口服植物提取物中蜕皮烯和熊果酸的体内药动学特征

IF 1.7 4区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
D. A. Kiseleva, S. V. An’kov, T. G. Tolstikova, A. A. Okhina, A. D. Rogachev
{"title":"口服植物提取物中蜕皮烯和熊果酸的体内药动学特征","authors":"D. A. Kiseleva,&nbsp;S. V. An’kov,&nbsp;T. G. Tolstikova,&nbsp;A. A. Okhina,&nbsp;A. D. Rogachev","doi":"10.1134/S1068162024607316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective:</b> Bioavailability determination is critically important when studying the therapeutic potential of plant extracts, as it indicates whether active compounds retain their biological activity or gradually lose efficacy under various physiological conditions. Rosemary (<i>Rosmarinus officinalis</i> L.) represents the richest source of the pentacyclic triterpenoid ursolic acid, while ecdystene (20-hydroxyecdysone) is a principal phytoecdysteroid present in Rhaponticum (<i>Rhaponticum carthamoides</i> Willd.). Both plant sources are approved for pharmaceutical distribution as dietary supplements and metabolic therapy agents. However, limited information exists regarding the pharmacokinetic profiles of ecdystene and ursolic acid in plant extracts and multicomponent formulations. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of ecdystene, ursolic acid, Rhaponticum and Rosemary extracts, and a combination formulation containing both extracts after oral administration <i>in vivo</i>. <b>Methods:</b> Test substances and their extracts were administered as single intragastric doses to CD-1 outbred mice at doses standardized to equivalent concentrations of the primary active compounds. Ursolic acid and ecdystene concentrations in animal blood were quantified using HPLC-MS/MS for subsequent pharmacokinetic parameter calculations (<i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>max</sub>, AUC). <b>Results and Discussion:</b> Both compounds demonstrated decreased bioavailability in animal blood when administered as plant extracts compared to pure substances. In the combination formulation, only trace amounts of ecdystene were detected, while ursolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters showed no significant differences between the combination and rosemary extract. These findings demonstrate that combining plant extracts in multicomponent formulations can reduce bioavailability of active compounds through various physicochemical and biological mechanisms. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study confirms that plant extract combinations in multicomponent formulations may significantly decrease bioavailability of primary active substances through multiple factors. Development of plant extract-based products should incorporate comprehensive pharmacokinetic studies to ensure finished product quality and therapeutic efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":758,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry","volume":"51 4","pages":"1645 - 1653"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Ecdystene and Ursolic Acid in Plant Extracts After Oral Administration In Vivo\",\"authors\":\"D. A. Kiseleva,&nbsp;S. V. An’kov,&nbsp;T. G. Tolstikova,&nbsp;A. A. Okhina,&nbsp;A. D. Rogachev\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1068162024607316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Objective:</b> Bioavailability determination is critically important when studying the therapeutic potential of plant extracts, as it indicates whether active compounds retain their biological activity or gradually lose efficacy under various physiological conditions. Rosemary (<i>Rosmarinus officinalis</i> L.) represents the richest source of the pentacyclic triterpenoid ursolic acid, while ecdystene (20-hydroxyecdysone) is a principal phytoecdysteroid present in Rhaponticum (<i>Rhaponticum carthamoides</i> Willd.). Both plant sources are approved for pharmaceutical distribution as dietary supplements and metabolic therapy agents. However, limited information exists regarding the pharmacokinetic profiles of ecdystene and ursolic acid in plant extracts and multicomponent formulations. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of ecdystene, ursolic acid, Rhaponticum and Rosemary extracts, and a combination formulation containing both extracts after oral administration <i>in vivo</i>. <b>Methods:</b> Test substances and their extracts were administered as single intragastric doses to CD-1 outbred mice at doses standardized to equivalent concentrations of the primary active compounds. Ursolic acid and ecdystene concentrations in animal blood were quantified using HPLC-MS/MS for subsequent pharmacokinetic parameter calculations (<i>C</i><sub>max</sub>, <i>T</i><sub>max</sub>, AUC). <b>Results and Discussion:</b> Both compounds demonstrated decreased bioavailability in animal blood when administered as plant extracts compared to pure substances. In the combination formulation, only trace amounts of ecdystene were detected, while ursolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters showed no significant differences between the combination and rosemary extract. These findings demonstrate that combining plant extracts in multicomponent formulations can reduce bioavailability of active compounds through various physicochemical and biological mechanisms. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study confirms that plant extract combinations in multicomponent formulations may significantly decrease bioavailability of primary active substances through multiple factors. Development of plant extract-based products should incorporate comprehensive pharmacokinetic studies to ensure finished product quality and therapeutic efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"1645 - 1653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1068162024607316\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1068162024607316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在研究植物提取物的治疗潜力时,生物利用度测定是至关重要的,因为它表明活性化合物在各种生理条件下是保持其生物活性还是逐渐失去其生物活性。迷迭香(Rosmarinus officinalis L.)是五环三萜熊果酸最丰富的来源,而蜕皮素(20-羟基蜕皮素)是Rhaponticum (Rhaponticum carthamoides Willd.)中主要的植物蜕皮甾体。这两种植物来源都被批准作为膳食补充剂和代谢治疗药物分销。然而,关于植物提取物和多组分制剂中蜕皮素和熊果酸的药代动力学特征的信息有限。本研究旨在比较评价外皮草烯、熊果酸、Rhaponticum和迷迭香提取物及含两种提取物的联合制剂口服给药后的体内药动学参数。方法:将试验物质及其提取物以标准剂量给予CD-1远交种小鼠单次灌胃,剂量与主要活性化合物的浓度相当。采用高效液相色谱-质谱联用技术(HPLC-MS/MS)测定动物血中熊果酸和棘皮素浓度,计算药动学参数(Cmax、Tmax、AUC)。结果和讨论:与纯物质相比,这两种化合物作为植物提取物在动物血液中的生物利用度降低。在联合制剂中,仅检测到微量的迷迭香烯,而熊果酸的药代动力学参数与迷迭香提取物之间无显著差异。这些结果表明,植物提取物多组分组合可通过多种物理化学和生物机制降低活性化合物的生物利用度。结论:本研究证实,多组分制剂中植物提取物组合可通过多种因素显著降低主要活性物质的生物利用度。植物提取物类产品的开发应纳入全面的药代动力学研究,以确保成品质量和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Ecdystene and Ursolic Acid in Plant Extracts After Oral Administration In Vivo

Pharmacokinetic Characteristics of Ecdystene and Ursolic Acid in Plant Extracts After Oral Administration In Vivo

Objective: Bioavailability determination is critically important when studying the therapeutic potential of plant extracts, as it indicates whether active compounds retain their biological activity or gradually lose efficacy under various physiological conditions. Rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) represents the richest source of the pentacyclic triterpenoid ursolic acid, while ecdystene (20-hydroxyecdysone) is a principal phytoecdysteroid present in Rhaponticum (Rhaponticum carthamoides Willd.). Both plant sources are approved for pharmaceutical distribution as dietary supplements and metabolic therapy agents. However, limited information exists regarding the pharmacokinetic profiles of ecdystene and ursolic acid in plant extracts and multicomponent formulations. This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters of ecdystene, ursolic acid, Rhaponticum and Rosemary extracts, and a combination formulation containing both extracts after oral administration in vivo. Methods: Test substances and their extracts were administered as single intragastric doses to CD-1 outbred mice at doses standardized to equivalent concentrations of the primary active compounds. Ursolic acid and ecdystene concentrations in animal blood were quantified using HPLC-MS/MS for subsequent pharmacokinetic parameter calculations (Cmax, Tmax, AUC). Results and Discussion: Both compounds demonstrated decreased bioavailability in animal blood when administered as plant extracts compared to pure substances. In the combination formulation, only trace amounts of ecdystene were detected, while ursolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters showed no significant differences between the combination and rosemary extract. These findings demonstrate that combining plant extracts in multicomponent formulations can reduce bioavailability of active compounds through various physicochemical and biological mechanisms. Conclusions: This study confirms that plant extract combinations in multicomponent formulations may significantly decrease bioavailability of primary active substances through multiple factors. Development of plant extract-based products should incorporate comprehensive pharmacokinetic studies to ensure finished product quality and therapeutic efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry
Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
118
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry publishes reviews and original experimental and theoretical studies on the structure, function, structure–activity relationships, and synthesis of biopolymers, such as proteins, nucleic acids, polysaccharides, mixed biopolymers, and their complexes, and low-molecular-weight biologically active compounds (peptides, sugars, lipids, antibiotics, etc.). The journal also covers selected aspects of neuro- and immunochemistry, biotechnology, and ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信