies in both interviews and learning activities, except for a significant increase in critical-thinking competencies and stable levels of managing-ongoing dialogue. The findings suggest expanding the digital literacy framework by incorporating ‘Learning New Technology’, which covers general competencies for integrating emerging technologies, and specific GenAI-related competencies. The study offers valuable insights into theory and practice AI-enhanced learning.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.70123","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Competencies for Effective GenAI Use in Secondary Schools: A Longitudinal Exploration of Teachers' Perspectives and Classroom Practices\",\"authors\":\"Liron Levy-Nadav,&nbsp;Tamar Shamir-Inbal,&nbsp;Ina Blau\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcal.70123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The rapid rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming education. At this stage, there is not yet a well-established and tested theoretical framework clarifying which competencies learners must possess to use GenAI effectively and safely. This study draws on three theoretical frameworks: Eshet-Alkalai's Digital Literacy Framework (2012), Long and Magerko's AI Literacy (2020) and DigComp 2.2.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study aims to explore teachers' perspectives regarding the digital competencies that students need for effective GenAI tool use, as well as the classroom learning activities that facilitate the development and practice of these competencies and how they evolve over time.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews at an interval of 6–8 months with 17 teachers who had begun utilising a variety of GenAI tools for teaching purposes. This mixed-methods study combines qualitative top-down and bottom-up thematic analysis with quantitative comparisons between the pre and post measurements. Additionally, for data triangulation, a large qualitative sample of 97 GenAI-enhanced learning activities conducted in classrooms was analysed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings revealed seven key competencies categorised into general digital literacies, emerging technology literacies and GenAI-specific competencies. Three categories of classroom activities that practiced these competencies emerged: proper use of tools, fostering personal expression and encouraging critical discussion. As expected in the beginning of new technology integration, declines were observed in most competencies in both interviews and learning activities, except for a significant increase in critical-thinking competencies and stable levels of managing-ongoing dialogue. The findings suggest expanding the digital literacy framework by incorporating ‘Learning New Technology’, which covers general competencies for integrating emerging technologies, and specific GenAI-related competencies. The study offers valuable insights into theory and practice AI-enhanced learning.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.70123\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70123\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.70123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成式人工智能(GenAI)的迅速兴起正在改变教育。在这个阶段,还没有一个完善的和经过测试的理论框架来阐明学习者必须具备哪些能力才能有效和安全地使用GenAI。本研究借鉴了三个理论框架:eset - alkai的《数字扫盲框架》(2012年)、Long和Magerko的《人工智能扫盲》(2020年)和DigComp 2.2。本研究旨在探讨教师对学生有效使用GenAI工具所需的数字能力的看法,以及促进这些能力发展和实践的课堂学习活动,以及它们如何随着时间的推移而演变。方法我们对17名教师进行了34次半结构化访谈,访谈间隔为6-8个月,这些教师已经开始使用各种GenAI工具进行教学。这项混合方法的研究结合了定性的自上而下和自下而上的专题分析以及前后测量之间的定量比较。此外,为了进行数据三角测量,分析了在教室中进行的97次genai增强学习活动的大量定性样本。结果和结论调查结果揭示了七大关键能力,分为一般数字素养、新兴技术素养和基因人工智能特定能力。实践这些能力的三类课堂活动出现了:正确使用工具,培养个人表达和鼓励批判性讨论。正如在新技术整合开始时所预期的那样,在面试和学习活动中,除了批判性思维能力和管理持续对话的稳定水平显著提高外,大多数能力都有所下降。研究结果建议通过纳入“学习新技术”来扩大数字扫盲框架,该框架涵盖了整合新兴技术的一般能力以及与genai相关的具体能力。该研究为人工智能增强学习的理论和实践提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Digital Competencies for Effective GenAI Use in Secondary Schools: A Longitudinal Exploration of Teachers' Perspectives and Classroom Practices

Digital Competencies for Effective GenAI Use in Secondary Schools: A Longitudinal Exploration of Teachers' Perspectives and Classroom Practices

Background

The rapid rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is transforming education. At this stage, there is not yet a well-established and tested theoretical framework clarifying which competencies learners must possess to use GenAI effectively and safely. This study draws on three theoretical frameworks: Eshet-Alkalai's Digital Literacy Framework (2012), Long and Magerko's AI Literacy (2020) and DigComp 2.2.

Objectives

The study aims to explore teachers' perspectives regarding the digital competencies that students need for effective GenAI tool use, as well as the classroom learning activities that facilitate the development and practice of these competencies and how they evolve over time.

Methods

We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews at an interval of 6–8 months with 17 teachers who had begun utilising a variety of GenAI tools for teaching purposes. This mixed-methods study combines qualitative top-down and bottom-up thematic analysis with quantitative comparisons between the pre and post measurements. Additionally, for data triangulation, a large qualitative sample of 97 GenAI-enhanced learning activities conducted in classrooms was analysed.

Results and Conclusions

Findings revealed seven key competencies categorised into general digital literacies, emerging technology literacies and GenAI-specific competencies. Three categories of classroom activities that practiced these competencies emerged: proper use of tools, fostering personal expression and encouraging critical discussion. As expected in the beginning of new technology integration, declines were observed in most competencies in both interviews and learning activities, except for a significant increase in critical-thinking competencies and stable levels of managing-ongoing dialogue. The findings suggest expanding the digital literacy framework by incorporating ‘Learning New Technology’, which covers general competencies for integrating emerging technologies, and specific GenAI-related competencies. The study offers valuable insights into theory and practice AI-enhanced learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信