基于飞行试验数据的非线性气动建模自适应优化器的比较

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences
M. Elenchezhiyan, Ajit Kumar
{"title":"基于飞行试验数据的非线性气动建模自适应优化器的比较","authors":"M. Elenchezhiyan,&nbsp;Ajit Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s42401-024-00320-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, adaptive optimizer-based deep neural network approaches are used to predict nonlinear aerodynamic model using flight test data of standard aircraft. Adaptive optimizers namely Adam and RMSprop algorithms are chosen to model the force and moment coefficients during steady stall phenomena. The effectiveness of these two methods are being investigated and validated. The estimated results from adaptive optimizer based methods are statistically analysed and compared with the conventionally used maximum likelihood method. Comparison results from the above methods are found to be relatively better than the maximum likelihood estimates in terms of RMSE and correlation. Moreover, the adaptive optimization methods are proven to be advantageous over conventionally used methods which strongly depend on solving equations of motion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36309,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace Systems","volume":"8 2","pages":"349 - 358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of adaptive optimizers for nonlinear aerodynamic modeling using flight test data\",\"authors\":\"M. Elenchezhiyan,&nbsp;Ajit Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42401-024-00320-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, adaptive optimizer-based deep neural network approaches are used to predict nonlinear aerodynamic model using flight test data of standard aircraft. Adaptive optimizers namely Adam and RMSprop algorithms are chosen to model the force and moment coefficients during steady stall phenomena. The effectiveness of these two methods are being investigated and validated. The estimated results from adaptive optimizer based methods are statistically analysed and compared with the conventionally used maximum likelihood method. Comparison results from the above methods are found to be relatively better than the maximum likelihood estimates in terms of RMSE and correlation. Moreover, the adaptive optimization methods are proven to be advantageous over conventionally used methods which strongly depend on solving equations of motion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aerospace Systems\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"349 - 358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aerospace Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42401-024-00320-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42401-024-00320-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用标准飞机的飞行试验数据,采用基于自适应优化器的深度神经网络方法对非线性气动模型进行预测。采用自适应优化器Adam和RMSprop算法对稳态失速时的力和力矩系数进行建模。这两种方法的有效性正在研究和验证中。对基于自适应优化器方法的估计结果进行了统计分析,并与传统的极大似然方法进行了比较。以上方法的比较结果在RMSE和相关性方面相对优于最大似然估计。此外,自适应优化方法被证明优于传统的依赖于求解运动方程的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of adaptive optimizers for nonlinear aerodynamic modeling using flight test data

In this paper, adaptive optimizer-based deep neural network approaches are used to predict nonlinear aerodynamic model using flight test data of standard aircraft. Adaptive optimizers namely Adam and RMSprop algorithms are chosen to model the force and moment coefficients during steady stall phenomena. The effectiveness of these two methods are being investigated and validated. The estimated results from adaptive optimizer based methods are statistically analysed and compared with the conventionally used maximum likelihood method. Comparison results from the above methods are found to be relatively better than the maximum likelihood estimates in terms of RMSE and correlation. Moreover, the adaptive optimization methods are proven to be advantageous over conventionally used methods which strongly depend on solving equations of motion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aerospace Systems
Aerospace Systems Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Aerospace Systems provides an international, peer-reviewed forum which focuses on system-level research and development regarding aeronautics and astronautics. The journal emphasizes the unique role and increasing importance of informatics on aerospace. It fills a gap in current publishing coverage from outer space vehicles to atmospheric vehicles by highlighting interdisciplinary science, technology and engineering. Potential topics include, but are not limited to: Trans-space vehicle systems design and integration Air vehicle systems Space vehicle systems Near-space vehicle systems Aerospace robotics and unmanned system Communication, navigation and surveillance Aerodynamics and aircraft design Dynamics and control Aerospace propulsion Avionics system Opto-electronic system Air traffic management Earth observation Deep space exploration Bionic micro-aircraft/spacecraft Intelligent sensing and Information fusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信