妊娠期糖尿病妇女健康促进干预中的干预保真度和行为改变机制:Face-it随机对照试验的二次分析

IF 2.3
Nanna Husted Jensen, Inger Katrine Dahl-Petersen, Karoline Kragelund Nielsen, Dorte Møller Jensen, Peter Damm, Per Ovesen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Ulla Kampmann, Christina Anne Vinter, Sharleen O'Reilly, Helle Terkildsen Maindal
{"title":"妊娠期糖尿病妇女健康促进干预中的干预保真度和行为改变机制:Face-it随机对照试验的二次分析","authors":"Nanna Husted Jensen, Inger Katrine Dahl-Petersen, Karoline Kragelund Nielsen, Dorte Møller Jensen, Peter Damm, Per Ovesen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Ulla Kampmann, Christina Anne Vinter, Sharleen O'Reilly, Helle Terkildsen Maindal","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We evaluated the fidelity of the Face-it intervention and its impact on behaviour change mechanisms among women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomised controlled trial, 277 women were allocated to usual care or an intervention comprising three home visits, digital platform health coaching and cross-sectoral communication to support health behaviour change during the first year after delivery. Behaviour change mechanisms included social support, motivation, self-efficacy, risk perception and health literacy. High fidelity was defined as completing three home visits and ≥ 9 coaching contacts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the intervention group, 86.4 % completed ≥ 2 home visits, 88.6 % registered digitally with a median (IQR) of 10.0 (3.0-20.0) contacts. At one-year after delivery, the high-fidelity group (n = 73; 39.7 %) had higher odds of perceiving moderate/high diabetes risk (OR 2.42; 95 % CI 1.06-5.51) and higher health literacy (adjusted difference 0.20; 95 % CI 0.04-0.35), whereas no difference was found for social support, motivation and self-efficacy compared with usual care. No difference was observed between the low fidelity and the usual care group in behaviour change mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Face-it intervention achieved acceptable fidelity. High fidelity appears essential for improving risk perception, health literacy and supporting behaviour change mechanisms among women with recent GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervention fidelity and behaviour change mechanisms in a health promotion intervention for women following gestational diabetes mellitus: Secondary analysis of the Face-it RCT.\",\"authors\":\"Nanna Husted Jensen, Inger Katrine Dahl-Petersen, Karoline Kragelund Nielsen, Dorte Møller Jensen, Peter Damm, Per Ovesen, Elisabeth R Mathiesen, Ulla Kampmann, Christina Anne Vinter, Sharleen O'Reilly, Helle Terkildsen Maindal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We evaluated the fidelity of the Face-it intervention and its impact on behaviour change mechanisms among women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomised controlled trial, 277 women were allocated to usual care or an intervention comprising three home visits, digital platform health coaching and cross-sectoral communication to support health behaviour change during the first year after delivery. Behaviour change mechanisms included social support, motivation, self-efficacy, risk perception and health literacy. High fidelity was defined as completing three home visits and ≥ 9 coaching contacts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the intervention group, 86.4 % completed ≥ 2 home visits, 88.6 % registered digitally with a median (IQR) of 10.0 (3.0-20.0) contacts. At one-year after delivery, the high-fidelity group (n = 73; 39.7 %) had higher odds of perceiving moderate/high diabetes risk (OR 2.42; 95 % CI 1.06-5.51) and higher health literacy (adjusted difference 0.20; 95 % CI 0.04-0.35), whereas no difference was found for social support, motivation and self-efficacy compared with usual care. No difference was observed between the low fidelity and the usual care group in behaviour change mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Face-it intervention achieved acceptable fidelity. High fidelity appears essential for improving risk perception, health literacy and supporting behaviour change mechanisms among women with recent GDM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary care diabetes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary care diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们评估Face-it干预的保真度及其对近期妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)妇女行为改变机制的影响。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,277名妇女被分配到常规护理或干预措施,包括三次家访、数字平台健康指导和跨部门沟通,以支持分娩后第一年的健康行为改变。行为改变机制包括社会支持、动机、自我效能、风险认知和卫生知识。高保真度定义为完成3次家访和≥ 9次辅导接触。结果:在干预组中,86.4%完成了≥ 2次家访,88.6% %进行了数字登记,中位数(IQR)为10.0(3.0-20.0)个接触者。在分娩后一年,高保真组(n = 73;39.7 %)有更高的察觉中度/高度糖尿病风险的几率(OR 2.42; 95 % CI 1.06-5.51)和更高的健康知识(调整差值0.20;95 % CI 0.04-0.35),而与常规护理相比,社会支持、动机和自我效能感没有差异。低保真度组和常规护理组在行为改变机制上没有差异。结论:Face-it干预达到了可接受的保真度。高保真度对于提高新近患GDM妇女的风险认知、健康知识和支持行为改变机制至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intervention fidelity and behaviour change mechanisms in a health promotion intervention for women following gestational diabetes mellitus: Secondary analysis of the Face-it RCT.

Aims: We evaluated the fidelity of the Face-it intervention and its impact on behaviour change mechanisms among women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods: In this randomised controlled trial, 277 women were allocated to usual care or an intervention comprising three home visits, digital platform health coaching and cross-sectoral communication to support health behaviour change during the first year after delivery. Behaviour change mechanisms included social support, motivation, self-efficacy, risk perception and health literacy. High fidelity was defined as completing three home visits and ≥ 9 coaching contacts.

Results: Within the intervention group, 86.4 % completed ≥ 2 home visits, 88.6 % registered digitally with a median (IQR) of 10.0 (3.0-20.0) contacts. At one-year after delivery, the high-fidelity group (n = 73; 39.7 %) had higher odds of perceiving moderate/high diabetes risk (OR 2.42; 95 % CI 1.06-5.51) and higher health literacy (adjusted difference 0.20; 95 % CI 0.04-0.35), whereas no difference was found for social support, motivation and self-efficacy compared with usual care. No difference was observed between the low fidelity and the usual care group in behaviour change mechanisms.

Conclusions: The Face-it intervention achieved acceptable fidelity. High fidelity appears essential for improving risk perception, health literacy and supporting behaviour change mechanisms among women with recent GDM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信